When trying to figure out which Python library to use for your HTTP requests, urllib3 or requests, it comes down to your specific needs for control, complexity, and ease of use. To make the best choice, here are the detailed steps:

👉 Skip the hassle and get the ready to use 100% working script (Link in the comments section of the YouTube Video) (Latest test 31/05/2025)

Check more on: How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile & Cloudflare WAF – Reddit, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – Medium, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – LinkedIn Article

For quick, high-level HTTP requests and ease of use: Choose requests. It’s built on top of urllib3 and offers a much more human-friendly API. Think of it as the “batteries included” solution.
- Example: Fetching a simple webpage.
```
import requests


response = requests.get'https://example.com'
printresponse.status_code
```
For low-level control, performance tuning, or integrating into other libraries: Go with urllib3. It provides the foundational HTTP client with direct access to connection pooling, retries, and lower-level details. It’s the engine under the hood for requests.
- Example: Managing connection pools manually or building a custom HTTP client.
  import urllib3
  http = urllib3.PoolManager
  
  Response = http.request’GET’, ‘https://example.com‘
  printresponse.status
Consider the use case:
- Data fetching APIs, web scraping: requests is usually the go-to. Its straightforward API simplifies common tasks like JSON handling, authentication, and session management.
- Library development or proxy servers: urllib3 gives you the granular control needed for these more complex scenarios, allowing you to fine-tune network interactions.
Dependencies: requests depends on urllib3, so if you install requests, you’ll implicitly get urllib3. However, urllib3 can be used standalone.

Table of Contents

Understanding the Core: urllib3 as the Foundation

When you’re trying to optimize your network interactions in Python, it’s crucial to understand the hierarchy.

Think of urllib3 as the robust, high-performance engine that powers many of your Python HTTP requests. It’s not just a library.

It’s a foundational component designed for efficiency and reliability in handling HTTP connections.

urllib3 was engineered to address common pitfalls of earlier HTTP clients, such as inefficient connection management and lack of retry mechanisms.

It provides crucial features like connection pooling, client-side SSL/TLS verification, HTTP retries, and a robust warning system.

Many popular libraries, including requests, are built on top of urllib3 precisely because of its reliability and feature set.

According to recent download statistics, urllib3 consistently ranks among the most downloaded Python packages on PyPI, indicating its widespread adoption and integral role in the Python ecosystem, with tens of millions of monthly downloads.

The Problem urllib3 Solves: Connection Management

Before urllib3, managing HTTP connections in Python could be a headache. Opening and closing a new TCP connection for every single HTTP request is incredibly inefficient, especially for applications making numerous requests to the same host. This “connect-then-disconnect” pattern leads to significant overhead due to the TCP handshake and SSL negotiation for each request. urllib3 tackles this head-on by implementing connection pooling. Instead of closing connections immediately after a request, urllib3 keeps them open and reuses them for subsequent requests to the same host. This significantly reduces latency and resource consumption. For example, a typical TCP handshake takes about 200ms, and an SSL/TLS handshake can add another 200-500ms. By pooling connections, these latencies are incurred only once per host, leading to substantial performance gains, sometimes reducing request times by 50% or more for persistent connections.

Key Features of urllib3: Beyond Basic Requests

urllib3 is packed with features that make it a powerful choice for lower-level network programming. These features include:

Thread-safety: Essential for concurrent applications, urllib3 handles connections safely across multiple threads.
Connection Pooling: As mentioned, this is a must for performance. It maintains a pool of connections for each host, reusing them to minimize overhead.
Client-side SSL/TLS verification: Crucial for security, ensuring you’re connecting to trusted servers and preventing Man-in-the-Middle attacks.
File uploads with multipart encoding: Simplifies sending data with forms, a common web interaction.
Helpers for retrying requests and dealing with HTTP redirects: Built-in mechanisms to handle transient network issues and redirection logic automatically.
Support for Brotli and Zstandard decoding: Optimizes data transfer by supporting advanced compression algorithms.
HTTP proxy support: Allows routing requests through proxies, which is useful for corporate networks or specific use cases.
Warnings and error handling: Provides clear feedback on potential issues like insecure requests or connection problems.

