Benchmarkengineers.com Review

Based on looking at the website, Benchmarkengineers.com presents itself as a professional civil engineering firm operating in Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska.

Overall Review Summary:

• Transparency: Lacks clear information about key personnel beyond the president, Scott D. Larson, and the founder, Jack Noblitt. There’s no easily accessible team page with biographies or professional credentials for other engineers or surveyors, which is crucial for a service-based professional firm.
• Client Testimonials/Reviews: No dedicated section for client testimonials or external reviews, making it difficult to gauge client satisfaction and verify claims of excellence.
• Project Details & Portfolio: While “Recent Civil Engineering Projects” are listed, the “More Info” links lead to generic “designing the future” pages or external sites like plancheyenne.org, rather than detailed case studies with specific project outcomes, client names with permission, or challenges overcome. This lack of detailed portfolio content raises questions about the scope and success of their claimed 46 years of experience.
• Licensing Verification: Although they state registration in Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska, direct links or clear registration numbers to verify these licenses on official state boards are absent. This is a significant oversight for a professional engineering firm.
• Privacy Policy & Terms of Service: There are no visible links to a Privacy Policy or Terms of Service. This is a major red flag for data protection and user understanding of how their information might be handled.
• Security Measures: While not explicitly stated, the lack of crucial policy pages suggests potential gaps in security awareness, although this cannot be confirmed without deeper technical analysis.
• Online Presence & Engagement: No discernible social media links or active blog, which limits their online professional engagement and transparency.

Given these critical omissions, Benchmarkengineers.com cannot be fully recommended without significant improvements in transparency, verifiable credentials, and comprehensive policy disclosures.

For a professional engineering firm, these are not just minor details but fundamental elements that build trust and credibility.

Here are some ethical and professional alternatives for engineering and construction services, focusing on firms with strong reputations and transparent online presences:

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Benchmarkengineers.com Review Latest Discussions & Reviews:

• AECOM: A global infrastructure consulting firm known for its extensive portfolio in transportation, water, buildings, and environmental projects. They are transparent about their leadership, project experience, and sustainability commitments.
  • Key Features: Global presence, diverse expertise, sustainability focus, robust project portfolio.
  • Price: Project-based, varies significantly by scope.
  • Pros: Highly experienced, wide range of services, strong ethical framework.
  • Cons: Can be large for smaller projects, may have higher overhead costs.
• Jacobs: Another leading global professional services firm, offering solutions in engineering, architecture, construction, operations, and maintenance. They emphasize social responsibility and ethical practices.
  • Key Features: Global reach, focus on innovation, strong commitment to social good, comprehensive service offerings.
  • Price: Project-based, varies by complexity.
  • Pros: Innovative solutions, strong safety record, diverse talent pool.
  • Cons: Similar to AECOM, can be less agile for very small projects.
• HDR: An employee-owned firm specializing in engineering, architecture, environmental, and construction services. They are known for their commitment to client satisfaction and community engagement.
  • Key Features: Employee-owned, focus on sustainable design, strong community involvement, specialized expertise in various sectors.
  • Price: Project-specific, varies by scope.
  • Pros: Dedicated staff, excellent client relationships, strong ethical guidelines.
  • Cons: Might have a more regional focus compared to global giants, though still very large.
• Stantec: A global design and consulting firm in infrastructure and communities. They prioritize community well-being and ethical project delivery.
  • Key Features: Sustainable design, community-focused projects, strong emphasis on local presence and impact.
  • Price: Varies by project and service.
  • Pros: Integrated services, commitment to sustainability, strong client relationships.
  • Cons: Broad service range might mean less niche specialization in certain areas.
• Gensler: While primarily an architecture firm, Gensler often collaborates with engineering firms or has in-house engineering capabilities for large-scale projects. They are known for innovative and sustainable design.
  • Key Features: Global design leader, innovation in sustainable architecture, broad project experience.
  • Price: Project-dependent.
  • Pros: Highly creative, strong focus on design excellence, reputable.
  • Cons: More design-centric. engineering services might be part of a larger design package.
• Black & Veatch: Specializing in critical infrastructure, including energy, water, telecommunications, and government services. They have a long history of ethical operations and complex project delivery.
  • Key Features: Focus on critical infrastructure, global footprint, long-standing reputation, strong technical expertise.
  • Price: Project-based.
  • Pros: Expertise in essential services, reliable project execution, strong safety culture.
  • Cons: Highly specialized, might not be suitable for general civil engineering needs.
• WSP Global: A global engineering and professional services firm that provides services to transform the built environment and restore the natural environment. They have a strong commitment to ethical conduct and sustainable development.
  • Key Features: Global presence, broad range of engineering disciplines, focus on sustainable development, strong innovation drive.
  • Pros: Comprehensive services, strong ethical commitments, highly skilled professionals.
  • Cons: Large scale might lead to less personalized service for smaller clients.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Benchmarkengineers.com Review & First Look: A Critical Assessment

