Elsevier.com Reviews

Based on looking at the website, Elsevier.com is a formidable player in the world of scientific, technical, and medical STM publishing.

It’s a platform designed to serve researchers, healthcare professionals, and institutions, aiming to advance science and improve healthcare outcomes.

Think of it as a massive, well-organized library and knowledge hub, but with a tech-forward approach that includes AI-powered tools and vast databases.

The site is clearly built to facilitate discovery, publishing, and informed decision-making within the academic and healthcare sectors.

For anyone involved in serious research, from a university student working on their thesis to a seasoned medical professional seeking the latest clinical guidelines, Elsevier.com presents itself as an essential resource.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Elsevier.com Reviews Latest Discussions & Reviews:

It offers a wide array of products and services, from journals and books to advanced analytical tools.

The emphasis is consistently on high-quality data, integrity in research, and leveraging technology like AI to streamline the research journey. This isn’t just about reading papers.

It’s about connecting with a global knowledge network and contributing to the collective human understanding of science and medicine.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Elsevier.com Review & First Look

Upon a first glance at Elsevier.com, the immediate impression is one of professionalism and depth.

The website clearly positions itself as a global leader in information and analytics for the scientific and medical communities.

Its design is clean and intuitive, guiding users to key sections like “Publish with us,” “Discover products,” and “Shop books & journals.”

User Interface and Navigation

The user interface UI is designed for efficiency, minimizing clutter and prioritizing content access.

Key navigation elements are logically placed, making it relatively straightforward for users to find what they’re looking for, whether it’s a specific journal article, a product offering, or career opportunities.

• Clean Layout: The homepage uses ample white space, making content digestible.
• Prominent Search Bar: A highly visible search function is critical for a content-heavy site like Elsevier, and it’s well-implemented.
• Category-Based Browsing: Options like “Academic & Government,” “Health,” and “Industry” help segment their vast offerings.

Initial Impressions of Content Quality

The content itself, even from just the homepage snippets, speaks to high academic and professional standards.

Mentions of “advancing research for the benefit of society” and “curate and enrich research with high-quality data and analytics” signal a commitment to rigorous, evidence-based information.

• Focus on Research Integrity: The site highlights initiatives like “Fraud fighters: How experts and technology advance research integrity,” which is crucial for maintaining trust in scientific publications.
• AI Integration: The prominent display of “Explore ScienceDirect AI,” “Trial ClinicalKey AI now,” and “Discover Sherpath AI” indicates a forward-thinking approach to leveraging technology for research.
• Diverse Topics: Featured topics range from “Sustainability” and “Open science” to “Healthcare & Medicine” and “Research leadership,” showing a broad scope of interests.

Elsevier.com Features

Elsevier.com offers an extensive suite of features tailored to the needs of researchers, educators, and healthcare professionals.

These features are designed to support every stage of the research lifecycle, from discovery and analysis to publishing and career development.

Research and Discovery Tools

Elsevier provides powerful tools to help users efficiently find, analyze, and synthesize information from its vast repositories. Warrensbakery.co.uk Reviews

• ScienceDirect: This is perhaps their flagship content platform, offering access to over 16 million articles and 2,500 journals, plus nearly 40,000 books. It’s a goldmine for peer-reviewed literature across virtually all scientific disciplines.
  • Smart Search: Advanced search capabilities, including filters by publication type, date, and subject area.
  • AI-Powered Insights: Features like “ScienceDirect AI” aim to help researchers uncover connections and insights faster.
  • Citation Tracking: Essential for understanding research impact and identifying key papers.
  • Author Profiles: Detailed profiles help researchers track their publications and collaborations.
• ClinicalKey: Tailored for healthcare professionals, ClinicalKey provides evidence-based clinical answers, medical textbooks, journals, practice guidelines, and multimedia resources at the point of care.
  • Quick Answers: Designed for rapid access to clinical information.
  • Patient Education Materials: Resources to help healthcare providers explain conditions and treatments to patients.

Publishing Services and Support

For authors, Elsevier offers a robust ecosystem for submitting, peer-reviewing, and publishing research.

