What is android fragmentation

The Android Ecosystem: A Double-Edged Sword of Diversity

The Android ecosystem is a marvel of open-source collaboration and customization, yet this very strength leads to what’s widely known as “Android fragmentation.” This isn’t a bug, but rather a fundamental byproduct of its design.

👉 Skip the hassle and get the ready to use 100% working script (Link in the comments section of the YouTube Video) (Latest test 31/05/2025)

Check more on: How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile & Cloudflare WAF – Reddit, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – Medium, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – LinkedIn Article

Think of it like a massive bazaar where every vendor sells a version of the same core product, but each has added their own flair, modifications, and unique packaging.

This diversity offers incredible choice to consumers, allowing for devices across every price point and feature set imaginable.

However, this same diversity creates significant challenges, particularly for developers trying to ensure a consistent experience and for users hoping for timely updates.

What Defines Fragmentation?

Fragmentation in Android isn’t just about different versions of the operating system. it’s a multifaceted issue. It encompasses:

• OS Version Fragmentation: The sheer number of active Android versions running on devices globally. As of early 2023, while Android 13 is the latest, significant portions of the user base are still on Android 12, 11, 10, and even older versions. For instance, data from Google indicates that Android 11 still holds a substantial market share.
• Hardware Fragmentation: The vast array of screen sizes, resolutions, CPU architectures ARM, x86, GPU types, RAM configurations, and sensor arrays. One device might have a high-resolution AMOLED display, while another has a low-res LCD. This impacts app design and performance.
• Manufacturer Customization Skins: OEMs like Samsung One UI, Xiaomi MIUI, OnePlus OxygenOS, and others heavily customize Android. These “skins” alter the user interface, add proprietary features, and sometimes even modify core Android behaviors. This can lead to inconsistencies in how apps behave or how system-level permissions are handled.
• Google Play Services Version Fragmentation: Even though Google Play Services updates independently, older Android versions may not support the latest versions of these crucial APIs, leading to a diminished feature set for apps relying on them.
• Geographic Fragmentation: Different regions might have different popular devices or even access to different apps due to regional restrictions or market preferences.

The Trade-Off: Choice vs. Consistency

The Impact on Developers: Navigating a Labyrinth

For developers, Android fragmentation is arguably the most significant hurdle. Dataprovider in selenium testng

Imagine building a house and needing to ensure it fits perfectly on thousands of different-sized plots, each with unique ground conditions and local building codes. That’s the developer’s reality.

This complexity directly affects development timelines, resource allocation, and ultimately, the quality of the end-user experience.

Testing Nightmares and Resource Drain

The sheer number of device and OS version combinations makes comprehensive testing a Herculean task.

Developers can’t realistically test their app on every single Android phone model.

• Device Labs and Emulators: Companies invest heavily in device labs, maintaining hundreds of physical devices, or rely on cloud-based testing services like Firebase Test Lab or BrowserStack. These services simulate real-world conditions across various devices, but they come at a cost.
• Increased QA Time: Quality Assurance QA teams spend significantly more time identifying and squashing bugs that only appear on specific devices or OS versions. A bug on a Samsung Galaxy S21 running Android 13 might not exist on a Google Pixel 7 running the same OS, or vice versa, due to manufacturer customizations.
• Higher Development Costs: More testing, more bug fixes, and more time spent on compatibility mean higher development costs. This can be particularly challenging for smaller development teams or independent developers.

Design and UI/UX Challenges

Designing a user interface UI and user experience UX that looks good and functions well across drastically different screen sizes, aspect ratios, and resolutions is a constant balancing act.

• Responsive Design: Developers must implement responsive design principles, using flexible layouts and scalable assets vector drawables to ensure the UI adapts gracefully. However, pixel-perfect design can be elusive.
• Notch and Cutout Handling: The proliferation of notches, punch-holes, and other screen cutouts requires careful design to ensure critical UI elements aren’t obscured.
• Touch Input Variations: Some devices have more sensitive touchscreens, different haptic feedback capabilities, or even unique gestures introduced by OEMs, which can impact how users interact with an app.
• Performance Optimization: An app that runs smoothly on a high-end flagship phone might crawl on a budget device with limited RAM and a slower processor. Developers must optimize for a wide range of performance profiles, often having to compromise on graphical fidelity or complex animations.

