Context driven testing

To optimize your testing strategy and achieve more impactful results, here’s a step-by-step guide on “Context-driven testing”:

👉 Skip the hassle and get the ready to use 100% working script (Link in the comments section of the YouTube Video) (Latest test 31/05/2025)

Check more on: How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile & Cloudflare WAF – Reddit, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, Cloudflare WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – Medium, How to Bypass Cloudflare Turnstile, WAF & reCAPTCHA v3 – LinkedIn Article

1. Understand the Core Purpose: Begin by recognizing that context-driven testing isn’t a rigid methodology, but a school of thought. It emphasizes that the value of any test artifact test plan, test case, bug report is entirely dependent on its context. Think of it as a flexible framework rather than a fixed checklist.
2. Identify Your Contextual Variables: Before even thinking about tests, define what truly matters for your project. This includes:
   • Project Goals: What is the software supposed to achieve? Why are we building it?
   • Stakeholder Needs: Who are the users? What are their priorities? What do they value?
   • Technical Constraints: What technologies are being used? What are the architectural limitations?
   • Business Risks: What are the biggest threats if this software fails? Financial, reputational, safety?
   • Time & Budget: How much time and resources do you realistically have for testing?
   • Team Skills: What are the strengths and weaknesses of your testing team?
   • Regulatory Requirements: Are there any compliance standards you must meet?
   • Product Maturity: Is this a brand-new feature or a mature, stable product?
   • Organizational Culture: Is your organization agile? Waterfall? What is the tolerance for risk?
3. Embrace Human Skill & Judgment: Unlike rigid, scripted approaches, context-driven testing relies heavily on the tester’s expertise, intuition, and critical thinking. It’s about skilled artisans, not merely execution machines. Encourage continuous learning and skill development within your testing team.
4. Prioritize Learning Over Scripting: Instead of writing exhaustive, step-by-step scripts for every possible scenario, focus on exploratory testing. This involves simultaneously learning about the product, designing tests, executing them, and analyzing results. Think of it as a dynamic conversation with the software.
5. Adapt & Iterate Constantly: The context changes – requirements shift, deadlines move, bugs are found, new features emerge. Your testing approach must adapt. Regularly review your strategy, re-evaluate risks, and adjust your testing activities accordingly. Rigidity is the enemy.
6. Communicate Effectively: The best testing provides valuable information to stakeholders. This means clear, concise, and timely communication about risks, quality, and progress. Your reports should be tailored to the audience, focusing on what they need to know to make informed decisions.
7. Leverage Tools Wisely, Don’t Be Ruled By Them: Tools are enablers, not dictators. Choose tools that support your context and goals, whether it’s for test management, automation, or performance testing. Don’t adopt a tool just because it’s popular. ensure it adds genuine value to your specific context. For example, instead of a complex, expensive test management suite that adds overhead, a simple spreadsheet or even a well-organized project management tool might be more effective for a smaller, agile team.
8. Understand the “Why”: Always ask “why?” Why are we testing this? Why are we using this approach? Why is this bug important? Understanding the underlying purpose drives more effective and efficient testing.

The Pillars of Context-Driven Testing: Navigating the Dynamics of Software Quality

Context-Driven Testing CDT isn’t a silver bullet or a one-size-fits-all methodology.

Rather, it’s a profound school of thought that champions human intellect and adaptability in the face of complex software development.

It posits that there is no “best practice” in testing, only good practices in context.

This philosophy emphasizes that every project, every product, and every team operates within a unique ecosystem, and the effectiveness of testing efforts is directly proportional to how well they align with that specific context. This isn’t just about finding bugs.

It’s about providing valuable information to stakeholders, enabling informed decisions about product quality and risk.

What Exactly is Context-Driven Testing? A Philosophical Foundation

At its core, Context-Driven Testing is an approach to software testing that values skilled human judgment and continuous learning over rigid, predefined processes. It rejects the notion that a single set of “best practices” can be universally applied to all testing scenarios. Instead, it argues that the most effective testing strategies are those that are tailored to the unique circumstances, goals, risks, and resources of a specific project. This means a testing approach for a life-critical medical device will look dramatically different from that for a new social media app.