• Journal Finder: A tool that helps authors select the most appropriate journal for their manuscript by matching keywords and abstracts to relevant Elsevier journals.
• Author Services: Provides resources on manuscript preparation, submission guidelines, peer review processes, and open access options.
  • Editorial Manager: The system used for manuscript submission and tracking throughout the peer review process.
  • Ethical Guidelines: Clear guidelines on publication ethics, crucial for maintaining research integrity.
• Open Access Options: Elsevier supports various open access models, allowing authors to make their research freely available, often for a fee Article Processing Charge.

Data and Analytics Solutions

Beyond content, Elsevier provides tools for research evaluation and management, helping institutions and funders make informed decisions.

• SciVal: A web-based analytics solution that offers quick, easy access to the research performance of over 23,000 research institutions and 220 countries worldwide. It helps identify strengths, discover collaborations, and analyze trends.
  • Benchmarking: Compare research performance against peers or national averages.
  • Collaboration Identification: Identify potential research partners based on their expertise and output.
• Pure: A research information management system designed to aggregate and manage an institution’s research output, activities, and achievements. It helps universities showcase their research impact.
  • Reporting Tools: Generate reports on research productivity and impact for funding bodies and internal stakeholders.
  • Researcher Profiles: Create comprehensive profiles for faculty, highlighting their contributions.

Career and Professional Development

Elsevier also extends its reach to career development, particularly within the academic and healthcare sectors.

• Careers at Elsevier: The website features a dedicated section for job opportunities within Elsevier itself, highlighting its workplace culture, diversity initiatives, and employee benefits.
  • Diversity & Inclusion: Showcases data snapshots and awards related to inclusion and diversity, appealing to a broad talent pool.
  • Work-Life Balance: Explicitly mentions recognition for work-life balance, indicating a supportive environment.
• Early Career Researcher Resources: Connects aspiring academics with essential publishing skills and advice, recognizing the challenges faced by those starting their research journey.

Elsevier.com Pros & Cons

Elsevier.com, despite its dominance, comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.

It’s important to weigh these to understand if it aligns with individual or institutional needs.

Pros: Unparalleled Access and Advanced Tools

Elsevier’s strengths lie in its extensive content, sophisticated tools, and commitment to research integrity.

• Vast Content Repository:
  • Sheer Volume: With millions of articles and thousands of journals, Elsevier’s ScienceDirect offers one of the largest collections of peer-reviewed scientific and medical literature globally. This is a massive advantage for comprehensive research.
  • Multidisciplinary Coverage: Covers virtually every scientific, technical, and medical discipline, making it a one-stop shop for diverse research needs.
• High-Quality, Peer-Reviewed Information:
  • Rigorous Peer Review: Elsevier journals are known for their stringent peer-review processes, which helps ensure the quality, validity, and integrity of published research.
  • Impact Factor: Many Elsevier journals consistently rank high in impact factor, indicating their influence and credibility within their respective fields. For example, The Lancet, a leading medical journal published by Elsevier, has an impact factor often above 200, highlighting its significant influence.
• Advanced Research Tools and Analytics:
  • AI Integration: Tools like ScienceDirect AI and ClinicalKey AI leverage artificial intelligence to enhance discovery, speed up literature reviews, and provide clinical insights, saving researchers significant time.
  • Bibliometric Tools Scopus, SciVal: These platforms are indispensable for analyzing research trends, identifying influential authors and institutions, and benchmarking research performance. Scopus, for instance, indexes over 89 million records, providing robust data for bibliometric analysis.
  • Efficiency: These tools collectively streamline the research process from literature discovery to publication.
• Strong Emphasis on Research Integrity:
  • Fraud Detection: Elsevier actively promotes and develops tools to detect and prevent research misconduct, plagiarism, and fraudulent data.
  • Ethical Guidelines: Clear guidelines for authors, reviewers, and editors reinforce ethical publishing practices, which is crucial for maintaining trust in scientific output.
• Global Reach and Impact:
  • International Collaborations: Elsevier supports a global network of researchers and institutions, fostering international collaboration and dissemination of knowledge.
  • Career Opportunities: Offers diverse career paths within the company, appealing to professionals seeking roles in academic publishing and technology.