The `requests` Library: Humanity’s HTTP for Python

Now, let’s talk about requests. If urllib3 is the powerful engine, requests is the sleek, user-friendly car that lets you drive that engine without needing to be a mechanic. Visual basic web scraping

Kenneth Reitz designed requests with a simple philosophy: make HTTP requests as straightforward and intuitive as possible.

He recognized that while urllib3 provides incredible power, its API could be daunting for everyday tasks.

requests abstracts away much of that complexity, offering a high-level, human-readable API that makes common HTTP operations a breeze.

It handles things like query parameters, form data, JSON serialization, and even session management with remarkable simplicity.

This ease of use has made requests incredibly popular.

It’s often the first library Python developers reach for when they need to interact with web services.

Data from PyPI shows requests consistently as one of the top five most downloaded Python packages, with millions of downloads each month, highlighting its dominant position in the ecosystem.

The “Batteries Included” Philosophy of `requests`

requests truly embodies the “batteries included” philosophy that Python is famous for.

It’s not just a wrapper around urllib3. it adds significant value by providing sensible defaults and conveniences that simplify common tasks. Here’s how it shines:

Intuitive API: The syntax is designed to be self-explanatory. requests.get, requests.post, response.json, response.status_code – it all just makes sense.
Automatic Content Decoding: Handles various encoding types automatically, so you don’t have to worry about decoding gzip or deflate responses.
Session Management: The Session object allows you to persist certain parameters across requests, such as cookies, ensuring efficient and stateful interactions with web services.
Built-in JSON Encoding/Decoding: Easily send and receive JSON data without manual serialization/deserialization.
Authentication: Supports various authentication methods Basic, Digest, OAuth, custom with simple parameters.
SSL Certificate Verification: By default, requests verifies SSL certificates, enhancing security, and provides clear ways to manage trusted certificates.
Redirects: Handles HTTP redirects automatically by default, following them until a final response is received.

Common Use Cases for `requests`: Where it Shines

requests is the undisputed champion for most web-related tasks in Python. Selenium ruby

Its simplicity and robust feature set make it ideal for:

Interacting with RESTful APIs: This is perhaps its most common use. Whether you’re integrating with a payment gateway, a social media API, or a cloud service, requests makes sending authenticated requests and parsing JSON responses effortless.
Web Scraping: While dedicated libraries like BeautifulSoup and Scrapy exist, requests is often the first step in web scraping—fetching the HTML content of a page. Its ability to handle cookies, headers, and proxies makes it highly effective.
Testing Web Services: Developers frequently use requests to write automated tests for their own web applications, verifying API endpoints and response data.
Simple File Downloads/Uploads: Sending a file via a POST request or downloading a file from a URL is straightforward with requests.
CLI Tools and Automation Scripts: For any script that needs to interact with an online resource, requests provides a clean and reliable way to do so. For instance, a simple script to check website availability or post data to a monitoring service.

Performance and Resource Management: Delving Deeper

When you’re dealing with network operations, especially at scale, performance and efficient resource management are paramount.

This is where the underlying mechanisms of urllib3 become critical, even when you’re using requests. While requests offers convenience, it still relies on urllib3 for its core connection handling.

Understanding how urllib3 manages connections and how requests exposes these capabilities is key to optimizing your application’s network footprint.

For example, persistent connections HTTP Keep-Alive can reduce latency by up to 50% on high-latency networks compared to opening a new connection for each request, a feature urllib3 handles automatically through its connection pooling.

Connection Pooling: The Engine Behind Efficiency

urllib3’s connection pooling is arguably its most significant contribution to network performance.

Instead of performing a costly TCP handshake and SSL negotiation for every single HTTP request, urllib3 maintains a pool of open connections to various hosts.

When you make a request to a host that already has an available connection in the pool, urllib3 reuses that connection.

This dramatically reduces the overhead, especially for applications making numerous requests to the same server e.g., an API client hitting a single endpoint repeatedly.

Here’s why it matters: Golang net http user agent

Reduced Latency: Eliminates the time spent on repeated TCP handshakes and SSL negotiations.
Lower CPU Usage: Less cryptographic work SSL and fewer new socket creations.
Reduced Server Load: Fewer new connections for the server to manage.

When you use requests, it automatically leverages urllib3’s connection pooling through its Session objects.

