Fightthatwill.co.uk Review

Based on looking at the website Fightthatwill.co.uk, it appears to be a referral service connecting individuals to solicitors specialising in inheritance dispute claims in England and Wales. While the service itself aims to help people secure their rightful inheritance, a critical review reveals several areas where it falls short of what one would expect from a fully transparent and comprehensive legal referral platform. The primary concern from an ethical standpoint, particularly in Islamic finance, revolves around the “no-win no-fee” funding model, which can sometimes involve elements of uncertainty (gharar) or undisclosed percentage-based fees that might be considered ethically questionable if not structured carefully to avoid exploitative practices.

Here’s an overall review summary:

• Service Provided: Referral to solicitors for inheritance dispute claims.
• Geographic Scope: England and Wales.
• Solicitor Vetting: Claims to use an independent panel of SRA-registered solicitors, many are ACTAPS members.
• Initial Consultation: Free, no-obligation.
• Funding Options: Primarily “no-win no-fee,” with the bill limited to a percentage of the successful claim.
• Transparency: Lacks detailed information about specific solicitors, fee percentages, or the precise nature of the “no-win no-fee” arrangement beyond a basic description. No privacy policy, terms of service, or robust disclaimers are visibly linked from the homepage.
• Customer Testimonials: Provided, but names are changed for anonymity, and no direct verifiable links to case studies or solicitor profiles are available.
• Ethical Considerations (Islamic Finance): The “no-win no-fee” model, while common in UK law, needs careful scrutiny. In an Islamic context, any financial arrangement that involves excessive uncertainty (gharar) or a predetermined percentage of a claim that may be viewed as an unearned gain, especially if the underlying work or risk is not clearly defined, can be problematic. A service that thrives on disputes and potential ‘windfalls’ rather than clear, defined service fees could be viewed with caution.

While the intention to help individuals with inheritance claims is commendable, the lack of crucial details regarding their operational transparency and the nature of their financial model raises flags. For those seeking legal assistance, particularly with an ethical lens, more clarity is essential.

Here are some alternatives for legal assistance, focusing on clear and ethical approaches, which might be more suitable for those seeking straightforward services without the ambiguities of certain “no-win no-fee” models. These alternatives focus on providing clear, upfront information or connecting you to established legal frameworks:

• Citizens Advice Bureau

  0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

  Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Fightthatwill.co.uk Review Latest Discussions & Reviews:

  • Key Features: Free, independent, and confidential advice on a wide range of legal and practical issues, including inheritance and wills. They can guide you on initial steps and direct you to appropriate services.
  • Average Price: Free service.
  • Pros: Highly trusted, comprehensive advice, accessible nationwide, non-profit.
  • Cons: Does not provide direct legal representation, primarily an advisory service.

• Law Society Find a Solicitor

  • Key Features: Official directory to find regulated solicitors in England and Wales. You can filter by specialisation (e.g., contentious probate), location, and language. Provides direct contact information for firms.
  • Average Price: Varies by solicitor and their fee structure (hourly, fixed fee, or conditional fee arrangements are common).
  • Pros: Direct access to regulated professionals, transparent search, allows for direct communication to discuss fees.
  • Cons: Requires individual research into each firm’s ethical practices and fee structures.

• Resolution

  • Key Features: An organisation of family justice professionals committed to non-confrontational approaches. While primarily family law, some members may handle inheritance disputes related to family matters or can refer you to appropriate specialists who prioritise settlement.
  • Average Price: Varies by solicitor.
  • Pros: Focus on constructive, non-adversarial dispute resolution, which aligns with ethical principles of seeking peace and reconciliation.
  • Cons: May not directly cover all types of inheritance disputes, primarily focused on family law.

• Bar Council (Find a Barrister)

  • Key Features: Directory to find barristers in England and Wales who can provide specialist legal advice and representation, often for complex cases. Many barristers can be instructed directly by the public (public access scheme).
  • Average Price: Varies significantly based on barrister’s seniority and case complexity.
  • Pros: Highly specialised expertise, direct access for certain cases.
  • Cons: Can be more expensive, less emphasis on initial ‘free’ consultations.