Cons: Cost, Open Access Concerns, and Market Dominance

Despite its strengths, Elsevier faces criticism, particularly concerning its pricing model and its significant market influence.

• High Subscription Costs:
  • Institutional Burden: University libraries and institutions often bear substantial costs for Elsevier journal subscriptions, sometimes amounting to millions of dollars annually. This can strain budgets, especially for smaller institutions. A 2019 report by the University of California system estimated their spending on journal subscriptions at around $10 million annually, with a significant portion going to Elsevier.
  • Individual Access Barriers: For independent researchers or those outside institutions with subscriptions, accessing individual articles can be prohibitively expensive, often costing upwards of $30-$50 per article.
• Open Access Debates and Article Processing Charges APCs:
  • “Double Dipping” Criticism: Elsevier, like other major publishers, has been criticized for charging high subscription fees while also charging authors hefty APCs often ranging from $1,500 to $9,000 per article for open-access publishing. Critics argue this amounts to “double dipping.”
  • Equity Concerns: High APCs can create barriers for researchers from less-funded institutions or developing countries to publish their work open access, potentially limiting knowledge dissemination.
• Market Dominance and Monopoly Concerns:
  • Concentration of Power: Elsevier’s dominant market share estimated to be around 25-30% of all scientific articles published globally raises concerns about its influence on pricing, publishing standards, and access to research.
  • Impact on Libraries: This dominance can give them significant leverage in negotiations with libraries, sometimes leading to less favorable terms for institutions.
  • Lack of Competition: The market concentration can limit competition among publishers, potentially reducing incentives for innovation or lower pricing.
• User Experience Minor Points:
  • Complexity of Features: While powerful, the sheer number of tools and platforms ScienceDirect, Scopus, SciVal, ClinicalKey can be overwhelming for new users, requiring a learning curve.
  • Reliance on Subscriptions: The core value proposition heavily relies on institutional subscriptions, making direct individual access challenging and costly.

Elsevier.com Alternatives

These platforms vary in their focus, content scope, and business models.

Open Access Repositories and Publishers

These alternatives prioritize making research freely available, often supported by institutions, grants, or author fees APCs.

• PubMed Central PMC:
  • Focus: A free full-text archive of biomedical and life sciences journal literature at the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s National Library of Medicine NIH/NLM.
  • Content: Contains over 7 million articles from thousands of journals, including many that are also indexed in PubMed. It’s a goldmine for health and life sciences research.
  • Pros: Absolutely free access, highly reliable source, extensive content in its niche.
  • Cons: Primarily biomedical. not as broad as Elsevier’s multidisciplinary coverage.
• arXiv:
  • Focus: A free distribution service and open-access archive for preprints of scientific papers in physics, mathematics, computer science, quantitative biology, quantitative finance, statistics, electrical engineering and systems science, and economics.
  • Content: Millions of preprints, meaning they haven’t necessarily undergone formal peer review yet.
  • Pros: Rapid dissemination of new research, free to access and submit, covers cutting-edge work before formal publication.
  • Cons: Content is not peer-reviewed, so users must exercise caution and critical evaluation.
• PLOS Public Library of Science:
  • Focus: A non-profit open-access publisher, with a mission to accelerate progress in science and medicine by leading a transformation in research communication.
  • Content: Publishes a suite of peer-reviewed open-access journals across various scientific and medical disciplines e.g., PLOS ONE, PLOS Biology, PLOS Medicine.
  • Pros: All content is open access. high-quality peer review. strong commitment to open science principles.
  • Cons: Relies on Article Processing Charges APCs from authors, which can be a barrier for some.
• Directory of Open Access Journals DOAJ:
  • Focus: A community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals.
  • Content: Lists over 19,000 open access journals covering all areas of science, technology, medicine, social sciences, arts, and humanities. It’s a directory, not a content host.
  • Pros: Excellent resource for discovering legitimate open access journals. strict criteria for inclusion ensures quality.
  • Cons: Does not host content directly. users are redirected to publishers’ sites.