If you perform multiple requests using the same requests.Session instance, requests will intelligently reuse the underlying urllib3 connections.

For instance, testing has shown that using requests.Session can lead to a 30-40% improvement in request speed for repeated calls to the same host compared to using direct requests.get calls that create new underlying sessions implicitly.

Handling Retries and Timeouts: Robustness in Action

Network operations are inherently unreliable.

Connections can drop, servers can be temporarily overloaded, and data can get lost.

Both urllib3 and requests offer robust mechanisms to handle these common issues, making your applications more resilient.

Retries

urllib3 provides a Retry object that allows you to configure automatic retries for failed requests, based on:

Status Codes: Retrying on 500, 502, 503, 504.
Exceptions: Retrying on connection errors.
Max Retries: Limiting the number of retries.
Backoff Factor: Implementing exponential backoff to prevent overwhelming the server.

With requests, you can leverage urllib3‘s retry logic by attaching a Retry object to an HTTPAdapter and mounting it to a Session. This allows you to define a retry policy for all requests made through that session. This is critical for making API calls robust.

For example, a service might experience temporary outages e.g., a 503 error but recover quickly.

A well-configured retry policy can make your application automatically recover from these transient issues without manual intervention. Selenium proxy php

Timeouts

Both libraries allow you to set timeouts for your requests.

This is crucial to prevent your application from hanging indefinitely if a server is unresponsive.

urllib3: You can specify timeout when creating a PoolManager or on individual requests. This timeout can be a float total timeout or a urllib3.Timeout object which allows separate connect and read timeouts.
requests: Simplifies this with a timeout parameter directly on request methods e.g., requests.geturl, timeout=5. This timeout specifies the maximum number of seconds to wait for a response after connecting. If no response is received within the timeout, a requests.exceptions.Timeout is raised.

Properly setting timeouts prevents your application threads from being tied up waiting for unresponsive servers, improving overall system stability and resource utilization.

For instance, in an API Gateway scenario, setting a strict timeout of 5-10 seconds for downstream services is common practice to prevent cascading failures.

Security Considerations: SSL/TLS and Certificate Verification

When you’re making HTTP requests, especially over the public internet, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the connection is non-negotiable.

This is where SSL/TLS Secure Sockets Layer/Transport Layer Security and certificate verification come into play.

Both urllib3 and requests provide robust mechanisms to handle these aspects, but requests simplifies the process significantly.

It’s estimated that over 90% of web traffic now uses HTTPS, underscoring the critical need for proper SSL/TLS handling in any HTTP client.

Ignoring these security measures can expose your application to serious vulnerabilities like Man-in-the-Middle MITM attacks, where an attacker intercepts and potentially modifies your data.

Default Secure Behavior: `requests` Leading the Way

One of the standout features of requests is its commitment to secure defaults. By default, requests verifies SSL certificates for HTTPS requests. This means that when you make a request to an https:// URL, requests will: Java httpclient user agent

Verify the server’s certificate: It checks that the certificate presented by the server is valid, not expired, and signed by a trusted Certificate Authority CA.
Verify the hostname: It ensures that the hostname in the certificate matches the hostname you are connecting to, preventing impersonation.

If any of these checks fail, requests will raise a requests.exceptions.SSLError. This default behavior is crucial because it protects your application from connecting to malicious or compromised servers.

While urllib3 also provides SSL/TLS verification capabilities, requests abstracts away much of the underlying complexity, making it easier for developers to write secure code without needing deep knowledge of SSL intricacies.

For instance, requests automatically uses the certifi package if installed to provide a current list of trusted CA certificates, so you don’t have to manage them manually.

Handling Untrusted Certificates and Client Certificates

Sometimes, you might encounter scenarios where you need to interact with servers that use self-signed certificates or certificates from internal, non-public CAs.

While it’s generally discouraged to bypass SSL verification in production environments due to security risks, requests provides options for these specific cases:

Disabling SSL Verification Not Recommended for Production:

You can disable SSL verification by setting verify=False in your request call:
```
import requests


response = requests.get'https://example.com/untrusted_cert', verify=False
```
When verify=False, requests will issue a InsecureRequestWarning. This serves as a strong reminder that you are taking a security risk.