• Legal Aid Agency

  • Key Features: Government-funded scheme for those who cannot afford legal representation. Eligibility is based on income and capital, and the type of case. Inheritance disputes may qualify under certain circumstances.
  • Average Price: Free for eligible individuals.
  • Pros: Provides access to justice for low-income individuals.
  • Cons: Strict eligibility criteria, limited scope of cases covered.

• Community Legal Advice Centres

  • Key Features: Offer free legal advice and representation to people in their local communities. Many are independent charities. Some specialise in certain areas of law, including welfare benefits, housing, and occasionally civil disputes like inheritance.
  • Average Price: Free.
  • Pros: Local, accessible, often provide holistic support.
  • Cons: May have limited resources, specific areas of expertise vary by centre.

• ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service)

  • Key Features: While primarily employment-focused, ACAS offers free and impartial advice on workplace issues, including dispute resolution. Their principles of conciliation can be applied metaphorically to other disputes where mediation is sought, although they do not directly handle inheritance claims. They represent a model of ethical dispute resolution.
  • Average Price: Free advice.
  • Pros: Promotes peaceful resolution, highly reputable for impartiality.
  • Cons: Not directly involved in inheritance disputes, but offers a model for ethical interaction.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

[ratemypost]

Fightthatwill.co.uk Review & First Look

Fightthatwill.co.uk positions itself as a crucial intermediary for individuals navigating the often-complex world of inheritance disputes in England and Wales. On the surface, the site offers a streamlined path to legal assistance, promising to connect users with a panel of pre-approved solicitors. The allure of a “free, no-obligation consultation” combined with a “no-win no-fee” funding model is undoubtedly attractive, especially to those feeling overwhelmed by potential legal battles and financial anxieties. However, a deeper dive into the website’s content reveals a significant lack of transparency and crucial information that ethical consumers would expect from a professional legal referral service.

Initial Impressions and User Experience

Upon landing on Fightthatwill.co.uk, the design is clean, straightforward, and relatively user-friendly. The navigation is intuitive, with clear sections like ‘Who We Are’, ‘What We Do’, ‘FAQ’s’, ‘Happy Clients’, and ‘Get In Touch’. The language used is deliberately non-legalistic, aiming to demystify complex legal “mumbo-jumbo,” which is a commendable approach for a public-facing service. The stated aim is to match clients with a solicitor who will deal with them in a “simple, courteous manner,” addressing a common pain point for individuals dealing with legal matters. The site’s primary call to action, “free, no obligation consultation,” is prominently featured, encouraging immediate engagement from distressed individuals.

Missing Key Information

Despite its user-friendly interface, the website conspicuously omits several pieces of information typically found on legitimate and trustworthy online legal platforms. There are no direct links to a comprehensive Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, or detailed disclaimers outlining the full scope of their service, especially concerning data handling and the client-solicitor relationship. While they mention being regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and the Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Solicitors (ACTAPS), this refers to the solicitors they refer, not necessarily the referral service itself. This creates an information vacuum that can leave potential clients uneasy about how their data is used and the full terms of engagement with Fightthatwill.co.uk before being passed on to a solicitor. A robust, clearly linked set of legal documents is a baseline expectation for any online service, especially one dealing with sensitive personal and financial matters.

Fightthatwill.co.uk Pros & Cons

When evaluating Fightthatwill.co.uk, it’s important to weigh the potential advantages it offers against its notable shortcomings. While it aims to simplify access to legal help for inheritance disputes, its operational transparency leaves much to be desired.

Advantages of Fightthatwill.co.uk

The primary attraction of Fightthatwill.co.uk lies in its stated mission to streamline access to legal assistance for inheritance disputes. Absolutespraymasters.co.uk Review

• Simplified Access to Specialised Legal Help: For individuals who are not familiar with the legal landscape, navigating inheritance disputes can be incredibly daunting. Fightthatwill.co.uk offers a seemingly straightforward portal to connect with solicitors who specialise in this niche area. This can save individuals significant time and effort compared to searching for a solicitor independently.
• Free Initial Consultation: The offer of a “free, no-obligation consultation” is a significant benefit. This allows potential clients to discuss their case with a professional without immediate financial commitment, helping them understand the viability of their claim and what steps might be involved. This is crucial for individuals who are already under emotional distress.
• “No-Win No-Fee” Funding Option: This funding model is highly appealing for many, as it mitigates the upfront financial risk associated with legal proceedings. Clients are generally only required to pay if their claim is successful, with the legal fees often being a percentage of the recovered inheritance. This democratises access to justice for those who might otherwise be unable to afford legal representation.
• Panel of Regulated Solicitors: The website states that its panel solicitors are registered with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and many are members of the Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Solicitors (ACTAPS). This suggests that the solicitors are professionally regulated and have expertise in contentious probate, offering a degree of assurance regarding their qualifications.
• User-Friendly Language: The deliberate avoidance of legal jargon, as highlighted on the site, is a strong positive. This makes the service more accessible and less intimidating for individuals who may be unfamiliar with legal terminology, fostering a more comfortable experience.