When you first land on Benchmarkengineers.com, you’re greeted with a straightforward layout that highlights their core principles: “Honesty, Ethics & Integrity.” This immediate emphasis on values is a strong starting point, especially for a firm operating in civil engineering, where trust and reliability are paramount.

The site prominently displays contact numbers for their Cheyenne and Fort Collins offices, signaling accessibility.

It also quickly establishes their presence across Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska, and mentions their founding in 1979, indicating a long operational history.

However, a “first look” is just that—a glance.

Digging deeper, you start to notice areas where the site’s presentation of these crucial values could be substantiated with more actionable information. Beast.agency Review

While the declaration of ethics is admirable, the absence of detailed mechanisms for upholding these ethics, or transparent reporting on past project challenges and resolutions, leaves a gap.

For instance, a firm truly committed to ethics might include case studies demonstrating how they navigated ethical dilemmas, or even a public code of conduct beyond simple statements.

• Initial Impressions:
  • Positive: Clear mission statement Honesty, Ethics & Integrity, direct contact information, immediate declaration of service areas and longevity.
  • Concerning: High-level statements without granular details, lack of visible trust-building elements like detailed team profiles or client testimonials.

The website’s structure is clean, with easy navigation to “About Us” and “Contact Us” pages.

The “Services” section is well-organized, listing various civil engineering disciplines such as Commercial, Educational, and Residential Developments, Hydrological Design, Roadway Infrastructure, Surveying, Utility Infrastructure, and Planning and Feasibility.

Each service has a “More Info” link, which ideally should lead to detailed explanations of their expertise and past projects within that specific area. Modernfuel.com Review

Unfortunately, as noted in the summary, these links often redirect to generic or external pages, which detracts from the perceived depth of their expertise.

For a firm emphasizing 46 years of experience, a robust, detailed portfolio showcasing diverse projects with tangible results would significantly bolster their claims.

Benchmarkengineers.com Pros & Cons: An Imbalanced Scale

When evaluating Benchmarkengineers.com, it’s important to weigh what the website does well against what it lacks. While the site clearly attempts to project an image of professionalism and integrity, the current presentation leaves more to be desired.

Pros: What the Website Does Well

• Clear Statement of Values: The repeated emphasis on “Honesty, Ethics & Integrity” is a strong foundational message. This directly aligns with the ethical considerations often sought by clients, particularly in public works or large-scale private developments where trust is paramount.

  • Scott D. Larson’s Leadership: The site introduces Scott D. Larson as the President and owner, stating his personal and professional life is based on these core concepts. This provides a direct point of contact for the firm’s leadership and values.
  • Historical Context: Acknowledging Jack Noblitt, the founder in 1979, and the transition to Scott Larson in 1996, adds a sense of legacy and continuity. This historical depth can be reassuring to potential clients.

• Defined Service Areas: The website clearly lists their operational regions: Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska. This specificity helps potential clients quickly determine if the firm serves their geographical needs. Aberdeenwebsitedesign.net Review

• Comprehensive Service List: The “BME Civil Engineering Services” section details a broad range of civil engineering expertise, including:

  • Commercial Developments
  • Educational Facilities
  • Residential Developments
  • Hydrological Design
  • Roadway Infrastructure
  • Surveying Projects
  • Utility Infrastructure
  • Planning and Feasibility

  This list gives a good overview of their capabilities, catering to diverse client needs.