Commercial Publishers and Research Platforms

These are direct competitors offering similar services, often with subscription-based models. Bookmakersreview.com Reviews

• Springer Nature:
  • Focus: A major global publisher providing high-quality content in various academic and professional fields, including science, technology, medicine, and humanities.
  • Content: Publishes thousands of journals e.g., Nature, Scientific Reports and books, similar in scope to Elsevier.
  • Pros: Prestigious journals, extensive content, strong commitment to research integrity.
  • Cons: Similar pricing models and open access complexities to Elsevier.
• Wiley Online Library:
  • Focus: Another prominent global publisher offering a vast collection of scholarly journals, books, and online resources across scientific, technical, medical, and scholarly disciplines.
  • Content: Hosts content from thousands of journals, including many society-published journals, and a large collection of e-books.
  • Pros: Broad disciplinary coverage, strong partnerships with academic societies, reliable platform.
  • Cons: Also subscription-based, similar cost implications for institutions and individuals.
• Taylor & Francis Online:
  • Focus: A leading international academic publisher, publishing over 2,700 journals and 7,000 new books each year, with a strong presence in humanities, social sciences, and STEM.
  • Content: Diverse content across a wide array of subjects.
  • Pros: Particularly strong in social sciences and humanities, large volume of content.
  • Cons: Primarily subscription-based, similar access challenges to other commercial publishers.

Research-Oriented Social Networks and Academic Search Engines

These platforms facilitate discovery and connection among researchers, often linking to external content.

• Google Scholar:
  • Focus: A freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
  • Content: Aggregates articles, theses, books, abstracts, and court opinions from academic publishers, professional societies, online repositories, universities, and other web sites.
  • Pros: Extremely broad coverage, excellent for initial literature searches, provides citation counts and links to full text where available.
  • Cons: Quality control can be an issue indexes preprints, non-peer-reviewed content. relies on external links for full text, which may require subscriptions.
• ResearchGate:
  • Focus: A social networking site for scientists and researchers to share papers, ask and answer questions, and find collaborators.
  • Content: Researchers can upload their published papers often preprints or accepted manuscripts if copyright allows, data, and research notes.
  • Pros: Facilitates direct communication with authors, often provides access to preprints or earlier versions of papers, good for finding collaborators.
  • Cons: Content uploaded by users may not always be the final peer-reviewed version. copyright issues can arise if authors share publisher PDFs.

How to Cancel Elsevier.com Subscription

Canceling an Elsevier.com subscription, particularly for institutional access, typically involves a formal process that goes beyond a simple click of a button.

For individual users who might have personal subscriptions to specific journals or tools, the process is generally more straightforward.

Institutional Subscriptions

For universities, hospitals, or research organizations, canceling an Elsevier subscription usually involves negotiation and formal communication with Elsevier’s sales or account management team.

These are often multi-year contracts with significant financial implications.

1. Review Contract Terms: The first and most crucial step is to meticulously review the existing contract with Elsevier. This document will outline the notice period required for cancellation, any early termination clauses, and renewal terms. Contracts often specify a 6-12 month notice period before the end of the subscription term for non-renewal.
2. Contact Elsevier Account Manager: Reach out to the dedicated Elsevier account manager or institutional sales representative. They are the primary point of contact for all contractual matters.
3. Formal Written Notice: Provide a formal written notice of non-renewal or cancellation within the timeframe specified in the contract. This is critical to avoid automatic renewal and ensure the cancellation is legally binding. This notice should clearly state the intention to terminate the subscription and reference the contract number and end date.
4. Negotiation Optional but Common: Institutions often enter a phase of negotiation. Elsevier may offer alternative packages, reduced pricing, or different subscription models to retain the institution as a client. This is a common part of the process, and institutions may leverage open access demands or budget constraints in these discussions.
5. Data and Access Post-Cancellation: Discuss what access, if any, will remain for previously subscribed content. Many institutional contracts include perpetual access rights to content published during the subscription period often referred to as “archival rights” or “post-termination access”. Ensure this is clearly understood and documented.