Disadvantages of Fightthatwill.co.uk

Despite the advantages, Fightthatwill.co.uk exhibits several significant drawbacks, primarily concerning transparency and the implications of its “no-win no-fee” model.

• Lack of Transparency on Solicitor Details: The website does not provide specific details about the individual solicitors or firms on its panel. There are no profiles, biographies, or direct links to the solicitors’ own websites. This makes it impossible for potential clients to conduct their own due diligence on the specific legal professionals they might be connected with, undermining trust. Users are effectively reliant on Fightthatwill.co.uk’s vetting process without being able to verify it themselves.
• Absence of Essential Legal Documents: Crucially, there are no visible links to a Privacy Policy, Terms and Conditions, or Disclaimers on the homepage. This is a major red flag for any online service, especially one handling sensitive personal and financial information. Users have no clear understanding of how their data is collected, stored, used, or shared, nor do they know the full terms of engagement with the referral service itself. This lack of legal documentation suggests a significant oversight in basic online operational compliance.
• Vague “No-Win No-Fee” Details: While “no-win no-fee” sounds appealing, the website offers no specific details about the percentage charged upon success. This percentage can vary significantly among firms and cases, potentially ranging from 25% to 50% (excluding VAT and disbursements) of the recovered amount. Without this crucial information upfront, clients are entering into a potentially substantial financial agreement with limited understanding of the exact costs involved. In some ethical frameworks, such as Islamic finance, mechanisms that involve excessive uncertainty (gharar) or a pre-determined percentage of an unknown future sum can be problematic if not meticulously structured to ensure fairness and transparency.
• Referral Service vs. Direct Legal Representation: It’s important for users to understand that Fightthatwill.co.uk is a referral service, not a law firm. Their role is to connect, not to represent. While this is not inherently a negative, the distinction needs to be crystal clear. The website does a reasonable job of this, but the focus on “we will fight so that you get your rightful inheritance” could inadvertently blur this line for some users.
• Limited Customer Reviews/Case Studies: While the site has a “Happy Clients” section with testimonials, these are anonymised and presented without external verification or links to more detailed case studies. Trust is built on verifiable proof, and anonymised quotes, while understandable for privacy, offer less concrete evidence of success than externally validated reviews or detailed, albeit anonymised, case summaries.
• Potential for Conflict of Interest: While not explicitly stated, the business model of a referral service often involves receiving a fee from the solicitors for each successful referral. While common, this can create a potential conflict of interest if the referral service prioritises firms that pay higher fees over those that might be the absolute best fit for the client’s specific needs and ethical considerations. Without transparency on this aspect, clients are left to assume best intentions.

In summary, Fightthatwill.co.uk offers a convenient gateway to legal assistance for inheritance disputes. However, the critical omissions regarding transparency, particularly around the specific terms of the “no-win no-fee” agreement and the lack of comprehensive legal documentation, significantly detract from its credibility and raise questions about its commitment to full disclosure.

Ethical Considerations of “No-Win No-Fee” Models in Islamic Finance

The “no-win no-fee” (Conditional Fee Agreement or CFA) model, prominently featured by Fightthatwill.co.uk, is a standard practice in the UK legal system. It allows claimants to pursue legal action without upfront costs, paying legal fees only if the case is successful, typically as a percentage of the compensation received. While this offers greater access to justice, its structure can raise significant ethical questions within an Islamic financial framework, primarily due to concepts like gharar (excessive uncertainty) and the nature of compensation.