The CDT school emphasizes:

• The value of human skill and experience: Expert testers, with their critical thinking and problem-solving abilities, are seen as indispensable. Automated tests are valuable, but they serve as tools for skilled testers, not replacements.
• Continuous learning and adaptation: Testers are expected to constantly learn about the product, the business, the technology, and even their own testing process. The testing strategy evolves as new information emerges.
• Information over documentation: While documentation has its place, the primary goal of testing is to provide actionable information about the product’s quality and risks, not simply to generate reams of paper.
• Risk-based prioritization: Testing efforts are focused on areas of highest risk, where potential failures would have the most severe consequences. This is a pragmatic approach to resource allocation.
• Collaboration and communication: Effective testing requires constant dialogue with developers, product owners, and other stakeholders to understand needs and convey findings.

This approach acknowledges the inherent complexity and unpredictability of software development. According to Capers Jones’s data on software defects, over 85% of defects found post-release are requirements or design flaws, not simply coding errors. CDT, by focusing on understanding the context and working collaboratively, aims to identify these deeper issues much earlier.

The Seven Basic Principles of the Context-Driven School

The Context-Driven School is guided by seven core principles, articulated by James Bach and Cem Kaner, which serve as a compass for effective and adaptable testing:

2. There are good practices, but no best practices: This principle directly challenges the idea of universal “best practices.” While certain techniques like exploratory testing, risk analysis, or test automation are generally good, their utility and application must always be evaluated within the specific project context. Blindly applying a “best practice” without considering its fit can lead to wasted effort and missed opportunities.
3. People are the most important part of any project’s context: The skills, experience, communication styles, and biases of the people involved—developers, testers, product owners, users—profoundly impact the project’s success. A highly skilled, collaborative team can achieve excellent results even with suboptimal processes, whereas a dysfunctional team will struggle regardless of the “best” tools or methodologies. This principle highlights the human element as paramount, emphasizing critical thinking and skilled judgment over rigid adherence to procedures.
4. The product is a complex phenomenon that can be known only through continuous reevaluation of observations: Software is not merely a set of features. it’s a dynamic system with emergent properties, often behaving in unexpected ways when components interact. Testers must constantly observe, question, and experiment to understand the product’s true behavior, performance, and vulnerabilities. This involves deep engagement, curiosity, and a willingness to challenge assumptions. It’s about learning the product, not just verifying it against a specification.
5. Good testing is a challenging intellectual process: Testing is not a rote, mechanical task. It demands creativity, critical thinking, problem-solving, and a deep understanding of human psychology, business logic, and technical systems. Testers are investigators, designers, and communicators, constantly striving to uncover information that matters. This principle elevates the role of the tester from a mere button-pusher to a skilled professional.
6. Only through the judgment and skill of the tester, in their context, can the right approach be chosen: This principle consolidates the previous ones, asserting that ultimately, it is the informed judgment of the skilled tester, considering all contextual factors, that determines the most effective testing strategy. No tool, methodology, or checklist can replace the insights of an experienced human mind. This empowers testers to take ownership of their craft and tailor their approach for maximum impact.

Risk-Based Testing: Prioritizing Efforts Where They Matter Most

How to Implement Risk-Based Testing: Specflow automated testing tutorial

1. Identify Potential Risks: This involves brainstorming with stakeholders product owners, developers, business analysts, even potential users to identify what could go wrong and what the impact would be.
   • Business Risks: Loss of revenue, damage to reputation, legal liabilities.
   • Technical Risks: System crashes, data corruption, security breaches, performance bottlenecks.
   • Project Risks: Schedule delays, budget overruns, resource unavailability.
   • Usability Risks: Difficult to use, poor user experience leading to abandonment.
2. Assess Likelihood and Impact: For each identified risk, evaluate:
   • Likelihood: How probable is it that this risk will manifest as a defect or failure? e.g., High, Medium, Low. or 1-5 scale.
   • Impact: If this risk does manifest, what will be the severity of its consequences? e.g., Catastrophic, Serious, Moderate, Minor. or 1-5 scale.
3. Calculate Risk Exposure: Multiply the likelihood by the impact to get a risk score. This helps in ranking risks.
   • Example: A security vulnerability High Likelihood, Critical Impact will have a much higher risk score than a minor UI glitch Low Likelihood, Minor Impact.
4. Prioritize Testing Activities: Allocate more testing time, effort, and skilled testers to the highest-scoring risks.
   • High-Risk Areas: These might warrant extensive exploratory testing, dedicated automation, security penetration testing, or performance load testing. Examples: critical business workflows e.g., financial transactions, patient data management, areas with frequent changes, complex integrations.
   • Medium-Risk Areas: May require a balanced approach of scripted and exploratory tests.
   • Low-Risk Areas: Might only receive minimal sanity checks or be covered by automated regression tests.
5. Communicate and Re-evaluate: Share the risk assessment with the team and stakeholders. Crucially, risks are not static. As the project progresses, new risks may emerge, and existing ones may change in likelihood or impact. Regularly review and update your risk assessment, perhaps at the beginning of each sprint in an Agile context.