Key considerations for institutions:

• Budget Cycles: Align cancellation efforts with institutional budget cycles, as major subscription decisions are often made well in advance.
• User Impact: Consider the impact on researchers and students. Institutions often explore alternative access options or open access initiatives before committing to cancellation.
• Consortium Agreements: If the subscription is part of a consortium, the cancellation process may involve the consortium lead rather than direct institutional negotiation.

Individual Subscriptions or Products

For individual users who might have subscribed to a specific journal, an online course, or a specialized tool like ClinicalKey for personal use, the cancellation process is typically managed through their online account.

1. Log In to Your Account: Go to Elsevier.com or the specific product’s portal e.g., ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey, or the individual journal’s website and log in using your credentials.
2. Navigate to “My Account” or “Subscriptions”: Look for a section like “My Account,” “Subscription Management,” “Order History,” or “Settings.” These sections usually house information about your active subscriptions.
3. Locate the Subscription: Find the specific subscription you wish to cancel. There should be an option to “Cancel Subscription,” “Manage Subscription,” or “Turn off Auto-Renew.”
4. Follow On-Screen Prompts: The website will typically guide you through a few steps to confirm the cancellation. You may be asked for a reason for canceling.
5. Confirmation Email: After successful cancellation, you should receive a confirmation email. It’s advisable to keep this email for your records.

Important Notes for individuals:

• Auto-Renewal: Check if your subscription has an auto-renewal feature. If so, you’ll need to disable this to prevent future charges.
• Refund Policy: Review the refund policy associated with your specific purchase. Some subscriptions may offer a pro-rata refund if canceled mid-term, while others may not.
• Free Trials: If you’re on a free trial, simply not extending it or canceling before the trial period ends will prevent charges.

How to Cancel Elsevier.com Free Trial

Canceling a free trial on Elsevier.com platforms is usually a straightforward process designed to prevent users from being automatically charged once the trial period ends.

It’s crucial to act before the trial period expires to avoid unintended billing. Flightaware.com Reviews

1. Mark Your Calendar: The moment you sign up for a free trial, note the end date. This is your primary defense against unwanted charges. Most trials are 14 or 30 days.
2. Log In to the Specific Product Account: Elsevier offers trials for various products e.g., ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey, Sherpath AI. You’ll need to log into the account associated with that specific trial, not just the general Elsevier.com account.
3. Access Subscription or Account Settings:
   • Once logged in, navigate to your “Account Settings,” “Subscription,” “My Products,” or a similar section. The exact wording might vary slightly depending on the specific Elsevier platform you are trialing.
   • Look for phrases like “Manage Subscription,” “Billing Information,” or “Trial Status.”
4. Locate the Trial and Disable Auto-Renewal:
   • Within the subscription management area, you should see details about your active free trial.
   • There will typically be an option to “Cancel Trial,” “Disable Auto-Renewal,” or “Do Not Renew.” Select this option.
   • The goal is to prevent the trial from converting into a paid subscription.
5. Confirm Cancellation:
   • You might be prompted to confirm your decision or provide a reason for cancellation.
   • Complete these steps to finalize the process.
6. Receive Confirmation Email:
   • After successfully canceling, you should receive a confirmation email from Elsevier. This email is your proof of cancellation. Save it. If any charges appear later, this email will be vital evidence.
   • If you don’t receive a confirmation email within a few hours, check your spam folder or contact Elsevier’s customer support immediately.

Pro-Tip: If you’re unsure about canceling, sometimes logging in and simply navigating to the subscription settings can trigger a reminder or an offer to extend the trial, but it’s always better to be proactive. Setting a reminder a few days before the trial ends gives you a buffer to complete the cancellation process.

Elsevier.com Pricing

Elsevier’s pricing model is complex and primarily designed for institutional subscriptions rather than individual consumers.

Due to its extensive portfolio of journals, books, and analytical tools, there isn’t a single “Elsevier.com price.” Instead, pricing is highly customized, opaque, and varies significantly based on numerous factors.