Understanding Gharar in Financial Contracts

In Islamic finance, gharar refers to excessive uncertainty or ambiguity in a contract that could lead to unfair outcomes or disputes. Contracts with high gharar are generally prohibited because they introduce undue risk and may exploit one party.

• Application to “No-Win No-Fee”: The “no-win no-fee” model involves an inherent level of uncertainty. The outcome of a legal case is never guaranteed, making the success fee contingent on an unknown future event.
  • Uncertainty in Outcome: The success of the claim, and therefore the payment, is uncertain. While this uncertainty is part of any litigation, when the payment structure itself is entirely dependent on this uncertain outcome, it can introduce gharar.
  • Uncertainty in Fee Amount: If the fee is a percentage of the recovered amount, and the recovered amount itself is uncertain until judgment or settlement, then the exact fee payable is also uncertain at the outset of the contract. This contrasts with fixed-fee services or hourly rates where the basis of payment is clear from the beginning.

The Nature of Compensation and Riba

Another point of contention can arise if the compensation received is perceived to include elements akin to interest (riba), or if the legal process itself involves extracting more than a just share. While “no-win no-fee” specifically relates to legal costs, the larger context of how money is made or acquired is crucial. Rumneyhilldental.co.uk Review

• Excessive Fees: If the success fee is disproportionately high relative to the actual effort expended by the solicitor, or if it amounts to an excessive claim on an inheritance that is rightfully due, it could be seen as an unjust enrichment. While UK law sets caps on success fees (e.g., 25% of damages for personal injury cases, though this can vary for other types of claims), the ethical lens might question whether even within these caps, the arrangement is truly equitable.
• Focus on Dispute: The model encourages litigation, which, while sometimes necessary for justice, can also be perceived as fostering contention rather than peaceful resolution. Islamic principles often advocate for conciliation and amicable settlements where possible.

Better Alternatives for Legal Funding

Given these concerns, what are more ethically aligned alternatives for legal assistance in an Islamic context? The focus should be on transparency, clarity, and avoiding speculative financial arrangements.

1. Fixed Fee Arrangements:

   • Description: The solicitor charges a predetermined, fixed amount for a specific scope of work, regardless of the outcome.
   • Ethical Alignment: This is highly transparent. Both parties know the exact cost upfront, eliminating gharar related to the fee amount. It aligns with principles of clear compensation for defined services.
   • Practicality: Excellent for clear-cut cases or specific stages of a legal process (e.g., drafting a letter, reviewing documents, initial assessment).

2. Hourly Rate with Estimates and Caps:

   • Description: The solicitor charges based on the actual time spent, but provides a detailed estimate upfront and agrees to a maximum cap on fees for certain stages or the entire case.
   • Ethical Alignment: While still based on time, the estimate and cap introduce predictability and reduce gharar. Regular updates and transparent billing are crucial.
   • Practicality: Suitable for cases where the complexity and time required are harder to predict, but still offers a degree of financial control.

3. Legal Aid and Pro Bono Services:

   • Description: Government-funded legal assistance for those who cannot afford it (Legal Aid) or voluntary legal services provided by lawyers for free (pro bono).
   • Ethical Alignment: Highly ethical as it ensures access to justice for the vulnerable and aligns with charitable giving and community support.
   • Practicality: Eligibility for Legal Aid is often very strict, and pro bono services are limited and highly sought after.

4. Takaful (Islamic Insurance) for Legal Expenses: Permanentbeautyclinic.co.uk Review

   • Description: While not widely available for inheritance disputes specifically, the concept of Takaful could be adapted. This involves a mutual fund where participants contribute, and the fund covers legal expenses for members facing disputes, based on principles of mutual cooperation and shared risk, without elements of riba or gharar in the premium collection or payout.
   • Ethical Alignment: Directly aligns with Islamic principles of mutual assistance and risk-sharing.
   • Practicality: This is an emerging area and specific Takaful products for legal expenses might not be readily available for individual inheritance disputes in the UK.

5. Direct Negotiation and Mediation (Sulh):

   • Description: Prioritising amicable settlement through negotiation or mediation before resorting to litigation.
   • Ethical Alignment: Highly encouraged in Islam, as it promotes reconciliation, reduces animosity, and avoids lengthy, costly legal battles. Legal professionals can be engaged on a fixed-fee basis for mediation services.
   • Practicality: Often the most cost-effective and emotionally less draining approach, but requires willingness from all parties.