• Contact Accessibility: Multiple phone numbers for both Cheyenne and Fort Collins offices are prominently displayed, along with physical addresses. This ease of contact is a basic but essential element of any professional website.

• Community Involvement: The mention of their strong working relationship with Habitat for Humanity of Laramie County since 2005 demonstrates a commitment to community service, which can enhance their public image and appeal.

Cons: Significant Areas for Improvement

• Lack of Verifiable Team Information: Beyond Scott D. Larson, there is no information about the “outstanding group of engineers, designers, and surveyors” with “more than 130 years of highly skilled, professional experience.”
  • Missing Biographies: There are no staff profiles, credentials, or specific expertise listed for the team members. This lack of transparency makes it impossible for potential clients to vet the qualifications of the individuals who would be working on their projects. In a professional service industry like engineering, the human capital is paramount.
  • Impact: This absence undermines the claim of collective experience and expertise, reducing trust.
• Insufficient Project Portfolio Details: While “Recent Civil Engineering Projects” are mentioned, the “More Info” links are severely lacking.
  • Generic Links: Clicking “More Info” for projects like “Walterscheid Reconstruction Plan” or “Coyote Ridge Elementary School” leads to generic informational pages e.g., “designing the future” or external government/educational sites e.g., plancheyenne.org, lccc.wy.edu rather than specific project case studies.
  • No Outcomes or Challenges: There are no details on the scope of work, challenges faced, solutions implemented, client testimonials, or measurable outcomes e.g., cost savings, efficiency gains, environmental benefits. This prevents potential clients from understanding the firm’s actual capabilities and successful project deliveries.
  • Impact: Without concrete examples, the claim of 46 years of experience and high-quality work becomes unsubstantiated.
• Absence of Client Testimonials or Reviews: There is no dedicated section for client feedback, testimonials, or external review integration e.g., Google Reviews, industry-specific platforms.
• Missing Legal & Policy Documentation: Crucially, the website lacks readily accessible links to fundamental legal and policy documents.
  • No Privacy Policy: This is a major red flag. In the absence of a privacy policy, users have no idea how their personal data e.g., collected via contact forms, if any is handled, stored, or shared. This is a basic requirement for any legitimate website, especially under regulations like GDPR or CCPA.
  • No Terms of Service/Use: Without terms of service, there’s no clear agreement between the user and the website regarding responsibilities, disclaimers, or intellectual property.
  • Impact: This omission signals a lack of professionalism and potentially raises legal compliance concerns.
• Unverifiable Licensing Information: While the site states they are “registered to practice engineering in the State of Wyoming through the business and individual licenses granted by the Wyoming Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Professional Land Surveyors” and “licensed to practice engineering in Colorado and Nebraska,” direct links to these regulatory boards or specific license numbers are missing.
  • Impact: For a professional firm, verifiable licensing is non-negotiable. Easy access to this information builds trust and allows potential clients to confirm their credentials independently.
• Limited Online Engagement: The website appears to be a static brochure with no dynamic content.
  • No Blog/News Section: There is no blog, news section, or updates on industry insights, recent projects, or firm activities beyond the “Recent Projects” section which is poorly detailed.
  • No Social Media Links: There are no visible links to professional social media platforms e.g., LinkedIn, X/Twitter, industry-specific forums where the firm might engage with its community, share expertise, or showcase its culture.
  • Impact: This lack of dynamic engagement suggests a firm that might be less digitally savvy or less committed to contemporary forms of professional interaction and transparency.
• General Website Modernization: While functional, the website’s design feels somewhat dated compared to leading professional service firms.
  • Impact: A modern, responsive design with clear calls to action and engaging visuals can enhance user experience and reinforce professionalism.