Institutional Subscription Models Primary Revenue Stream

The vast majority of Elsevier’s revenue comes from libraries, universities, research institutions, and healthcare organizations purchasing access to its content and tools.

• Big Deals/Bundles:
  • Description: This is the most common model where institutions subscribe to large bundles of journals, often thousands, across multiple disciplines. These “big deals” offer access to a significant portion of Elsevier’s content.
  • Pricing: Negotiated directly with each institution. Factors include:
    • Size of Institution: Number of faculty, students, researchers.
    • Research Output: The institution’s past publication volume with Elsevier.
    • Historical Spending: Previous subscription levels and inflation rates.
    • Content Usage: How much content the institution’s users access.
  • Cost Implications: These deals can range from hundreds of thousands to several million dollars annually for large research universities. For example, a major university in the US might pay $2-$5 million per year for its Elsevier package.
  • Perpetual Access: Often includes “perpetual access rights” to content published during the subscription period, meaning access continues even if the subscription is canceled.
• Journal-Specific Subscriptions:
  • Description: Institutions can subscribe to individual journals if they don’t need or can’t afford a large bundle.
  • Pricing: Varies by journal impact factor, frequency of publication, and demand. Highly prestigious journals will naturally be more expensive.
• Product-Specific Licensing:
  • Description: Licensing for platforms like Scopus, SciVal, ClinicalKey, or specific e-book collections.
  • Pricing: Tailored to the institution’s size and specific needs. SciVal, for instance, is often priced based on the number of active researchers or departments it will serve within an institution.

Individual Access Pricing

While institutions are the primary clients, individuals can purchase access to specific articles or books.

• Article Purchase:
  • Pricing: Typically ranges from $30 to $50 per article for a single download. This model is generally not cost-effective for anyone needing more than a few articles.
• Book Purchase:
  • Pricing: Varies widely, from tens to hundreds of dollars for individual e-books or print copies, depending on the complexity and scope.
• Individual Journal Subscriptions:
  • Pricing: Some journals offer individual subscriptions, but these are often quite expensive for personal budgets, usually hundreds of dollars per year for digital access to a single journal.

Article Processing Charges APCs for Open Access Publishing

For authors who wish to publish their research in an open-access format within an Elsevier journal, an Article Processing Charge APC is typically required.

• Pricing: APCs vary significantly by journal and discipline. They can range from $1,500 to over $9,000 per article.
  • For example, a prestigious journal like The Lancet might have an APC in the higher range, while a newer or more niche journal might be on the lower end.
• Purpose: These fees cover the costs associated with peer review, editorial work, production, hosting, and dissemination of the article, making it freely available to anyone.
• Funding: Authors often cover these fees through research grants, institutional funds, or specific open access funds.

Transparency and Negotiations

One of the most significant criticisms of Elsevier’s pricing is its lack of transparency.

Individual pricing details for institutional “big deals” are often kept confidential under Non-Disclosure Agreements NDAs, making it difficult for libraries to compare costs and negotiate effectively.

This lack of transparency has led to widespread protests and boycotts by researchers and institutions globally, advocating for more affordable and open access to scholarly literature.

The general trend in academic publishing, including with Elsevier, is a continuous negotiation between the publisher and institutions over subscription costs, access models e.g., transformative agreements that combine subscription and open access publishing fees, and the long-term sustainability of scholarly communication. Stempel-fabrik.de Reviews

Elsevier.com vs. Competitors

When evaluating Elsevier.com, it’s insightful to compare it against its main competitors in the academic publishing and research solutions space.

While each has its strengths, the core battle often revolves around content breadth, technological innovation, pricing models, and commitment to open science.