In conclusion, while the “no-win no-fee” model offers practical benefits for access to justice, individuals operating under Islamic ethical guidelines should approach it with caution. Seeking legal counsel that prioritises transparency, fixed fees, or other clearly defined compensation structures, and exploring avenues for amicable resolution, would be more aligned with Islamic financial principles.

Fightthatwill.co.uk Pricing

Fightthatwill.co.uk operates on a very specific pricing model: the “no-win no-fee” arrangement. This is explicitly stated on their FAQ section: “All of our solicitors offer a free initial, no obligation consultation and a wide range of funding options including ‘no-win no-fee’ This means that you will not have to pay them a penny unless your claim is successful. Their bill is then limited to a percentage of what you get.”

“No-Win No-Fee” Explained

This model, formally known as a Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) in the UK, means:

• No Upfront Costs: Clients do not pay any legal fees to the solicitor at the beginning or during the case.
• Payment on Success: Fees are only paid if the legal claim is successful, meaning the client wins their case or reaches a favourable settlement.
• Success Fee: If successful, the solicitor charges their normal fees plus an additional “success fee.” This success fee is a percentage uplift on their normal fees.
• Percentage of What You Get: The website states the bill is “limited to a percentage of what you get.” This implies the success fee will be a percentage of the compensation or inheritance recovered.

What’s Missing and Why It Matters

While the general concept is clear, the critical missing information is the specific percentage that will be charged. This percentage is crucial for potential clients to understand the true cost implications of their claim. Mitchellcycles.co.uk Review

• Lack of Specific Percentage: The website does not provide a range or a cap for this percentage. In the UK, for certain types of claims (e.g., personal injury), success fees are capped at 25% of damages for pain, suffering, and past financial losses (excluding future losses). However, for inheritance disputes, the caps can vary, and without a specific figure, potential clients are left in the dark.
• Disbursements: The “no-win no-fee” arrangement typically covers the solicitor’s professional fees. It often does not cover “disbursements” – expenses paid to third parties during the case, such as court fees, expert witness fees, barrister fees, or travel expenses. Clients are usually liable for these, win or lose, although some firms might offer deferred payment. Fightthatwill.co.uk’s homepage makes no mention of disbursements, creating a potentially misleading impression of zero financial outlay if the case is lost.
• After The Event (ATE) Insurance: To cover the risk of losing and having to pay the other side’s legal costs (if ordered by the court), solicitors often advise clients to take out After The Event (ATE) insurance. The premium for this insurance can be significant and is usually payable even if the case is lost. This is another crucial cost that is not mentioned by Fightthatwill.co.uk.
• Ethical Concerns (Islamic Finance Perspective): As discussed, the lack of a clear, upfront percentage, combined with the inherent uncertainty of the outcome, can raise gharar concerns. From an Islamic perspective, a contract should ideally have clear, defined terms and costs at the outset to avoid ambiguity and potential exploitation. The “percentage of what you get” model, without a disclosed cap or range, lacks this essential clarity.

Why Transparency is Key

For a service facilitating legal access, transparency around pricing is paramount.

1. Informed Decision-Making: Clients need to fully understand their potential financial liabilities and the proportion of their inheritance they might lose to legal fees before proceeding.
2. Trust and Credibility: A lack of clear pricing information can erode trust. Reputable legal services often provide examples of their fee structures or transparently state ranges for their success fees.
3. Financial Planning: Even if successful, a significant portion of the inheritance can be consumed by legal fees. Clients need this information for their financial planning.

In conclusion, while Fightthatwill.co.uk’s “no-win no-fee” model removes the barrier of upfront costs, its failure to disclose the percentage charged, or even the potential for other costs like disbursements and ATE insurance, represents a significant transparency deficit. For those seeking ethical and financially predictable legal solutions, this lack of detail is a serious drawback.

Fightthatwill.co.uk vs. Direct Solicitor Engagement

When facing an inheritance dispute, two primary paths emerge for securing legal representation: engaging a referral service like Fightthatwill.co.uk or directly approaching a solicitor. Each route presents distinct advantages and disadvantages that warrant careful consideration.