API Level and Feature Set Dilemmas

Android’s continuous evolution means new features and APIs are introduced with each major OS release.

Developers face a dilemma: support older versions to reach a broader audience, or target newer versions to leverage advanced features?

• minSdkVersion and targetSdkVersion: These manifest attributes are critical. Setting a low minSdkVersion ensures broader compatibility but forces developers to use older APIs or implement complex backward-compatible solutions. Setting a high targetSdkVersion allows use of the latest features but restricts the app to newer devices.
• Conditional Feature Implementation: Developers often have to write conditional code blocks that check the device’s API level before using certain features, ensuring the app doesn’t crash on older devices. For example, using a new camera API might require checking if Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.LOLLIPOP before calling the specific method.
• Security Patch Level: Even within the same Android version, devices can have different security patch levels. This means some security vulnerabilities might persist on older devices, potentially making them less secure if apps don’t account for these differences.

The User Experience: Delays, Inconsistencies, and Security Concerns

For the end-user, fragmentation manifests in ways that can be frustrating, confusing, and even risky.

While the vast choice of devices is a benefit, the aftermath of that choice can be a poorer overall experience compared to a more controlled ecosystem.

Delayed Updates and Feature Parity

This is arguably the most visible impact for users. Visual testing beginners guide

When Google releases a new Android version, it’s rarely available instantly on every device.

• OEM and Carrier Bottlenecks: After Google releases the source code, device manufacturers OEMs must adapt it to their specific hardware, add their custom skins, and pre-load their apps. Then, mobile carriers often add another layer of testing and approval before pushing the update. This entire process can take months, or even a year, for many devices. For example, while Google Pixel devices often get updates within days, other brands might see delays of 6-12 months, if at all.
• Obsolescence: Many budget or older devices simply stop receiving major OS updates after a year or two, leaving them stuck on older Android versions. A 2022 report suggested that over 50% of active Android devices were running versions older than Android 11.
• Feature Disparity: Users on older Android versions miss out on new features, performance improvements, and user interface enhancements that come with newer releases. This creates a two-tiered experience where those with newer, often more expensive, devices benefit first.

Inconsistent User Interface and Pre-installed Apps

The same app can look and behave differently on devices from different manufacturers due to their custom Android skins.

• UI/UX Discrepancies: A common navigation pattern or notification style on a Samsung device might be entirely different on a Xiaomi or a OnePlus phone. This creates a learning curve when switching brands and can lead to frustration.
• Bloatware: OEMs and carriers often pre-install their own applications, many of which cannot be uninstalled. This “bloatware” consumes storage space, RAM, and battery life, often without the user’s explicit consent or benefit. For example, a new Samsung device might come with dozens of pre-installed apps from Samsung, Google, and the carrier.
• System App Overlaps: Many manufacturers duplicate functionality already present in Android e.g., their own calendar, gallery, messaging apps rather than leveraging Google’s default apps, leading to confusion and unnecessary redundancy.

Security Vulnerabilities and Patching Gaps

This is perhaps the most critical consequence of fragmentation.

Older Android versions and delayed security updates leave millions of devices vulnerable to exploits.

• Unpatched Exploits: When a new security vulnerability is discovered, Google releases a patch. However, if an OEM or carrier doesn’t push that patch to a device, it remains exposed. Attackers often target these known, unpatched vulnerabilities.
• Long-Term Support: Unlike Apple’s iOS, where even older devices often receive security updates for many years, Android’s update cycle is often shorter, leaving many devices without critical security patches after a few years.
• User Awareness: Many users are unaware of their device’s security patch level or the risks associated with running outdated software. This lack of awareness exacerbates the problem. Studies have shown that devices running Android versions 8.0 Oreo or older often have critical unpatched vulnerabilities.

Google’s Efforts to Combat Fragmentation: A Strategic Push

Google is acutely aware of the fragmentation challenge and has implemented several strategies to mitigate its impact, primarily by modularizing Android and taking more control over core components.

These efforts aim to streamline updates and provide a more consistent baseline experience.

Project Treble: Modularizing the Core OS

Launched with Android 8.0 Oreo in 2017, Project Treble was a monumental architectural change designed to make OS updates faster and easier for manufacturers.