In environments where you might need to do this e.g., local development with self-signed certs, it’s best practice to suppress these warnings:
import urllib3

urllib3.disable_warningsurllib3.exceptions.InsecureRequestWarning




However, the far better approach is to provide `requests` with the path to your custom CA bundle using the `verify` parameter, pointing it to a `.pem` file containing the trusted certificate.

Client Certificates: Chromedp screenshot

For scenarios requiring two-way SSL authentication where the client also presents a certificate to the server, both urllib3 and requests support client certificates.

With requests, you provide a tuple containing the path to your client certificate and key:

Response = requests.get’https://example.com/secure_endpoint‘, cert=’/path/to/client.crt’, ‘/path/to/client.key’

This is common in enterprise environments or for highly secure API integrations where mutual TLS is required.

In summary, while urllib3 gives you granular control over SSL contexts, requests makes secure practices the default and provides convenient ways to handle exceptions when necessary, all while prioritizing user safety.

Always prioritize HTTPS and proper certificate verification in your applications.

Extensibility and Customization: Beyond the Basics

Both urllib3 and requests offer varying degrees of extensibility and customization, allowing developers to adapt their behavior to specific needs.

This is where the underlying architecture of urllib3 truly shines for advanced use cases, while requests provides a more accessible layer for common customizations.

Understanding how to extend these libraries can be crucial for building sophisticated network applications, from custom authentication schemes to complex proxy setups.

Custom Adapters and Middleware in `requests`

requests introduces the concept of HTTP Adapters, which are a powerful mechanism for customizing how requests are sent. An adapter is essentially a pluggable system that handles the transport for requests. By default, requests uses a HTTPAdapter that leverages urllib3 for its actual HTTP requests. Akamai 403

You can mount custom adapters to a requests.Session object, allowing you to define specific behaviors for different URL prefixes. This is incredibly useful for:

Implementing Custom Retry Logic: As discussed, mounting an HTTPAdapter with urllib3.util.Retry is the standard way to configure retries in requests.
Custom Transport Mechanisms: While less common, you could theoretically build an adapter that uses a completely different underlying transport e.g., for IPC, or a custom protocol instead of urllib3.
Logging and Metrics: You can create an adapter to log details of requests and responses, or to collect performance metrics before and after the actual HTTP call.
Proxies with Complex Logic: If your proxy requirements go beyond simple proxies dictionary, you might build a custom adapter.

Here’s an example of how you might use a custom adapter for retries, demonstrating the power of requests‘ extensibility:

import requests
from requests.adapters import HTTPAdapter
from urllib3.util.retry import Retry

# Configure retry strategy
retry_strategy = Retry
   total=3,  # Total retries
   status_forcelist=, # Which status codes to retry on
   allowed_methods=, # Which HTTP methods to retry
   backoff_factor=1 # Time delay between retries


# Create an HTTPAdapter with the retry strategy
adapter = HTTPAdaptermax_retries=retry_strategy

# Create a session and mount the adapter for all HTTP/HTTPS requests
with requests.Session as session:
    session.mount"http://", adapter
    session.mount"https://", adapter

    try:
       response = session.get"https://httpbin.org/status/503" # This will trigger a retry


       printf"Status Code: {response.status_code}"
    except requests.exceptions.RetryError as e:


       printf"Request failed after retries: {e}"

This pattern allows you to inject custom logic into the request lifecycle at a very high level, without needing to modify the core requests library.

Lower-Level Control with `urllib3`: Fine-tuning Your Requests

For developers who need absolute control over every aspect of the HTTP connection, urllib3 provides the granular access that requests intentionally abstracts away. This level of control is typically required for:

Custom Connection Pooling: While requests uses urllib3‘s pooling, you might want to create multiple distinct PoolManager instances with different configurations e.g., separate pools for different hosts, or pools with varying maxsize or block.
Direct Socket Interaction Rare: Although not a common use case, urllib3 exposes lower-level components that could, in theory, be swapped or modified for highly specialized networking scenarios.
Building Your Own HTTP Client: If you’re developing a library that needs a minimalist HTTP client without the overhead of requests, or you want to build a client with very specific error handling or proxy logic from scratch, urllib3 is your starting point.
Debugging and Inspection: urllib3‘s modular design makes it easier to inspect the exact bytes being sent and received, which can be invaluable for deep debugging of network issues.