The Fightthatwill.co.uk Model: Referral Service

Fightthatwill.co.uk acts as an intermediary. Their stated purpose is to connect you with an independent panel of solicitors experienced in inheritance disputes.

• Pros: Stringsnthings.co.uk Review

  • Convenience: The most significant advantage is convenience. For individuals who are overwhelmed or lack the time to research solicitors, a referral service simplifies the process by presenting a pre-vetted option.
  • Specialisation Focus: They claim to connect you with solicitors specifically focused on inheritance disputes, potentially saving you the effort of filtering through general law firms.
  • “No-Win No-Fee” Access: They highlight access to solicitors offering this funding model, which can be a lifeline for those unable to afford upfront legal costs.
  • No Initial Cost to Find Solicitor: You don’t pay Fightthatwill.co.uk for the referral itself.

• Cons:

  • Lack of Transparency on Solicitor Choice: You have no direct control over which specific solicitor or firm you are matched with. There’s no public list or profiles of their panel members, making it impossible to perform your own due diligence on the solicitor’s reputation, track record, or specific expertise before the referral.
  • Hidden Referral Fees (Potential): While not stated, referral services often receive a fee from the solicitors for successful leads. This introduces a potential conflict of interest, where the choice of solicitor might be influenced by commercial arrangements rather than solely the client’s best interest.
  • Limited Information: As noted, the website itself lacks comprehensive legal documents (Privacy Policy, Terms of Service), which is a significant drawback compared to directly engaging with a regulated law firm.
  • No Direct Relationship with Referral Service: Your legal contract will be with the solicitor, not Fightthatwill.co.uk. This means any issues related to the solicitor’s service must be resolved directly with the law firm, not the referral platform.
  • Vague “No-Win No-Fee” Details: The percentage taken in a successful claim is not disclosed upfront, creating financial uncertainty.

Direct Solicitor Engagement Model

This involves identifying and approaching law firms or individual solicitors directly, either through online searches, professional directories, or personal recommendations.

• Pros:

  • Full Control Over Choice: You have complete autonomy to research, vet, and choose the specific solicitor or firm that best fits your needs, budget, and ethical preferences. You can examine their websites, read client testimonials, check their SRA record, and compare services.
  • Direct Relationship from the Start: You establish a direct professional relationship with the law firm from your initial contact. This fosters transparency and clear communication regarding fees, scope of work, and expectations.
  • Transparent Fee Structures: Reputable law firms are generally more transparent about their fee structures, whether hourly rates, fixed fees, or conditional fee arrangements (CFAs) with clear success fee percentages. You can often discuss these upfront.
  • Comprehensive Information: Law firm websites typically provide detailed information about their services, team members, specialisations, case studies, and crucially, all necessary legal documents like Privacy Policies, Terms of Business, and Complaints Procedures.
  • Tailored Advice: You can seek initial consultations from multiple firms to compare advice and approaches, allowing you to select the best fit for your specific case and circumstances.

• Cons:

  • Time and Effort Intensive: Finding the right solicitor can be time-consuming, requiring extensive research and contacting multiple firms for initial consultations.
  • Potential for Upfront Costs: While many firms offer a free initial chat, more in-depth consultations or initial work might incur costs if you opt for hourly rates or fixed fees.
  • Navigating Options: For those unfamiliar with the legal profession, discerning between firms or understanding different fee structures can be challenging.

Which Path to Choose?

For individuals prioritising transparency, control, and a thorough vetting process, direct engagement with solicitors is generally the more robust and advisable path. It allows for informed decision-making, better understanding of fee structures, and the establishment of a direct, clear professional relationship. Tools like the Law Society’s “Find a Solicitor” service (solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk) provide a reliable starting point for this independent search. Supersignsltd.co.uk Review

While a referral service like Fightthatwill.co.uk offers convenience, the significant lack of transparency regarding the solicitors on their panel and the specific terms of their “no-win no-fee” model, combined with the absence of essential legal documentation, makes it a less desirable option for those who value full disclosure and ethical clarity in their legal engagements.

How to Cancel Fightthatwill.co.uk Subscription / Free Trial

It’s crucial to understand that Fightthatwill.co.uk is a referral service, not a subscription service or a platform that offers a “free trial” in the traditional sense. Therefore, the concepts of “cancelling a subscription” or “cancelling a free trial” as one would with a software service or streaming platform do not directly apply to Fightthatwill.co.uk.