• Vendor Interface: Treble separates the Android OS framework from the device-specific vendor implementation the low-level software that interacts with hardware. This creates a stable “vendor interface” that the Android framework can communicate with.
• Faster Updates: Before Treble, OEMs had to update both the Android framework and their vendor implementation for each new OS version, a time-consuming process. With Treble, they only need to update the vendor implementation once to be compatible with future Android framework updates. This significantly reduces the engineering effort required for OEMs to push updates.
• Real-World Impact: While not a silver bullet, Treble has demonstrably improved update speeds for many devices, especially those from manufacturers committed to timely updates. Data from Google shows an increase in the adoption rate of newer Android versions since Treble’s introduction, although fragmentation still persists.

Mainline Project Apex: Updating OS Components via Play Store

Introduced with Android 10, Project Mainline allows Google to update specific low-level Android components directly through the Google Play Store, much like an app update.

• Modular Components: Mainline identifies key components of the Android OS e.g., media codecs, Wi-Fi stack, ANGLE, DNS resolver, Time Zone data that are critical for security and functionality.
• Faster Security Patches and Features: Instead of waiting for a full OS update from the OEM, Google can push security fixes and improvements to these individual components directly to devices. This bypasses the OEM/carrier update pipeline for these specific modules, significantly improving responsiveness to vulnerabilities and delivering new features more quickly.
• Enhanced Security: By enabling rapid patching of critical components, Mainline hardens the Android ecosystem against emerging threats, ensuring a more secure experience for users even if their full OS version isn’t the latest.

Android Go Edition: Tailoring for Entry-Level Devices

To address fragmentation at the very low-end of the hardware spectrum, Google introduced Android Go Edition.

• Optimized for Low RAM: Android Go is a stripped-down, optimized version of Android designed for devices with 2GB of RAM or less. It uses lighter versions of Google apps e.g., Google Go, Maps Go, Gallery Go and implements data-saving features.
• Broader Accessibility: This initiative makes modern Android experiences accessible on ultra-affordable smartphones, particularly in emerging markets, without requiring manufacturers to heavily modify the OS themselves.
• Reduced Fragmentation at the low end: By providing a standard, optimized experience for entry-level devices, Android Go helps reduce the need for highly customized and potentially problematic low-memory Android forks, leading to a more consistent experience within this segment. As of late 2022, over 250 million active devices run on Android Go.

Manufacturer Strategies: The OEM Role in Fragmentation

While Google implements changes at the core OS level, device manufacturers OEMs play a pivotal role in either exacerbating or mitigating Android fragmentation through their design choices, software policies, and commitment to updates. Continuous integration with agile

Custom Skins and Bloatware: Differentiation vs. Consistency

OEMs extensively customize Android to differentiate their products, but this often comes at the cost of consistency and update speed.

• Unique Selling Propositions: Custom skins like Samsung’s One UI, Xiaomi’s MIUI, or OnePlus’s OxygenOS offer distinct visual styles, proprietary apps e.g., Samsung’s Bixby, Xiaomi’s Mi Home, and additional features not found in stock Android. These are often marketed as unique selling propositions.
• Integration Challenges: Deep integration of these customizations makes it harder and more time-consuming for OEMs to adapt new Android versions. Every new OS release requires significant re-engineering and testing of their custom layers to ensure compatibility.
• Value-Added Services and Bloat: Many OEMs and carriers pre-install their own apps and services. While some offer genuine value, others are considered “bloatware” that consume system resources, display unwanted notifications, and cannot be easily removed, contributing to a less optimal user experience.

Update Policies and Lifecycles: The OEM Commitment

The biggest differentiator in fragmentation for users is an OEM’s commitment to software updates, both major OS versions and security patches.

• Varying Commitments: Google’s Pixel devices receive updates first and for the longest duration typically 3 major OS updates and 5 years of security updates. Samsung has significantly improved its update policy, now offering 4 major OS updates and 5 years of security patches for many of its flagship and mid-range devices. Other OEMs have shorter, less consistent update cycles.
• Flagships vs. Mid-Range/Budget: Premium flagship devices typically receive more frequent and longer-lasting updates compared to mid-range or budget-friendly models, which often receive only one or two major OS updates, if any, and sometimes limited security patches.
• Transparency: Some OEMs are more transparent about their update roadmaps than others. This lack of clarity can be frustrating for users wondering when, or if, their device will receive the next Android version.