In conclusion, while Benchmarkengineers.com articulates strong values, its execution in demonstrating these values through robust online transparency, verifiable information, and comprehensive legal disclosures is significantly lacking. Quicknitro.com Review

This imbalance creates a perception of an underdeveloped online presence for a firm claiming decades of experience and ethical leadership.

How to Cancel Benchmarkengineers.com Subscription / Free Trial: Not Applicable

The concept of “cancelling a subscription” or a “free trial” is not applicable to Benchmarkengineers.com.

This website serves as the online presence for a civil engineering firm that provides project-based professional services, not a subscription-based product or a software service with a trial period.

• Service-Based Model: Benchmark Engineers, P.C. operates on a project-by-project basis. Clients engage them for specific civil engineering needs—be it commercial development, hydrological design, or surveying projects.
• Engagement Process: Typically, the engagement with such a firm involves:
  1. Initial Inquiry: A client reaches out via phone or the contact form for a consultation.
  2. Proposal Development: The firm assesses the project needs and provides a detailed proposal outlining the scope of work, timelines, and fees.
  3. Contract Agreement: If the proposal is accepted, a formal contract is signed, detailing the terms of engagement, payment schedules, and deliverables.
  4. Project Execution: The firm then undertakes the engineering work as per the contract.
• Termination of Services: If a client wishes to “cancel” or terminate services mid-project, it would fall under the terms of the signed contract. This would involve a formal process, potentially including:
  • Notice period requirements.
  • Payment for work completed up to the termination date.
  • Handover of project documents and intellectual property.
  • Resolution of any outstanding obligations.

Therefore, there is no “cancel button” or online portal for ending a service agreement with Benchmarkengineers.com, as it functions as a traditional professional service provider.

Any disengagement would be a contractual matter, handled directly with the firm’s management. Ordoab.com Review

Benchmarkengineers.com Pricing: Project-Specific & Inquiry-Based

Similar to the “subscription” concept, Benchmarkengineers.com does not display standardized pricing or a price list on its website.

This is entirely typical and expected for a professional civil engineering firm.

The pricing for civil engineering services is inherently complex and highly variable, determined by a multitude of factors specific to each project.

• Customized Proposals: Pricing for services like civil engineering is always provided through customized proposals after an initial consultation and assessment of the client’s needs. Factors influencing the cost include:
  • Project Scope and Complexity: Is it a small residential subdivision or a large-scale commercial development? Does it involve intricate hydrological modeling or straightforward surveying?
  • Required Expertise: Does the project demand specialized engineering knowledge or a multi-disciplinary team?
  • Project Duration: How long will the project take to complete? Engineering firms often bill on an hourly rate for staff, or a fixed fee for specific deliverables.
  • Deliverables: What specific plans, reports, analyses, or certifications are required?
  • Regulatory Environment: Different jurisdictions have varying permitting processes and regulatory requirements, which can impact the scope of work and associated costs.
  • Site Conditions: The unique characteristics of the project site e.g., topography, soil conditions, environmental considerations can significantly influence the engineering effort.
• Request for Proposal RFP Process: For larger or public projects, clients typically issue an RFP, to which firms like Benchmark Engineers would respond with a detailed technical and financial proposal.
• Hourly Rates vs. Fixed Fees: Engineering firms commonly structure their fees in two primary ways:
  • Hourly Rates: Billing based on the actual hours spent by engineers, designers, and support staff, often with different rates for different levels of expertise.
  • Fixed Fees: A pre-determined total cost for a defined scope of work, often used for projects with well-understood parameters. Sometimes, a hybrid approach with a fixed fee for certain phases and hourly for others is used.

To obtain pricing from Benchmarkengineers.com, a prospective client would need to initiate contact through their provided phone numbers or contact form and discuss their specific project requirements.

The firm would then prepare a tailored proposal based on that discussion. Accelerateuk.com Review

This bespoke approach is standard for professional engineering services and reflects the unique nature of each project they undertake.

Benchmarkengineers.com vs. Industry Standards for Professional Engineering Firms

When evaluating Benchmarkengineers.com, it’s not enough to look at it in isolation.