Data Insight: A study by the Project Management Institute PMI indicated that organizations effectively managing project risks have a 30% higher success rate for their projects compared to those that do not. In testing, this translates directly to delivering higher quality software efficiently by focusing on what truly matters.

Exploratory Testing: The Heartbeat of Context-Driven Discovery

While some testing involves structured, documented steps, exploratory testing is where the context-driven tester truly shines. It’s a style of testing where the tester is simultaneously learning about the product, designing tests, executing them, and interpreting results. Think of it as a structured, disciplined investigation rather than haphazard poking around. This approach directly embodies the CDT principle of “continuous reevaluation of observations.”

Key Characteristics of Exploratory Testing:

• Simultaneous Learning, Design, and Execution: Unlike scripted testing where design precedes execution, in exploratory testing, these activities happen in parallel. This allows testers to adapt their approach based on what they discover.
• Active Engagement and Observation: Testers are deeply engaged with the software, constantly asking “What if?” and observing its behavior. They’re looking for inconsistencies, unexpected outcomes, and areas of potential weakness.
• Heuristics and Oracles: Exploratory testers use a mental toolkit of heuristics rules of thumb, common failure patterns and oracles sources of truth, like specifications, similar products, common sense to guide their testing and determine if the software is behaving correctly. For example, a common heuristic is “test for CRUD operations” Create, Read, Update, Delete on any data entry. An oracle might be a mathematical calculation that the software should perform accurately.
• Time-boxed Sessions: Often, exploratory testing is conducted in time-boxed sessions e.g., 60-90 minutes focusing on a specific area or mission. This provides structure and prevents aimless wandering.
• Documentation is Lean: While not entirely absent, documentation is usually light, focusing on session notes, bug reports, and perhaps high-level test charters missions for the session. The emphasis is on information delivery, not voluminous test case creation.
• Skilled Testers are Paramount: Effective exploratory testing requires highly skilled, curious, and creative testers who can think critically, understand the domain, and communicate their findings articulately. It’s not for beginners.

Benefits of Exploratory Testing in a CDT Context:

• Finds More Bugs: Especially elusive, high-impact bugs that might be missed by rigid scripts, as testers can follow their intuition and unexpected paths. Research by Microsoft indicated that exploratory testing found 20-30% more critical bugs than scripted testing alone in certain projects.
• Adapts to Change: Highly flexible, allowing testers to quickly shift focus as requirements or understanding of the product evolve.
• Builds Product Knowledge: Deepens the tester’s understanding of the software’s behavior, architecture, and user workflows.
• Generates New Ideas: Often leads to insights for new features, usability improvements, or test automation opportunities.
• Cost-Effective for Complex Systems: Reduces the upfront effort of creating detailed scripts for systems that are poorly understood or constantly changing.

Test Automation in a Context-Driven World: A Strategic Partner, Not a Master

In the context-driven paradigm, test automation is viewed as a powerful tool to amplify the tester’s efforts, not a replacement for human intellect. It’s about strategic automation that serves the project’s specific needs, rather than chasing a mythical 100% automation coverage. The focus is on automating tedious, repetitive, or computationally intensive checks to free up skilled testers for more valuable exploratory work.