For example, directly configuring a PoolManager with a specific timeout for all connections in that pool:

import urllib3

Create a PoolManager with a specific timeout for all connections

Http = urllib3.PoolManagertimeout=urllib3.Timeoutconnect=2.0, read=5.0

try:

response = http.request'GET', 'https://example.com', retries=3
 printf"Status: {response.status}"

except urllib3.exceptions.NewConnectionError as e:
printf”Connection failed: {e}”
except urllib3.exceptions.MaxRetryError as e:
printf”Request failed after retries: {e}”

This direct interaction with urllib3 components gives you the power to fine-tune network behavior precisely, which is why it’s the backend for many other high-level network libraries and frameworks in Python. Rust html parser

When to Choose Which: Making the Right Call

Deciding between urllib3 and requests boils down to a single principle: the level of abstraction you need for your task. Both are excellent libraries, but they serve different purposes and cater to different developer needs. Think of it like choosing between driving an automatic car requests and a manual one urllib3. The automatic is simpler for most commutes, but the manual gives you more control for specialized driving.

Opt for `requests` When…

You should reach for requests in the vast majority of scenarios involving HTTP interactions. It’s designed for developer productivity, ease of use, and quick iteration.

You need to interact with web APIs RESTful, GraphQL, etc.: This is the quintessential requests use case. It handles JSON, authentication, headers, and parameters seamlessly.
- Example: Fetching weather data from OpenWeatherMap API, posting data to a serverless function, or integrating with a SaaS product’s API.
You are doing web scraping for data: While requests isn’t a full-fledged scraper like Scrapy, it’s perfect for fetching HTML content before parsing it with BeautifulSoup.
- Example: Downloading a webpage to extract specific links or text.
You want readable, concise code: The API is highly intuitive and self-documenting, making your code easier to write, understand, and maintain.
- Example: Compare requests.get'url', params={'key': 'value'} with the equivalent urllib3 construction involving encoding query parameters manually.
You need automatic handling of common HTTP features: Cookies, sessions, redirects, and content decompression are handled out-of-the-box.
- Example: Maintaining a login session across multiple requests to a website.
You prioritize speed of development: For scripts, prototypes, or applications where getting the job done quickly and reliably is key, requests is the clear winner.
- Example: A simple script to check the uptime of several websites.
You’re a beginner to network programming in Python: requests offers a gentle learning curve and sensible defaults, reducing the chances of common network programming errors.

According to a Stack Overflow Developer Survey, requests is consistently cited as one of the most loved and used Python libraries, demonstrating its widespread acceptance and utility among developers for everyday tasks.

Choose `urllib3` When…

urllib3 is your go-to when you need fine-grained control, are building another library, or optimizing for specific performance characteristics at a lower level.

You are building a lower-level library or framework: If you’re developing something that needs to be an HTTP client itself like requests is, or a proxy, urllib3 provides the necessary building blocks.
- Example: Developing a custom caching proxy, or a new ORM that needs its own HTTP transport layer.
You need explicit control over connection pooling: While requests uses urllib3‘s pooling, you might need to manage multiple distinct pools with different configurations for very specific performance tuning.
- Example: Maintaining separate connection pools with different timeout settings for different groups of target servers.
You require very specific control over SSL/TLS context: For highly specialized security requirements that go beyond requests‘ verify parameter.
- Example: Pinning specific certificates, using custom SSL contexts for enterprise security appliances.
You are debugging deeply into network issues: Because urllib3 is closer to the metal, it can be easier to understand exactly what’s happening at the HTTP message level.
- Example: Inspecting raw HTTP headers and body bytes for a tricky integration issue.
You are resource-constrained and need minimal overhead: While requests is light, urllib3 is even lighter if you truly only need raw HTTP functionality without any of the added conveniences.
- Example: Embedded systems or environments with very tight memory footprints.
You prefer explicit over implicit: If you want to manually manage redirects, retries, and sessions without the automated helpers, urllib3 gives you that control.

In essence, if you’re writing an application that uses web services, use requests. If you’re writing a library that provides web service capabilities or needs deep control over HTTP transport, urllib3 is your foundation. The beauty is, you often get the best of both worlds with requests leveraging urllib3 under the hood.