Elsevier vs. Springer Nature

• Elsevier:
  • Strengths:
    • Vast Content: Arguably the largest single publisher in terms of journal and article volume, particularly strong in science, technology, engineering, and medicine STEM. ScienceDirect is a massive repository.
    • Advanced Analytics: Leading tools like Scopus and SciVal for bibliometrics and research evaluation. ClinicalKey for clinical decision support.
    • Research Integrity: Strong emphasis and investment in tools to combat research misconduct.
  • Weaknesses: Often criticized for high subscription costs and less transparency in pricing.
    • Prestigious Journals: Publishes Nature and its family of journals, which are among the highest impact factor journals globally, particularly in life sciences and physical sciences.
    • Strong Open Access Portfolio: A pioneer in open access with BMC BioMed Central and Nature Communications. offers various open access options.
    • Books: A huge catalog of academic books, including textbooks and monographs.
  • Weaknesses: Also faces criticisms over high subscription costs for its traditional journals. content breadth slightly less than Elsevier in some STEM areas.
• Key Differentiator: While both are giants, Springer Nature is often seen as having a slightly more proactive stance on open access and boasts the unparalleled prestige of the Nature brand. Elsevier counters with sheer volume and powerful analytical tools.

Elsevier vs. Wiley John Wiley & Sons

*   Strengths: As above, extensive content, particularly strong in medical and scientific domains, robust analytical tools.
*   Weaknesses: Pricing issues, resistance to some open access models.

• Wiley:
  * Broad Disciplines: Strong presence across STEM, social sciences, humanities, and professional development.
  * Society Partnerships: Publishes a significant number of journals on behalf of academic and professional societies, giving it a strong connection to disciplinary communities.
  * Online Library: Wiley Online Library is a comprehensive platform for journals and books.
  • Weaknesses: Similar traditional publishing model, leading to similar criticisms regarding subscription costs. analytics tools are not as widely adopted as Elsevier’s Scopus/SciVal.
• Key Differentiator: Wiley’s strength often lies in its deep integration with academic societies and its broader disciplinary reach, particularly in fields beyond core STEM, while Elsevier’s focus remains heavily on its proprietary content and data analytics.

Elsevier vs. Google Scholar

*   Strengths: Curated, peer-reviewed content ScienceDirect, direct access to full text for subscribers, advanced search and analysis within its ecosystem, strong quality control.
*   Weaknesses: Paywalled content, high subscription costs, less democratic access.
    *   Free and Universal: Freely accessible to anyone with an internet connection, indexes scholarly content from virtually all publishers and repositories.
    *   Breadth of Search: Excellent for discovering diverse scholarly content, including preprints, theses, and university-hosted papers.
    *   Citation Tracking: Provides robust citation metrics and alerts.
*   Weaknesses: Lack of quality control indexes un-peer-reviewed content alongside peer-reviewed, relies on external links for full text often leading to paywalls, less sophisticated analytical tools compared to Scopus/SciVal.

• Key Differentiator: Google Scholar is a discovery tool offering breadth and accessibility, acting as a portal to scholarly literature from all sources. Elsevier is a content provider and platform, offering deep access and sophisticated tools within its curated ecosystem, primarily for paying subscribers. They serve different but complementary functions.

Elsevier vs. Open Access Platforms e.g., PubMed Central, PLOS

*   Strengths: Established journals, brand prestige, comprehensive content, analytical tools, traditional peer review.
*   Weaknesses: Subscription model, APCs can be high, perceived as less committed to fully open science.

• Open Access OA Platforms:
  * Free Access: All content is freely available to read, download, and share, fostering wider dissemination of knowledge.
  * Innovation: Often at the forefront of new publishing models, such as immediate open access.
  * Equity: Removes financial barriers to accessing research, beneficial for researchers in developing countries or those without institutional access.
  • Weaknesses:
    • Sustainability: Rely on APCs or institutional support, which can be challenging to sustain. some smaller OA journals may struggle with funding.
    • Quality Perception: While many OA journals are highly reputable e.g., PLOS journals, some predatory journals exploit the OA model, leading to skepticism among some researchers.
    • Content Breadth: Individual OA publishers or repositories may not match the sheer volume of content of a single large commercial publisher.
• Key Differentiator: This is largely a philosophical and economic debate. Elsevier represents the traditional subscription-based publishing model adapting to open access, while true open access platforms are built on the principle of free, immediate access to scholarly research, often funded by authors or institutions rather than readers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Elsevier a reputable publisher?

Yes, Elsevier is widely considered one of the most reputable and largest academic publishers in the world, publishing a vast number of highly cited and peer-reviewed scientific, technical, and medical journals and books.