Strategic Automation Principles:

• Automate the Right Things: Don’t automate everything. Prioritize:
  • Regression Tests: Critical functionalities that must always work after changes. This is where automation shines, providing rapid feedback.
  • Performance Baselines: Repeated checks to ensure response times and throughput don’t degrade.
  • Data Setup/Teardown: Automating the creation and cleanup of test data.
  • Repetitive Checks: Any test that needs to be run many times with minor variations.
  • Unit and API Tests: These are foundational and provide fast feedback to developers.
• Maintainability and Reliability: Automated tests must be reliable and easy to maintain. Flaky tests tests that pass sometimes and fail others without a clear reason are worse than no tests, as they erode trust in the automation suite. Aim for a high pass rate, ideally above 95% in a stable system.
• Fast Feedback Loop: Automated tests should run quickly to provide rapid feedback to the development team. If a full regression suite takes hours, its value as a rapid feedback mechanism diminishes.
• Don’t Automate Exploratory Work: The creative, insightful, and investigative nature of exploratory testing cannot be automated. Automation handles the checks, while humans perform the testing.
• Complementary, Not Replacement: Automation and manual exploratory testing are complementary. Automation provides breadth covering many paths quickly, while exploratory testing provides depth finding unexpected issues and exploring edge cases.
• Living Documentation: Well-designed automated tests can serve as a form of living documentation, clearly illustrating how certain features are expected to behave.

Data Point: A report by Capgemini found that organizations with higher levels of test automation reported an average of 15% faster time-to-market for their software products, highlighting the efficiency gains when implemented strategically. However, they also noted that ineffective automation e.g., poor design, high maintenance can actually increase project costs and delays.

Adapting to Agile and DevOps: Flexibility in Fast-Paced Environments

How CDT Thrives in Agile/DevOps:

• Early and Continuous Testing “Shift Left”: CDT encourages testing to begin as early as possible in the development lifecycle, even during requirements gathering and design. This aligns perfectly with Agile’s emphasis on “build quality in” and DevOps’ “shift left” philosophy. Testers collaborate with developers and product owners from day one.
• Rapid Feedback Loops: The focus on exploratory testing and strategic automation provides quick, actionable feedback to the team. This allows developers to fix issues promptly, reducing the cost of defect resolution.
• Cross-Functional Teams: In Agile, testers are integral members of cross-functional teams, working closely with developers and product owners. This fosters better communication and shared understanding, reducing silos.
• Just-in-Time Documentation: Instead of extensive upfront documentation, CDT promotes creating documentation as needed, focusing on high-value information. This fits Agile’s preference for working software over comprehensive documentation.
• Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery CI/CD: Automated tests are integrated into the CI/CD pipeline, providing immediate feedback on code changes. This ensures that new features or bug fixes don’t break existing functionality.
• Focus on Value Delivery: Both Agile and CDT prioritize delivering value to the customer. Testing efforts are aligned with features that provide the most immediate business value.
• Whole Team Approach to Quality: In a DevOps culture, quality is everyone’s responsibility. Testers act as quality coaches and enablers, sharing their knowledge and helping the entire team build quality into the product.

Challenges and How CDT Addresses Them:

• Limited Time for Traditional Testing: With short sprints, there’s often not enough time for lengthy, formal test cycles. CDT leverages efficient techniques like exploratory testing and targeted automation to deliver maximum information within tight deadlines.
• “Definition of Done”: CDT helps define what “done” means from a quality perspective, ensuring that features are not only coded but also adequately tested before release.

Metrics and Reporting: Informing, Not Just Counting

In Context-Driven Testing, metrics and reporting are about providing valuable information for decision-making, rather than simply tracking arbitrary numbers. The goal is to paint a clear picture of the product’s quality, the risks involved, and the effectiveness of the testing efforts, tailored to the specific audience. Blindly reporting “test case pass rates” without context can be misleading and unhelpful. How to debug html

Key Principles for CDT Metrics and Reporting:

1. Contextual Relevance: Metrics must be meaningful within the project’s context. For a safety-critical system, defect density in core functionalities might be paramount. For a rapidly iterating startup, time-to-discovery for critical bugs might be more valuable.
2. Focus on Information, Not Just Data: Don’t just present raw data. interpret it. What does a particular trend or number mean for the product’s quality or risk?
3. Audience-Specific Reporting: Tailor your reports to the audience.
   • Developers: Need technical details, reproducible steps, stack traces.
   • Product Owners: Need to understand impact on user experience, business value, prioritization.
   • Executives: Need high-level summaries, risk assessment, impact on market, budget, and timeline.
4. Beyond Pass/Fail Counts: While pass/fail numbers have a place, go deeper.
   • Defect Density in Critical Areas: How many bugs are found per feature or per module, especially in high-risk areas?
   • Defect Age and Cycle Time: How long do bugs stay open? How quickly are they fixed?
   • Test Coverage Risk-Based: What percentage of critical risks have been addressed by testing? Rather than arbitrary code coverage.
   • Test Effectiveness: Are we finding important bugs? Are we preventing regressions?
   • Test Stability: How often do automated tests fail due to environmental issues versus actual product defects?
   • Exploratory Session Outcomes: What new information was discovered? What new risks were identified? What areas need more attention?
5. Emphasize Risk Status: Clearly communicate the current state of known risks. Are they mitigated, ongoing, or new? What are the potential consequences?
6. Qualitative Insights: Don’t neglect qualitative observations. A well-written summary of a difficult-to-use feature, or an unexpected system behavior, can be far more informative than a dozen quantitative metrics.
7. Dashboards and Visualizations: Use clear, concise dashboards and visualizations to present information effectively. Trends, heatmaps, and burn-down charts can convey a lot of information quickly.

Example Report Elements for a CDT Context:

• Current Risk Summary: A concise overview of the top 3-5 critical risks, their current status, and potential impact.
• Key Quality Indicators: A few chosen metrics e.g., critical bug count, mean time to resolve critical bugs, percentage of high-risk features tested.
• Testing Coverage by risk/feature: A visual representation of which critical areas have been tested and to what extent.
• Qualitative Observations: A brief narrative highlighting key findings from recent exploratory sessions, usability concerns, or performance observations.
• Recommendations: Clear, actionable suggestions for improving quality, mitigating risks, or refining the testing approach.

By focusing on information and context, CDT metrics move beyond mere data collection to become powerful tools for guiding the project towards successful outcomes.

The Role of a Skilled Context-Driven Tester: Beyond the Script

In the context-driven paradigm, the tester is not merely an executor of pre-defined steps. they are a highly skilled professional, an investigative journalist, a critical thinker, and a strategic advisor on quality and risk. This role demands much more than just technical proficiency. it requires a unique blend of intellectual curiosity, adaptability, and communication skills.

Core Attributes and Responsibilities of a Skilled CDT Tester:

1. Deep Understanding of the Product and Domain: A CDT tester strives to understand not just what the software does, but why it does it, its business purpose, its user base, and its underlying technology. This means engaging with product owners, developers, and even end-users.
2. Critical Thinking and Problem Solving: They continuously ask “what if?”, “how can this break?”, “what’s missing?”, and “what else could be true?”. They’re not just confirming functionality. they’re actively searching for problems and inconsistencies. This involves inferring potential issues even when not explicitly defined.
3. Heuristic and Oracle Application: They leverage a vast mental library of testing heuristics rules of thumb for finding common defects and oracles sources of truth to judge correctness to guide their exploratory sessions and identify anomalies.
4. Information Gathering and Analysis: They are constantly gathering information from various sources – specifications, code, conversations, previous bug reports, competitor products, and especially from interacting with the software itself. They then analyze this information to identify risks and formulate new testing ideas.
5. Risk Assessment and Prioritization: They actively participate in identifying, assessing, and prioritizing project and product risks, focusing their testing efforts on the areas of highest concern.
6. Effective Communication and Reporting: They are adept at communicating complex technical information to diverse audiences developers, product owners, management in a clear, concise, and actionable manner. They tailor their reports to provide the specific information each stakeholder needs to make informed decisions.
7. Technical Aptitude: While not necessarily coders, CDT testers often possess strong technical understanding. They can read logs, use developer tools, understand APIs, and potentially write scripts for test automation or data manipulation. This allows them to “see” more deeply into the software.
8. Curiosity and Skepticism: They possess an insatiable curiosity about how things work and don’t work and a healthy skepticism towards assumptions and claims. They question the obvious.