The Relationship: `requests` Built on `urllib3`

It’s crucial to understand that requests and urllib3 are not mutually exclusive competitors. rather, they exist in a hierarchical relationship. requests is built directly on top of urllib3. This means that when you use requests for your HTTP operations, urllib3 is doing the heavy lifting behind the scenes. Think of urllib3 as the robust, low-level engine and requests as the polished, user-friendly car designed to make driving that engine effortless. This architectural choice provides developers with the best of both worlds: the raw power and efficiency of urllib3 combined with the simplicity and convenience of requests. This layered approach is a testament to good software design, allowing each library to specialize in its domain.

How `requests` Utilizes `urllib3`

When you issue a command like requests.get'https://example.com', a lot happens under the hood, and urllib3 plays a central role:

Session Management: requests uses Session objects to persist parameters across requests. Each Session object internally manages its own urllib3.PoolManager. This PoolManager is responsible for handling connection pooling, retries, and proxy settings.
Connection Pooling: When you make multiple requests to the same host using a requests.Session or even implicitly, as requests manages a default session, urllib3 reuses the underlying TCP connections from its connection pool, significantly boosting performance.
SSL/TLS Verification: requests leverages urllib3‘s robust SSL/TLS verification capabilities. When you set verify=True the default, urllib3 performs the certificate validation, hostname verification, and handles trusted CA bundles. requests simply exposes this functionality via a simpler API.
Retries and Redirection: While requests handles redirects automatically and provides raise_for_status, urllib3 provides the foundational mechanisms for retries via urllib3.util.Retry and low-level redirect following that requests then wraps and streamlines.
Proxy Support: requests‘ elegant proxy configuration is directly translated into urllib3‘s proxy handling.
HTTP Adapters: As discussed, requests uses HTTPAdapter instances, which fundamentally route requests through urllib3‘s PoolManager. When you mount a custom adapter, you’re often configuring how urllib3 is used by that specific adapter.

This seamless integration means that by using requests, you’re implicitly benefiting from urllib3‘s reliability, performance optimizations, and security features without needing to manage them directly.

It truly abstracts away the “nitty-gritty” details of HTTP networking.

When to Bypass `requests` and Go Direct to `urllib3`

Despite the elegance of requests, there are specific, advanced scenarios where interacting directly with urllib3 becomes necessary or more efficient: Botasaurus

Building Custom HTTP Clients from Scratch: If you are developing a new Python library or framework that requires a minimal HTTP client and you don’t want the requests dependency or its opinions, urllib3 is the base layer.
Extreme Performance Tuning: For highly specialized applications where every millisecond and byte matters, you might gain marginal improvements by directly configuring urllib3‘s PoolManager and connection_pool parameters more aggressively than requests might allow easily. This is rare for most applications, but relevant for very high-throughput systems.
Uncommon Network Topologies: If you have highly unusual network configurations e.g., specific socket options, very complex proxy chains that requests doesn’t directly support, or custom connection handling where urllib3‘s lower-level access is required.
Deep Debugging: When diagnosing extremely complex network issues, stepping through urllib3‘s code or directly interacting with its components might reveal insights that requests‘ higher-level abstraction obscures.
Integrating with Existing urllib3-based Codebases: If you’re working within an older project that already relies heavily on urllib3, continuing with it for consistency might be sensible rather than introducing requests.

In essence, requests is the go-to for the vast majority of web interactions in Python, providing a user-friendly and feature-rich experience.

urllib3 is the powerful, lower-level toolkit that requests leverages, offering granular control for those niche, advanced scenarios where precise network manipulation is paramount.

For 99% of developers, requests is the right choice, enabling them to focus on their application logic rather than network plumbing.

Future Trends and Maintenance: Staying Relevant

Both urllib3 and requests are actively maintained and continuously updated to keep pace with these changes, ensuring they remain relevant and secure tools for Python developers.

Their commitment to ongoing development is crucial for any project that relies on external dependencies, as it guarantees compatibility, security patches, and performance improvements over time.

For example, the rapid adoption of HTTP/2 and the deprecation of older TLS versions like TLS 1.0/1.1 necessitate continuous updates to HTTP client libraries.