Understanding the Engagement Model

1. Initial Contact: You typically engage with Fightthatwill.co.uk by filling out a contact form for a “free, no-obligation consultation.”
2. Referral: If your case is deemed viable, Fightthatwill.co.uk refers you to one of their panel solicitors.
3. Solicitor Engagement: Your formal legal agreement (the “no-win no-fee” agreement or Conditional Fee Agreement) is then established directly with the solicitor’s firm, not with Fightthatwill.co.uk.

How to Discontinue Engagement with Fightthatwill.co.uk

If you have only made an initial enquiry through Fightthatwill.co.uk and have not yet been formally connected with a solicitor, or if you simply wish to withdraw your interest after an initial conversation, you can simply:

• Cease Communication: Do not respond to any follow-up emails or calls from Fightthatwill.co.uk.
• Send a Withdrawal Email: If you prefer a formal approach, you can email them (their contact email is usually found on the “Get In Touch” section or in their confirmation emails) stating that you no longer wish to proceed with their service.
• No Obligation: Since the initial consultation is “no-obligation,” there are no financial penalties or formal cancellation processes required for simply withdrawing your interest at this stage.

How to Discontinue Engagement with a Referred Solicitor

If you have already been referred to a solicitor by Fightthatwill.co.uk and have signed a formal “no-win no-fee” agreement (or any other retainer agreement) directly with that solicitor’s firm, then you are now bound by the terms of that agreement with the solicitor.

• Review Your Client Care Letter/Agreement: The first step is to carefully review the client care letter or the Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) you signed with the solicitor’s firm. This document will outline the terms of your engagement, including how to terminate the agreement.
• Contact Your Solicitor Directly: You must contact the solicitor’s firm directly to express your wish to cease their services. This should ideally be done in writing (email is usually acceptable, followed by a formal letter if required).
• Potential Costs on Termination:
  • Termination by You (before success): If you terminate the agreement with the solicitor before your case is resolved successfully, your solicitor may be entitled to charge you for the work they have already done on an hourly basis, even if the agreement was “no-win no-fee.” This is a standard clause in most CFAs to protect the solicitor’s investment of time and resources. The exact terms will be in your agreement.
  • Disbursements: You will likely still be liable for any disbursements (costs paid to third parties like court fees, barrister fees, expert reports) incurred on your behalf up to the point of termination.
  • After The Event (ATE) Insurance: If you took out ATE insurance, you might be liable for the premium if the policy is cancelled after a certain period or if it has already been activated.

Key Takeaway: Direct Communication with the Solicitor

The critical point is that once you sign an agreement with a solicitor referred by Fightthatwill.co.uk, your legal and financial obligations shift entirely to that solicitor’s firm. Any “cancellation” or discontinuation of services must be handled directly with the solicitor according to the terms of your signed client care letter and agreement, not through Fightthatwill.co.uk. It’s always advisable to seek clarification from your solicitor regarding any potential fees before terminating your agreement. Pest-control-colchester.co.uk Review

FAQs

What is Fightthatwill.co.uk?

Fightthatwill.co.uk is a UK-based online referral service that connects individuals with solicitors specialising in inheritance dispute claims in England and Wales. Their stated goal is to help people secure their rightful inheritance.

How does Fightthatwill.co.uk work?

You submit an enquiry via their contact form, and they offer a free, no-obligation consultation. If your case is assessed as viable, they then refer you to one of their panel solicitors who will handle your case.

Does Fightthatwill.co.uk provide legal advice directly?

No, Fightthatwill.co.uk is a referral service. They do not provide direct legal advice or representation themselves. They connect you with independent solicitors who will provide the legal services.

What is a “no-win no-fee” agreement with Fightthatwill.co.uk’s solicitors?

A “no-win no-fee” agreement (Conditional Fee Agreement) means you only pay your solicitor’s legal fees if your inheritance claim is successful. If you lose, you generally don’t pay their professional fees.

What percentage does Fightthatwill.co.uk’s solicitors take if I win?

Fightthatwill.co.uk’s website states that the solicitor’s bill is “limited to a percentage of what you get” if your claim is successful. However, the exact percentage is not disclosed on their website and would be detailed in the specific Conditional Fee Agreement you sign with the referred solicitor. Fillmyfunnel.co.uk Review

Are there any upfront costs with Fightthatwill.co.uk or their solicitors?