A true assessment involves comparing its online presence and stated practices against the industry standards for professional civil engineering firms, particularly those with decades of experience and a strong ethical stance. Here’s how Benchmarkengineers.com measures up:

Areas Where Benchmarkengineers.com Meets Basic Industry Standards:

• Basic Online Presence: They have a functional website, which is a fundamental requirement for any modern business.
• Core Contact Information: Phone numbers and physical addresses are clearly visible.
• Service Listing: A comprehensive list of services is provided, informing potential clients of their capabilities.
• Statement of Values: Explicitly stating “Honesty, Ethics & Integrity” aligns with the professional codes of conduct expected in engineering. Many firms will highlight their commitment to ethical practice.

Areas Where Benchmarkengineers.com Falls Short of Industry Best Practices:

• Transparency and Team Profiles:
  • Industry Standard: Leading engineering firms often feature detailed “Our Team” or “Leadership” pages with professional biographies, credentials P.E. licenses, certifications, areas of specialization, and even photos of key personnel. This builds trust and allows clients to see the expertise behind the firm. Many firms publish their organizational charts or department heads.
  • Benchmarkengineers.com: Only Scott D. Larson, the President, is prominently named. The claim of “more than 130 years of highly skilled, professional experience” for the team is made without any individual profiles to substantiate it. This is a significant deviation from industry norms for transparency.
• Project Portfolio Depth and Verifiability:
  • Industry Standard: Reputable firms showcase detailed case studies of past projects. These include:
    • Project objectives and challenges.
    • Innovative solutions implemented.
    • Specific deliverables e.g., designs, reports.
    • Tangible results or benefits achieved e.g., reduced construction time, cost savings, environmental impact.
    • Often include project photos, diagrams, and sometimes client testimonials with permission.
    • They link directly to project-specific pages with detailed information.
  • Benchmarkengineers.com: Lists project names but provides only generic “More Info” links that redirect to non-specific pages or external municipal/educational websites. There’s no detailed breakdown of their specific contribution, project scope, or outcomes. This lack of verifiable project data is a serious weakness.
• Client Testimonials and Social Proof:
  • Industry Standard: Most professional service firms integrate client testimonials, success stories, or links to third-party review platforms e.g., Google Business Profile, LinkedIn recommendations. This provides independent validation of their quality of work and client satisfaction.
  • Benchmarkengineers.com: No discernible client testimonials or external review integration is present.
• Legal and Privacy Compliance:
  • Industry Standard: A privacy policy, terms of service, and sometimes a disclaimer are standard practice for all websites collecting any form of user data even just via a contact form. These documents outline data handling practices, intellectual property, and user responsibilities, crucial for legal compliance and user trust.
  • Benchmarkengineers.com: Lacks any visible links to a privacy policy or terms of service. This is a significant red flag and indicates a potential oversight in legal and ethical online operation.
• Professional Registrations and Licenses:
  • Industry Standard: While stating registration is good, top-tier firms often provide direct links to the relevant state professional licensing boards or explicitly list their license numbers, allowing for easy, independent verification.
  • Benchmarkengineers.com: States their registration in Wyoming, Colorado, and Nebraska, but provides no direct links or license numbers for quick verification.
• Online Engagement and Content Marketing:
  • Industry Standard: Modern professional firms maintain active blogs, news sections, or resource libraries to share industry insights, highlight their expertise, discuss emerging trends, and demonstrate thought leadership. They also typically link to professional social media profiles LinkedIn to engage with the industry and showcase their culture.
  • Benchmarkengineers.com: The site is static. There’s no blog, news section, or links to social media, limiting their ability to demonstrate ongoing expertise and engage with a broader professional audience.
• Website Design and User Experience:
  • Industry Standard: Modern professional service websites are typically responsive, visually appealing, and designed for intuitive navigation, often with clear calls to action.
  • Benchmarkengineers.com: The design is functional but somewhat dated, and the lack of detailed content on project pages diminishes the overall user experience.

In essence, while Benchmarkengineers.com asserts its commitment to ethics and experience, its online presence does not fully demonstrate these claims through the transparency, detailed content, and legal compliance that are now standard expectations for leading professional engineering firms. This gap can lead to a perception of lower credibility and a lack of robustness compared to industry best practices.