Active Development and Community Support

Both urllib3 and requests boast vibrant and active development communities, which is a strong indicator of their health and future viability.

requests:
- Maintainers: The project has been stewarded by key maintainers after Kenneth Reitz stepped back, ensuring its continuity.
- Release Cadence: requests typically follows a steady release cycle, introducing new features, bug fixes, and security patches. Major releases like requests 2.x have seen significant improvements.
- Community: It has an enormous user base, leading to extensive community support through Stack Overflow, GitHub issues, and various forums. This means problems are often quickly identified and solutions are readily available.
- Documentation: requests is renowned for its excellent, user-friendly documentation, which greatly contributes to its adoption and ease of use.
urllib3:
- Maintainers: urllib3 also has dedicated core maintainers who are actively involved in its development.
- Release Cadence: Releases are frequent, often incorporating upstream changes from various HTTP/network standards and addressing underlying Python compatibility issues. Recent efforts include improved HTTP/2 compatibility and support for new compression algorithms.
- Community: While its community is smaller than requests as it’s a lower-level library, it’s highly technical and active, contributing to its robust and reliable nature.
- Importance: Given its foundational role, security vulnerabilities or performance issues in urllib3 would have widespread impact, which drives its rigorous testing and maintenance.

Regular security audits and prompt patching of vulnerabilities are a standard practice for both libraries, which is vital for any application handling sensitive data over the network.

Embracing New Standards HTTP/2, QUIC, TLS 1.3

The world of HTTP is not static.

HTTP/2 brought significant performance improvements over HTTP/1.1, and QUIC which powers HTTP/3 is poised to revolutionize web transport by building on UDP instead of TCP. Selenium nodejs

Modern TLS versions like TLS 1.3 offer enhanced security and performance.

HTTP/2: While urllib3 and requests primarily focus on HTTP/1.1 by default, both projects recognize the importance of HTTP/2. There are ongoing discussions and community efforts to integrate HTTP/2 support more directly or via compatible third-party libraries. For example, requests can already use the hyper or h2 libraries to enable HTTP/2 if needed, though it requires additional configuration.
QUIC/HTTP/3: This is a more significant shift, requiring a fundamental change in the transport layer. While not directly supported by urllib3 or requests out-of-the-box today as it’s still relatively new and complex, it’s a trend that core Python networking libraries will need to address in the coming years. Efforts are often seen in experimental or dedicated libraries first, which then might get integrated or become a backend for urllib3/requests.
TLS 1.3: Both urllib3 and requests benefit from Python’s standard library ssl module, which gains support for newer TLS versions as they are integrated into Python itself. Thus, as you upgrade your Python version, urllib3 and requests automatically inherit support for the latest TLS standards, ensuring your connections remain secure and performant.

The continuous evolution of these libraries, driven by active maintenance and a keen eye on emerging web standards, ensures that urllib3 and requests will remain indispensable tools for Python developers for the foreseeable future.

Choosing either gives you a well-supported, future-proof solution for your HTTP communication needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference between urllib3 and requests?

The primary difference is their level of abstraction: urllib3 is a low-level HTTP client library providing foundational features like connection pooling and retries, while requests is a high-level, user-friendly library built on top of urllib3 that simplifies common HTTP operations with an intuitive API.

Is requests just a wrapper around urllib3?

Yes, requests is essentially a wrapper around urllib3. It uses urllib3 as its underlying HTTP client to handle the actual network communication, but it adds a layer of convenience, sensible defaults, and a much more human-friendly API.

Which library should I use for simple web scraping?

For simple web scraping, requests is generally the recommended choice.

Its ease of use, automatic handling of cookies, redirects, and headers makes fetching web pages straightforward before you parse them with a library like BeautifulSoup.

When would I choose urllib3 over requests?

You would choose urllib3 when you need fine-grained control over HTTP connections, are building another HTTP library or framework, require explicit connection pooling management, or need to debug network issues at a lower level. It’s for more advanced, foundational use cases.

Does urllib3 handle connection pooling?

Yes, urllib3 is explicitly designed for efficient connection pooling.

It reuses TCP connections for multiple requests to the same host, significantly reducing overhead and improving performance compared to opening a new connection for each request. Captcha proxies

Do I need to install urllib3 if I install requests?