Fightthatwill.co.uk offers a free initial consultation. With the “no-win no-fee” model, you generally don’t pay upfront legal fees to the solicitor. However, you may be liable for “disbursements” (e.g., court fees, expert reports) or After The Event (ATE) insurance premiums, which are typically not covered by the “no-win no-fee” agreement and are not explicitly mentioned on Fightthatwill.co.uk’s homepage.

Are the solicitors referred by Fightthatwill.co.uk regulated?

Yes, Fightthatwill.co.uk states that their independent panel of solicitors are fully registered with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and many are members of the Association of Contentious Trust and Probate Solicitors (ACTAPS).

Can I choose my solicitor through Fightthatwill.co.uk?

The website indicates they aim to “match you up with the right solicitor for your case.” It does not suggest that you have a direct choice or selection from a list of profiles; rather, they make the referral based on their internal assessment.

Is Fightthatwill.co.uk transparent about its operations?

No, Fightthatwill.co.uk lacks significant transparency. Its website does not provide links to essential legal documents such as a Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, or detailed disclaimers regarding their referral process or the full financial implications of a “no-win no-fee” agreement.

How long do I have to make an inheritance claim?

Fightthatwill.co.uk advises that time limits can be as short as 6 months, urging prompt contact. It’s crucial to seek professional advice immediately as limitation periods vary depending on the specific nature of the claim. Njcasemanagement.co.uk Review

What types of inheritance claims does Fightthatwill.co.uk assist with?

They assist with claims where there’s an unfair, invalid, fraudulent, lost or destroyed will, if the inheritance amount is unfair, if a relative didn’t make a will, or if a promised inheritance was not received or was less than promised.

Are the “Happy Clients” testimonials on Fightthatwill.co.uk verifiable?

The testimonials provided are anonymised, with names changed to preserve privacy. While understandable, this means they cannot be directly verified through external sources or linked to specific solicitor profiles.

What should I do if I am unhappy with a solicitor referred by Fightthatwill.co.uk?

Your legal contract is with the solicitor’s firm, not Fightthatwill.co.uk. You should refer to your client care letter for the solicitor’s complaints procedure and follow that process directly with the law firm.

Can I cancel my engagement after Fightthatwill.co.uk has referred me to a solicitor?

If you have already signed an agreement with a referred solicitor, you must follow the termination clauses outlined in your client care letter or Conditional Fee Agreement directly with the solicitor’s firm. You may be liable for costs incurred up to that point.

Is Fightthatwill.co.uk suitable for complex inheritance disputes?

While they claim their solicitors are experienced in contentious probate, the suitability for highly complex disputes would depend on the specific solicitor they refer you to. The website itself doesn’t provide enough detail to assess this fully. Characterinns.co.uk Review

Does Fightthatwill.co.uk charge me for the referral?

No, Fightthatwill.co.uk explicitly states that the initial consultation is free and no-obligation, implying no direct charge to you for the referral service itself. Their business model likely involves receiving fees from the solicitors for successful referrals.

What are the ethical concerns with “no-win no-fee” from an Islamic perspective?

From an Islamic finance perspective, “no-win no-fee” agreements can raise concerns related to gharar (excessive uncertainty) due to the contingent nature of payment and the unknown percentage. They may also be viewed cautiously if they contribute to excessive litigation rather than amicable resolution.

What are better alternatives to “no-win no-fee” in an ethical context?

More ethically aligned alternatives include fixed-fee arrangements, hourly rates with clear estimates and caps, seeking legal aid or pro bono services, or prioritising mediation and direct negotiation to achieve amicable settlements.

How can I find a solicitor directly without using a referral service?

You can use official directories like the Law Society’s “Find a Solicitor” tool, consult with the Citizens Advice Bureau, or seek recommendations from trusted sources. This allows you to vet solicitors directly and understand their terms upfront.

What information should a trustworthy legal referral service provide on its website?

A trustworthy legal referral service should provide clear links to its Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, a transparent explanation of its referral process, details about how solicitors are vetted, and ideally, information on the range of potential success fees or costs associated with referred services. Uniekecare.co.uk Review