Hardware Diversification: catering to Every Niche

OEMs produce an incredible variety of hardware configurations, from foldable phones to rugged outdoor devices, each with unique specifications.

• Specialized Hardware: Features like specific camera sensors, haptic feedback engines, stylus support e.g., Samsung S Pen, or unique display technologies require specialized drivers and software optimization.
• Performance Tiers: The wide range of processors, RAM, and storage options means OEMs must optimize their software for everything from blazing-fast performance to extremely limited resources. This can result in varying levels of smoothness and responsiveness across their product lines, contributing to fragmentation.
• Regional Variations: Even within a single model line, different regions might receive variations in hardware e.g., different chipsets for 5G modems, adding another layer of complexity for software compatibility.

The Future of Android Fragmentation: A More Harmonized Landscape?

While complete elimination of Android fragmentation is unlikely given its open nature, Google and OEMs are moving towards a more harmonized ecosystem.

The trends suggest a future where updates are more timely, core functionalities are more consistent, and security is enhanced across the board.

Continued Modularity and Project Mainline Expansion

Google will likely continue its strategy of modularizing Android components and expanding Project Mainline.

• More Updatable Modules: Expect more critical system components to be moved into Mainline modules, allowing for more frequent and direct updates from Google. This will further reduce reliance on OEM update pipelines for essential security and performance enhancements.
• Faster Bug Fixes: As more components become modular, Google can push urgent bug fixes and security patches directly to users without waiting for a full OS update, improving the overall responsiveness of the ecosystem.
• Consistent Core Experience: By standardizing and directly updating more underlying components, Google can ensure a more consistent baseline experience across devices, even with varying OEM skins on top.

Strengthening OEM Update Commitments

There’s a growing industry trend towards longer software support cycles from OEMs.

• Increased Pressure from Google: Google has subtly and sometimes not so subtly pressured OEMs to improve their update commitments, using metrics and public communication.
• Consumer Demand: Users are increasingly prioritizing long-term software support as a factor in their purchasing decisions, especially with device prices rising. OEMs like Samsung and OnePlus have responded by extending their update guarantees. For example, Samsung’s promise of 4 OS updates and 5 years of security patches for flagships sets a new standard.
• Competitive Advantage: Offering superior software support can become a key differentiator for OEMs in a crowded market, encouraging others to follow suit.

Cloud-Native Android and Greater Control for Google

While Android remains open-source, Google has been steadily exerting more control over key aspects of the ecosystem, often through its Google Play Services.

• Play Services as a De Facto OS: Many critical Android features and APIs are now delivered via Google Play Services, which updates independently of the core OS. This allows Google to push features like Location Services, Google Pay, or Firebase APIs to older devices without needing a full OS update.
• Standardization of Core Apps: The dominance of Google Play Store and Google Mobile Services GMS means that core applications like Maps, Gmail, and Chrome provide a consistent experience across all certified Android devices, irrespective of the underlying OS version or OEM skin.
• Potential for Future Cloud Features: As cloud computing becomes more pervasive, Google might integrate more OS-level functionalities directly from the cloud, further decoupling them from on-device OS versions and potentially offering a more unified experience.

The Role of Open Source: Blessing and Burden

Android’s open-source nature is both its greatest strength and the root cause of fragmentation.

Understanding this duality is crucial to grasping why fragmentation persists and why it’s unlikely to ever be fully eliminated. What is bug tracking

The Power of Openness: Innovation and Accessibility

Open source has allowed Android to achieve unparalleled global reach and innovation.

• Lower Barrier to Entry for OEMs: Any manufacturer can take the Android Open Source Project AOSP code, modify it, and put it on their hardware without paying licensing fees. This has fueled fierce competition, driven down device prices, and made smartphones accessible to billions worldwide. For instance, manufacturers in emerging markets can create highly localized Android experiences.
• Rapid Innovation: The open nature fosters rapid innovation. Manufacturers can experiment with new form factors e.g., foldables, hardware components, and software features without waiting for a monolithic update cycle. This has led to diverse innovations like in-display fingerprint sensors, advanced camera systems, and unique gestures.
• Developer Freedom: Developers have extensive access to the Android source code, allowing for deep customization, development of custom ROMs, and a vibrant community of tinkerers and modders. This fosters a dynamic ecosystem beyond just commercial apps.