No, you do not need to install urllib3 separately if you install requests. requests lists urllib3 as a dependency, so pip will automatically install urllib3 for you when you install requests.

How does requests handle SSL verification?

requests handles SSL verification by default for HTTPS requests.

It leverages urllib3 to verify the server’s SSL certificate against a list of trusted Certificate Authorities CAs. If the verification fails, it raises an SSLError.

Can I disable SSL verification with requests?

Yes, you can disable SSL verification in requests by setting the verify=False parameter in your request call e.g., requests.geturl, verify=False. However, this is generally not recommended for production environments as it exposes your application to security risks like Man-in-the-Middle attacks.

How do I set a timeout for a request in Python?

With requests, you set a timeout using the timeout parameter e.g., requests.geturl, timeout=5 for a 5-second timeout. With urllib3, you can specify timeout when creating a PoolManager or on individual requests, using a float or a urllib3.Timeout object for more granular connect/read timeouts.

Can requests handle retries for failed requests?

Yes, requests can handle retries for failed requests.

You achieve this by creating a requests.adapters.HTTPAdapter with a urllib3.util.retry.Retry object and mounting it to a requests.Session instance.

This allows you to configure automatic retries on specific HTTP status codes or connection errors.

Is urllib3 thread-safe?

Yes, urllib3 is designed to be thread-safe.

Its connection pooling mechanism is implemented in a way that allows multiple threads to safely share and reuse connections without race conditions, making it suitable for concurrent applications. Curl impersonate

Can I upload files using both urllib3 and requests?

Yes, both libraries support file uploads.

requests simplifies this with the files parameter e.g., requests.posturl, files={'file': open'report.txt', 'rb'}, which handles multipart encoding automatically.

urllib3 also supports multipart encoding for file uploads directly via its fields parameter.

Which library is generally faster?

While urllib3 operates at a lower level and can potentially be marginally faster in highly optimized, low-overhead scenarios due to less abstraction, for most practical applications, the performance difference between urllib3 and requests is negligible.

requests inherits urllib3‘s performance benefits like connection pooling, making it highly efficient for typical use cases.

Can I use proxies with urllib3 and requests?

Yes, both libraries support proxies.

requests makes it very easy with a proxies dictionary parameter e.g., requests.geturl, proxies={'http': 'http://proxy.example.com'}. urllib3 supports proxies by passing proxy_url when creating a PoolManager or using ProxyManager.

How do I handle JSON responses with requests?

requests makes handling JSON responses incredibly easy.

After making a request, if the response contains JSON data, you can simply call response.json to parse the JSON string into a Python dictionary or list. This is a common pattern for API interactions.

What is the `Session` object in requests used for?

The requests.Session object is used to persist certain parameters across multiple requests. Aiohttp proxy

This includes cookies, HTTP headers, authentication credentials, and connection pooling.

Using a Session object is highly recommended for making multiple requests to the same host, as it significantly improves performance by reusing underlying TCP connections.

Does urllib3 support HTTP/2?

While urllib3 primarily focuses on HTTP/1.1, there are community efforts and third-party libraries like hyper or h2 that can integrate HTTP/2 support with urllib3 or requests. Direct, built-in HTTP/2 support is an area of ongoing development for core Python HTTP libraries.

What is `InsecureRequestWarning` in requests?

InsecureRequestWarning is a warning issued by requests originating from urllib3 when you make an HTTPS request with SSL verification explicitly disabled verify=False. It’s a strong indicator that you are bypassing a critical security check and should be addressed in production code.

Can I customize headers with both libraries?

Yes, both libraries allow you to customize HTTP headers.

With requests, you pass a dictionary to the headers parameter e.g., requests.geturl, headers={'User-Agent': 'MyCustomAgent'}. urllib3 also accepts a headers dictionary on its request method.

Which library is better for building a high-performance web server?

Neither urllib3 nor requests are designed for building high-performance web servers. They are client-side HTTP libraries.

For building web servers, you would typically use frameworks like Flask, Django, FastAPI, or asynchronous frameworks likeiohttp, which provide server-side HTTP handling.

Undetected chromedriver user agent

Urllib3 vs requests