Blastingnews.com Review

Based on checking the website, Blastingnews.com presents itself as a global news publisher committed to independent and accurate journalism, aiming to offer diverse perspectives to its readers.

While it boasts a substantial readership and a large network of contributors, a detailed review of its homepage reveals certain aspects that require closer scrutiny, especially concerning transparency in its content generation and long-term financial viability for contributors.

Overall Review Summary:

• Website Focus: Global news publishing with a focus on diverse perspectives.
• Content Model: User-generated content from freelancers “Blasters” verified by reviewers and internal newsroom staff.
• Claimed Reach: 30 million monthly readers, 1 million+ subscribers, 16,000 articles/videos monthly.
• Transparency & Credibility Claims: NewsGuard Green Shield, adherence to “The Trust Project” standards though not a member, EU’s Eunomia project partner, Google News Innovation Fund awardee, Regione Sicilia awardee for fighting misinformation.
• Monetization for Contributors: Meritocratic compensation based on engaged readers. over 12 million euros paid out.
• Areas for Concern: Reliance on a vast freelance network, potential for quality inconsistencies, and the inherent challenges of monetizing news solely through reader engagement for a global platform. The business model, while innovative, leans heavily on individual content performance, which can be inconsistent for contributors.

The detailed explanation reveals that Blastingnews.com positions itself as a disruptive force in the news industry, moving away from traditional editorial biases by embracing a multitude of voices.

This “every voice counts” philosophy, while admirable, necessitates an incredibly robust and consistent fact-checking and curation process, given the volume of content published.

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Blastingnews.com Review Latest Discussions & Reviews:

Their stated commitment to fighting fake news, backed by collaborations with entities like NewsGuard, the EU, Google, and the University of Palermo, is a strong positive.

However, the reliance on a compensation model tied directly to “engaged readers” for freelancers could inadvertently incentivize sensationalism over objective reporting, even with vetting processes in place.

For readers seeking purely objective and consistently high-quality journalism without the inherent variability of a vast freelance model, Blastingnews.com might be a mixed bag.

Best Alternatives for Ethical News Consumption:

Since Blastingnews.com is a news platform, the ethical considerations revolve around the veracity and bias of information.

Therefore, alternatives focus on reputable, well-established news organizations with strong journalistic standards.

• Associated Press AP
  • Key Features: Global, non-profit news agency. known for objective, factual reporting. provides news to thousands of media outlets worldwide.
  • Average Price: Free access to many articles via partner sites. some direct subscriptions may exist.
  • Pros: Highly reliable, minimal bias, foundational source for many news outlets, comprehensive global coverage.
  • Cons: Not always the first to break sensational news, more factual than opinionated.
• Reuters
  • Key Features: International news organization. renowned for its accuracy and speed in delivering financial and general news.
  • Average Price: Free access to many articles. subscription for premium content.
  • Pros: High journalistic standards, excellent for financial news, strong emphasis on facts.
  • Cons: Content can be dense for general readers, less focused on lifestyle or softer news.
• BBC News
  • Key Features: Public service broadcaster with extensive global news coverage. known for impartiality though sometimes debated and in-depth reporting.
  • Average Price: Free.
  • Pros: Wide range of topics, often first to report on major international events, strong emphasis on balanced reporting.
  • Cons: Can be perceived as having a UK-centric bias by some, occasional political controversies.
• The Guardian
  • Key Features: British newspaper with a strong international presence. known for investigative journalism and left-leaning but often well-researched content.
  • Average Price: Free with voluntary contributions.
  • Pros: Deep investigative reports, global coverage, strong stance on human rights and environmental issues.
  • Cons: Distinct editorial slant left-leaning, extensive opinion pieces can sometimes overshadow factual reporting.
• NPR National Public Radio
  • Key Features: Non-profit media organization in the US. known for its in-depth audio journalism and thoughtful analysis.
  • Pros: Excellent for nuanced discussions and expert interviews, wide range of topics beyond breaking news.
  • Cons: Primarily audio-focused, some content may be perceived as liberal-leaning.
• Al Jazeera
  • Key Features: Qatari state-funded broadcaster. provides global news coverage with a strong focus on the Middle East and developing countries.
  • Pros: Offers alternative perspectives to Western media, strong on-the-ground reporting in often underreported regions.
  • Cons: Perceived by some as having a Qatari government influence, occasional criticism regarding bias.
• Christian Science Monitor
  • Key Features: Non-profit news organization focusing on global issues. known for its constructive journalism and in-depth analysis.
  • Average Price: Free with voluntary subscriptions.
  • Pros: Exceptionally thoughtful and balanced reporting, focuses on solutions and underlying causes, less sensational.
  • Cons: Smaller scale than major news outlets, less emphasis on breaking news.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Blastingnews.com Review & First Look

Blastingnews.com positions itself as a dynamic global news platform, a departure from traditional media.

Upon a first look, the website immediately conveys a sense of current events, with sections dedicated to “Breaking News from the world” and trending topics across various countries.

The design is clean and user-friendly, prioritizing content visibility.

What immediately catches the eye are the direct links to country-specific portals like News Italy, News Brasil, and News US, indicating a truly localized approach to global news.

The Blastingnews.com Model: An Overview

Blastingnews.com operates on a unique model: it combines user-generated content from a vast network of freelancers—dubbed “Blasters”—with a rigorous review process. The site claims to publish approximately 16,000 news articles and videos each month, a staggering volume that highlights the scale of its operation. This model aims to offer a “multiplicity of angles,” presenting stories from diverse perspectives “without taking sides.” Inbouwnavigatie.com Review

Initial Impressions of Credibility Claims

The homepage prominently features several badges and affiliations that attempt to bolster its credibility.