The Cost of Freedom: Inconsistency and Management Challenges

The same openness that drives innovation also creates the fragmentation headache.

• Lack of Centralized Control: Unlike iOS, where Apple controls both hardware and software, Android’s distributed development model means Google doesn’t have unilateral control over updates or customizations once the AOSP code is released. This makes managing consistency across the vast ecosystem incredibly challenging.
• OEM Priorities: OEMs have their own business priorities, which may not always align with timely Android updates. Their focus might be on launching new hardware, integrating proprietary services, or managing their own development cycles.
• Ecosystem Inertia: The sheer scale of the Android ecosystem – billions of devices from hundreds of manufacturers – means that changes and updates propagate slowly through the network. The “long tail” of older devices ensures fragmentation remains a persistent characteristic.

The Long-Term Perspective: Embracing and Managing Fragmentation

Android fragmentation, in its broadest sense, is here to stay.

It’s an inherent characteristic of an open, diverse, and globally adopted operating system.

The goal isn’t to eliminate it entirely, but rather to manage its negative impacts, particularly for developers and security, while retaining the benefits of choice and innovation.

For Developers: Adaptive Strategies and Best Practices

Developers must continue to build with fragmentation in mind, adopting adaptive strategies:

• API Level Targeting: Smartly balance minSdkVersion and targetSdkVersion. While a higher minSdkVersion simplifies development by allowing use of newer APIs, it limits reach. Using conditional logic for newer features remains critical.
• Responsive Design Principles: Prioritize flexible layouts, constraint layouts, and scalable assets vector drawables to ensure UIs adapt to various screen sizes and resolutions. Thoroughly test on a range of emulators and, ideally, a diverse set of physical devices.
• Android Jetpack and Kotlin: Leverage modern Android development tools like Android Jetpack, which provides backward-compatible libraries e.g., AppCompat, Material Design components that bridge API level differences. Kotlin, with its conciseness and safety features, also aids in building robust applications.
• Performance Optimization: Profile and optimize apps for performance on a wide range of hardware, focusing on memory efficiency, battery usage, and smooth animations even on less powerful devices. This means avoiding unnecessary background processes and being mindful of resource consumption.
• Firebase and Analytics: Utilize tools like Firebase Crashlytics to monitor app stability across different devices and Android versions. Analytics platforms provide insights into the specific devices and OS versions your user base is running, allowing for targeted testing and optimization efforts.

For Users: Informed Choices and Security Awareness

• Prioritize Update Policies: When purchasing a new Android phone, research the manufacturer’s update track record and their stated software support policy. Devices from Google Pixel, Samsung flagships and many mid-range, and some OnePlus models typically offer better long-term support.
• Security Patch Level Check: Regularly check your device’s security patch level usually found in Settings > About Phone > Android security update. If you consistently remain months behind, it might be a sign that your device is no longer receiving timely patches.
• Consider a Google Pixel: For the most consistent, timely updates and stock Android experience, Google’s Pixel line remains the gold standard, as they receive updates directly from Google with no OEM or carrier delays.
• App Updates are Key: Even if your OS isn’t the latest, keep your apps updated via the Google Play Store. Many app developers implement backward-compatible features and security fixes in their app updates, mitigating some risks.
• Avoid Unofficial Sources: Only download apps from the Google Play Store or other trusted sources to minimize the risk of malware, especially on older, potentially unpatched devices.

The narrative around Android fragmentation is shifting from a purely negative problem to a complex, ongoing challenge that the ecosystem is actively managing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Android fragmentation?

Android fragmentation refers to the diversity within the Android ecosystem, encompassing variations in software versions, hardware specifications, screen sizes, and manufacturer customizations across different devices.

It means there isn’t a single, uniform Android experience.

Why does Android fragmentation occur?

It occurs due to Android’s open-source nature, allowing numerous manufacturers to customize the OS for their specific hardware and add unique features, leading to a wide array of devices running different versions of Android and various manufacturer skins. Datepicker in selenium

Is Android fragmentation a problem?

Yes, it can be a significant problem for developers who must ensure their apps work across a multitude of device and software combinations, and for users who may experience delayed updates, inconsistent features, and potential security vulnerabilities.