This profound emphasis on human skill aligns with the principles of intellectual effort and mastery encouraged in Islam. Instead of rote obedience to a checklist, it champions the development of expertise and responsible judgment in one’s craft. The skilled context-driven tester doesn’t just “do testing”. they are the testing, guiding the quality efforts with their expertise and wisdom.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Context-Driven Testing CDT?

Context-Driven Testing CDT is a school of thought in software testing that emphasizes that the value and applicability of any testing practice or method depend entirely on its specific context.

It argues that there are no universal “best practices,” only good practices that are effective within a given set of circumstances, such as project goals, team skills, time constraints, and technical risks.

How is Context-Driven Testing different from traditional scripted testing?

Context-Driven Testing differs significantly from traditional scripted testing by prioritizing human skill, adaptability, and continuous learning over rigid, pre-defined test scripts.

What are the main principles of Context-Driven Testing?

The main principles of Context-Driven Testing include: the value of any practice depends on its context. there are good practices, but no best practices. Introducing percy visual engine

People are the most important part of any project’s context.

Projects evolve over time, good testing is a continuous reevaluation of risks.

The product is a complex phenomenon that can be known only through continuous reevaluation of observations. good testing is a challenging intellectual process.

And only through the judgment and skill of the tester, in their context, can the right approach be chosen.

Is Context-Driven Testing suitable for all types of projects?

Yes, Context-Driven Testing is theoretically suitable for all types of projects because its core tenet is adaptability to any context. However, it particularly shines in projects with high complexity, rapidly changing requirements, or where deep system understanding and critical thinking are paramount, such as exploratory product development or projects with significant unknown risks. For very simple, repetitive tasks, a more automated or template-driven approach might seem more efficient, though CDT would still guide what to automate and how to approach even those simple tasks effectively.

What is the role of risk in Context-Driven Testing?

Risk plays a central and fundamental role in Context-Driven Testing.

CDT uses risk assessment as a primary driver for prioritizing testing efforts.

Testers continuously identify, evaluate, and re-evaluate potential risks e.g., technical failures, business impact, security vulnerabilities to focus their limited time and resources on testing the areas where failures would have the most significant negative consequences.

Does Context-Driven Testing use automation?

Yes, Context-Driven Testing does use automation, but strategically. Automation is viewed as a valuable tool to amplify the tester’s efforts by handling repetitive checks and providing rapid feedback e.g., regression tests, performance tests. However, CDT emphasizes that automation should be a servant to human skill and judgment, not a replacement for the intellectual process of testing itself. The focus is on automating the right things for the specific context.

What is exploratory testing and how does it relate to CDT?

Exploratory testing is a key technique within Context-Driven Testing. Cypress touch and mouse events

It is a testing style where the tester is simultaneously learning about the product, designing tests, executing them, and interpreting the results.

It’s an unscripted, highly interactive, and heuristic-driven approach that allows skilled testers to uncover unexpected issues and gain a deeper understanding of the software’s behavior, aligning perfectly with CDT’s emphasis on continuous learning and adaptation.

What skills are important for a Context-Driven Tester?

Important skills for a Context-Driven Tester include critical thinking, problem-solving, strong communication, adaptability, a deep understanding of the product and domain, technical aptitude, curiosity, and a continuous learning mindset.

They must be able to ask insightful questions, analyze information, assess risks, and effectively convey their findings.

How does Context-Driven Testing handle documentation?

Context-Driven Testing handles documentation pragmatically.

It acknowledges that documentation has its place but prioritizes providing valuable information for decision-making over generating voluminous, potentially quickly outdated documents.

Documentation is often lean, focusing on high-level test charters for exploratory sessions, clear bug reports, and context-specific reports that convey risks and quality status rather than exhaustive, step-by-step test cases for every scenario.

What kind of metrics are relevant in Context-Driven Testing?

Relevant metrics in Context-Driven Testing are those that provide actionable information for decision-making and are contextual to the project.

This goes beyond simple pass/fail counts to include metrics like defect density in critical areas, mean time to resolve critical bugs, test coverage based on risk, the effectiveness of testing in finding important issues, and qualitative insights from exploratory sessions.