FAQ

What is Benchmarkengineers.com?

Benchmarkengineers.com is the official website for BenchMark Engineers, P.C., a civil engineering firm based in Wyoming and Colorado, also serving Nebraska, established in 1979. Thehotsip.com Review

What services does BenchMark Engineers, P.C. offer?

BenchMark Engineers, P.C.

Offers a range of civil engineering services including Commercial, Educational, and Residential Developments, Hydrological Design, Roadway Infrastructure, Surveying Projects, Utility Infrastructure, and Planning and Feasibility.

Does Benchmarkengineers.com have a privacy policy?

No, based on the website review, Benchmarkengineers.com does not display a visible privacy policy or terms of service.

How can I contact BenchMark Engineers, P.C.?

You can contact BenchMark Engineers, P.C.

Via phone at 307-634-9064 for their Cheyenne office or 970-232-3335 for their Fort Collins office. Wooltartan.com Review

Physical addresses are also provided on their website.

Is BenchMark Engineers, P.C. licensed in other states?

Yes, the website states that BenchMark Engineers, P.C.

Is registered to practice engineering in Wyoming and licensed to practice engineering in Colorado and Nebraska.

However, direct links or specific license numbers for verification are not provided on the website.

Who is the owner of BenchMark Engineers, P.C.?

Scott D. Passrenov.com Review

Larson, Professional Engineer P.E., is the President and owner of BenchMark Engineers, P.C.

Does Benchmarkengineers.com showcase detailed project examples?

No, while the website lists “Recent Civil Engineering Projects,” the “More Info” links generally lead to generic informational pages or external sites rather than detailed case studies with project specifics or outcomes.

Are there client testimonials on Benchmarkengineers.com?

No, the website does not feature a dedicated section for client testimonials or integrated reviews.

What are the core values of BenchMark Engineers, P.C.?

The core values emphasized by BenchMark Engineers, P.C. are Honesty, Ethics, and Integrity.

Does BenchMark Engineers, P.C. offer free consultations?

The website does not explicitly state whether they offer free consultations. Fluidhosting.com Review

You would need to contact them directly to inquire about their initial consultation process and fees.

How long has BenchMark Engineers, P.C. been in business?

Was established in 1979, indicating they have been in business for 46 years as of 2024.

Can I find information about the team members on Benchmarkengineers.com?

No, the website does not provide individual profiles, biographies, or credentials for their team members, beyond mentioning the President, Scott D. Larson, and the founder, Jack Noblitt.

Does Benchmarkengineers.com have a blog or news section?

No, the website does not appear to have an active blog or news section to provide updates or industry insights.

Are there social media links on Benchmarkengineers.com?

No, there are no visible links to professional social media platforms on the Benchmarkengineers.com website. Mizansurovi1.blogspot.com Review

How does BenchMark Engineers, P.C. ensure ethical practice?

The website states that ethics are the foundation of their relationships and guide every project they lead, but it does not detail specific internal processes or oversight mechanisms for ensuring ethical practice.

Is Benchmarkengineers.com a good option for small residential projects?

The website lists “Residential Developments” as one of their services, suggesting they handle such projects.

However, specific details or examples for small-scale projects are not provided, so direct inquiry would be necessary.

How does BenchMark Engineers, P.C. contribute to the community?

Mentions participation in community service, including a strong working relationship with Habitat for Humanity of Laramie County since 2005.

Can I get an estimated cost for my project from Benchmarkengineers.com online?

No, pricing for civil engineering services is project-specific and not displayed on the website. Simpleairportparking.com Review

You would need to contact them for a customized proposal based on your project’s scope.

What is the firm’s experience level?

Claims 46 years of experience, with their staff having a combined total of over 130 years of professional experience.

Does Benchmarkengineers.com offer construction management services?

The website primarily lists civil engineering, surveying, and planning services.

While these often intersect with construction, it does not explicitly state construction management as a direct service.

You would need to clarify this directly with the firm. Cputopia.com Review