How does fragmentation affect Android app developers?

Fragmentation leads to increased development complexity, extensive testing requirements across various devices, challenges in UI/UX design for different screen sizes, and the need to manage compatibility with multiple API levels, all of which increase development costs and time.

What is Project Treble, and how does it address fragmentation?

Project Treble, introduced with Android 8.0 Oreo, modularizes the Android OS framework from vendor implementations.

This separation makes it easier and faster for manufacturers to update their devices to newer Android versions, as they don’t have to rebuild the entire system for each update.

What is Project Mainline Project Apex, and how does it help?

Project Mainline, introduced with Android 10, allows Google to update specific low-level Android components like media codecs or DNS resolver directly through the Google Play Store.

This bypasses OEM and carrier update delays for critical security and functionality improvements.

Do Google Pixel phones suffer from fragmentation?

Google Pixel phones experience significantly less fragmentation.

Since they are developed by Google, they receive Android updates directly and immediately, maintaining a consistent, stock Android experience and longer software support.

How do custom OEM skins contribute to fragmentation?

Custom OEM skins e.g., Samsung One UI, Xiaomi MIUI are deep modifications of the Android UI and functionality.

They require significant re-engineering for each new Android version, slowing down updates and creating inconsistent user experiences across brands. How to reduce page load time in javascript

What is bloatware, and how is it related to fragmentation?

Bloatware refers to unwanted pre-installed apps by OEMs and carriers.

It’s related to fragmentation because these apps are part of the manufacturer’s customization, consuming storage, RAM, and battery, and contributing to the diverse, non-uniform Android experience.

How does Android Go Edition help with fragmentation?

Android Go Edition is a lightweight version of Android optimized for entry-level devices with limited RAM.

By providing a standardized, optimized experience for these devices, it reduces the need for heavy, inconsistent customizations by manufacturers in the low-end segment.

Does fragmentation impact Android device security?

Yes, significantly.

Delayed or absent security updates due to fragmentation leave millions of devices vulnerable to known exploits, as patches released by Google may not reach older or poorly supported devices in a timely manner.

How can a user check their Android device’s security patch level?

Users can typically find their device’s security patch level in the “Settings” app, under “About Phone” or “Software Information.” It will usually show a date, indicating when the last security update was applied.

What can users do to mitigate the effects of fragmentation?

Users can choose devices from manufacturers with good update track records like Google Pixel or newer Samsung flagships, regularly update their apps through the Play Store, and avoid downloading apps from unofficial sources.

Why is Android’s open-source nature both a strength and a weakness?

It’s a strength because it fosters innovation, competition, and global accessibility.

It’s a weakness because it leads to fragmentation due to a lack of centralized control over updates and customizations by numerous manufacturers. Appium desktop

Are there any benefits to Android fragmentation?

Yes, fragmentation leads to incredible device diversity, offering users a vast choice of hardware at various price points, unique features from different manufacturers, and regional market catering that a more controlled ecosystem might not provide.

How long do Android phones typically receive updates?

The duration varies greatly by manufacturer and device tier.

Google Pixel devices generally receive 3 major OS updates and 5 years of security updates.

Samsung now offers 4 OS updates and 5 years of security for many flagships, while many other OEMs offer shorter support.

What is the difference between an OS update and a security patch?

An OS update brings new features, UI changes, and performance improvements to the core Android system.

A security patch specifically addresses vulnerabilities and exploits found in the operating system, often without adding new features.

Will Android fragmentation ever be eliminated?

No, complete elimination of Android fragmentation is highly unlikely due to its open-source nature and the diverse ecosystem of manufacturers.

The goal is to manage and mitigate its negative impacts rather than remove it entirely.

What are Android Jetpack and Kotlin’s roles in dealing with fragmentation?

Android Jetpack provides a suite of libraries that help developers build robust and backward-compatible apps, bridging API level differences.

Kotlin, as a modern programming language, offers features that simplify development and improve app stability across varied Android environments. Test planning

How does Google Play Services help unify the Android experience despite fragmentation?

Google Play Services acts as a crucial layer that updates independently of the core OS.

It delivers many critical Android features and APIs, ensuring that even devices on older Android versions can access the latest functionalities and security improvements for many common services and apps.