The goal is to inform stakeholders about risks and product quality. Visual regression testing with puppeteer

Can Context-Driven Testing be used in Agile environments?

Yes, Context-Driven Testing is highly suitable for Agile environments.

Its emphasis on flexibility, rapid feedback, continuous learning, risk-based prioritization, and early, continuous testing aligns perfectly with Agile principles.

CDT enables testers to adapt quickly to changing requirements, provide timely information to cross-functional teams, and contribute effectively within short sprints and continuous delivery pipelines.

Does CDT replace test plans?

No, CDT does not necessarily replace test plans, but it redefines their nature. In CDT, a test plan is often a dynamic, high-level strategy document that outlines the approach to testing, the risks, the goals, and the resources, rather than a rigid list of every single test case. It’s a living document that evolves with the project’s context, serving as a guide rather than a strict mandate.

Is Context-Driven Testing the same as Black Box Testing?

No, Context-Driven Testing is not the same as Black Box Testing. Black Box Testing is a technique where the tester does not have knowledge of the internal structure or implementation of the system. Context-Driven Testing, on the other hand, is a school of thought or philosophy that can employ various techniques, including Black Box, White Box, and Grey Box testing, depending on the specific context and information needed. A CDT tester uses whatever information is available and relevant.

How does CDT address test coverage?

CDT addresses test coverage not through arbitrary metrics like “100% test case execution” or “code coverage,” but by focusing on risk-based coverage. It asks: “Have we adequately tested the areas of highest risk?” and “Have we explored the critical paths and functions sufficiently?” Coverage in CDT is about ensuring that the most important aspects of the product, particularly those with high impact if they fail, have received appropriate testing attention given the context.

What are test oracles in CDT?

Test oracles in Context-Driven Testing are sources of truth or mechanisms by which a tester determines if a system under test is behaving correctly.

Since there might not always be a detailed specification, CDT testers use various oracles, such as consistency with history previous versions, consistency with the product’s purpose, consistency with similar products, common sense, consistency with user expectations, and comparison to existing data or calculations.

Is CDT only for manual testing?

No, CDT is not only for manual testing.

While it places a high value on human skill and exploratory testing which is largely manual, it strategically incorporates test automation. Empower qa developers work together

Automation is used to perform repetitive checks, regression testing, and other tasks that free up human testers for more intellectual, investigative, and context-dependent testing activities.

Automation serves the human tester in a CDT approach.

What are the challenges of implementing Context-Driven Testing?

Challenges in implementing Context-Driven Testing include: requiring highly skilled and experienced testers.

Potential difficulty in convincing stakeholders who prefer rigid metrics and exhaustive documentation.

Managing the inherent flexibility without appearing disorganized.

And ensuring clear communication in a dynamic environment.

It requires a shift in mindset from process adherence to intelligent judgment.

How can I start applying CDT principles in my project?

To start applying CDT principles, begin by thoroughly understanding your project’s context: its goals, risks, stakeholders, and resources.

Embrace exploratory testing and encourage your team to learn and adapt continuously.

Prioritize testing efforts based on risk, and focus on providing valuable information to stakeholders. Automate failure detection in qa workflow

Also, empower your testers to use their judgment and skills, and leverage automation strategically.

Does CDT ignore formal test artifacts like test plans and reports?

No, CDT does not ignore formal test artifacts, but it redefines their purpose and content.

Instead of being rigid, comprehensive documents, they become flexible, adaptive tools that support the testing effort.

Test plans become strategic guides, and reports focus on conveying actionable information about risks and quality, tailored to the audience, rather than just tracking numbers. The emphasis is on usefulness in context.

What is the relationship between CDT and the ‘Mindset of a Tester’?

The relationship between CDT and the ‘Mindset of a Tester’ is symbiotic.

CDT inherently shapes and is shaped by a particular mindset: one of curiosity, critical thinking, skepticism, continuous learning, and adaptability.

It encourages testers to be inquisitive problem-solvers who question assumptions, explore deeply, and provide insightful information, rather than merely following instructions.

This mindset is crucial for effective Context-Driven Testing.

Alerts and popups in puppeteer