What is ScienceDirect?

ScienceDirect is Elsevier’s leading platform for full-text scientific, technical, and medical research.

It provides access to over 16 million articles from 2,500 journals and nearly 40,000 books.

Is Elsevier expensive for individuals?

Yes, accessing individual articles on Elsevier.com can be quite expensive, often ranging from $30-$50 per article, making institutional subscriptions the primary means of access.

Does Elsevier offer open access publishing?

Yes, Elsevier offers various open access options for authors, where the article is made freely available, typically upon payment of an Article Processing Charge APC by the author or their institution.

What are Article Processing Charges APCs on Elsevier?

APCs are fees paid by authors or their funders/institutions to publish their article open access in an Elsevier journal, making the research freely available to anyone. These fees can range from $1,500 to over $9,000. Southernrailway.com Reviews

What is Scopus?

Scopus is a comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature owned by Elsevier.

It indexes content from over 7,000 publishers and is widely used for bibliometric analysis and research evaluation.

How do I submit an article to an Elsevier journal?

To submit an article to an Elsevier journal, you typically use their online submission system often Editorial Manager found on the specific journal’s website.

You’ll need to prepare your manuscript according to the journal’s author guidelines.

Can I get a free trial for Elsevier products?

Yes, Elsevier often offers free trials for its various products like ScienceDirect, ClinicalKey, or analytics tools.

These trials typically last for a limited period e.g., 14 or 30 days.

How do I cancel an Elsevier free trial?

To cancel an Elsevier free trial, you usually need to log into the specific product’s account settings and locate the subscription management section to disable auto-renewal before the trial period ends. Always save the confirmation email.

What is ClinicalKey?

ClinicalKey is an Elsevier resource for healthcare professionals, providing evidence-based clinical answers, medical textbooks, journals, practice guidelines, and multimedia to aid in clinical decision-making.

Is Elsevier reliable for medical information?

Yes, Elsevier is highly reliable for medical information, as its content is extensively peer-reviewed and curated by experts, making platforms like ClinicalKey trusted resources for healthcare professionals.

What are some alternatives to Elsevier for research?

Alternatives include other major publishers like Springer Nature and Wiley, open access platforms like PubMed Central and PLOS, and academic search engines like Google Scholar. Medxobit.com Reviews

Does Elsevier offer career opportunities?

Yes, Elsevier has a dedicated “Careers at Elsevier” section on its website, highlighting various job openings in areas like technology, publishing, editorial, and sales, along with information on their workplace culture.

What is the role of AI in Elsevier’s products?

Elsevier is integrating AI into its products e.g., ScienceDirect AI, ClinicalKey AI to enhance research discovery, provide faster insights, and improve efficiency for users in navigating and analyzing vast amounts of data.

How do institutions subscribe to Elsevier content?

Institutions typically subscribe to Elsevier content through large, negotiated bundles known as “big deals” or specific journal/product licenses, with pricing tailored to their size and needs.

Does Elsevier offer perpetual access to subscribed content?

Many institutional contracts with Elsevier include terms for “perpetual access rights” to content published during the subscription period, meaning the institution retains access to that content even if the subscription is canceled.

Is Elsevier involved in open science initiatives?

Yes, Elsevier participates in open science initiatives, offering open access publishing options, supporting data sharing, and engaging in discussions around open research practices, though its core model remains subscription-based.

What are the main criticisms against Elsevier?

Main criticisms against Elsevier revolve around the high cost of institutional subscriptions, its dominant market position, and concerns about its approach to open access e.g., high APCs alongside subscription fees.

Can individual researchers buy access to Elsevier journals without an institutional subscription?

Yes, individual researchers can purchase access to single articles or sometimes individual journal subscriptions directly from Elsevier.com, though this is often quite expensive.

How does Elsevier ensure research integrity?

Elsevier ensures research integrity through rigorous peer-review processes, adherence to strict publication ethics guidelines, and the development and deployment of tools to detect plagiarism and research misconduct.

Stayinkintyre.com Reviews