The platform also mentions collaborations with the European Union Eunomia project, Google News Innovation Fund, and Regione Sicilia to combat fake news, all of which lend an air of legitimacy to their efforts in fighting misinformation.

Blastingnews.com Features: A Deep Dive into its Offering

Delving deeper into Blastingnews.com’s features reveals a platform striving to be more than just a news aggregator.

Its core functionality revolves around content consumption and creation, aiming to foster engagement through “Channels” and a unique contributor ecosystem.

Stay Tuned – Join the Channels

The concept of “Channels” is central to the Blastingnews.com experience. Stpancrasrecruitment.com Review

These are described as “communities of engaged users around specific vertical topics.” The homepage showcases examples like “Channel Ciclismo” for Italy, “Channel Tecnologia” for Brasil, and “Channel Celebrities” for the US.

Users are encouraged to “follow your passions” by joining these channels to receive live updates and discuss with “like-minded people.” This feature aims to personalize the news feed, allowing readers to filter content based on their interests.

The Channels are curated by “teams of experts” and blend “verified and professionally curated news, written by our contributors and verified by our Reviewers, but also from official social media accounts and a lot of other leading publisher feeds.” This hybrid approach suggests a blend of original content and aggregation.

The Contributor Ecosystem: “Blasters” and “Reviewers”

Blastingnews.com boasts an impressive network of “2,000 freelancers writing in 5 different languages” across “8 countries.” This extensive pool forms the backbone of its content generation.

The site outlines a clear process for contributors: “Any professional journalist, freelancer, matter expert or qualified person can become a collaborator of Blasting News which we term ‘Blaster’ and propose a news article in either written, audio or video format.” A crucial requirement for publication is that “Every news article needs at least two documented sources either primary or secondary to be considered for publication and will be verified by a Reviewer and our professional editorial staff.” This multi-layered vetting process is designed to ensure accuracy, which is vital given the volume and diverse origins of content. Luminarysoftware.us Review

Monetization Through Meritocracy

A standout feature is Blastingnews.com’s compensation system for contributors, described as “meritocratic principles.” The platform states, “the higher number of engaged readers that each news article receives, the higher compensation for the contributor.” They claim to have “paid more than 12 million euros to our contributors so far.” This performance-based model, while potentially lucrative for popular articles, also presents a challenge.

It places the onus on contributors to create engaging content that resonates with a broad audience, which could inadvertently lead to a focus on trending or sensational topics over in-depth, less click-worthy investigative journalism.

Blastingnews.com Pros & Cons: A Balanced Perspective

Evaluating Blastingnews.com requires a look at both its strengths and potential weaknesses.

While the platform innovates in content creation and dissemination, certain aspects of its model warrant consideration.

Pros of Blastingnews.com

• Diverse Perspectives: By employing a vast network of freelancers, Blastingnews.com aims to offer news from “a multiplicity of angles,” theoretically reducing the single-minded bias often found in traditional media. This aligns with its stated mission of allowing readers to “build informed opinions.”
• Extensive Global Coverage: With active operations in 8 countries and content in 5 languages, the platform provides a truly global reach. This is evident in the localized news sections for Italy, Brazil, France, Spain, UK, and US.
• Innovative Compensation Model for Contributors: The meritocratic system, paying contributors based on reader engagement, has reportedly led to significant payouts over 12 million euros. This can incentivize quality and relevant content creation for those who master the platform’s engagement metrics.
• User-Centric “Channels”: The ability to follow specific thematic channels allows for a personalized news experience, enabling users to focus on topics that genuinely interest them.

Cons of Blastingnews.com

• Potential for Quality Inconsistency: Despite the multi-layered review process, managing the quality and factual accuracy across “16,000 news articles and videos each month” from “2,000 freelancers” is a monumental task. The sheer volume might lead to occasional lapses in rigorous fact-checking or journalistic standards.
• Reliance on Engagement-Based Compensation: While designed to reward popular content, a model tied directly to “engaged readers” could inadvertently encourage clickbait or sensationalism to maximize views and payouts, potentially compromising objective reporting.
• Limited Direct Editorial Control: Unlike traditional newsrooms with a centralized editorial vision, Blastingnews.com’s decentralized freelance model, even with reviewers, inherently implies less direct control over the narrative and tone of every piece.
• “Adherence” vs. “Membership” in Trust Initiatives: While Blastingnews.com states it “adheres to ‘The Trust Project’ quality standards” and “has requested to be part of it,” the clarification that it “is not a member of the programme” yet is a point of nuance. It signifies intent but not full, official recognition in the same vein as actual members.
• Privacy and Data Sharing: The prominent cookie consent banner indicates sharing of user data with “1545 partners who deal with web data analysis, advertising, and social media.” While common, the large number of partners might raise privacy concerns for some users.

Blastingnews.com Alternatives: Where to Find Reliable and Ethical News

Given the nuances of Blastingnews.com’s model, particularly its reliance on a vast freelance network and engagement-based compensation, some readers might seek alternatives that offer a more traditional or consistently verified approach to news. Agatha.boutique Review

When seeking ethical news, the focus is on sources known for their journalistic integrity, independence, and minimal bias.

Factors for Choosing Alternatives:

• Editorial Independence: Look for organizations not beholden to political parties, corporate interests, or single agendas.
• Fact-Checking Standards: Prioritize outlets with transparent and rigorous fact-checking processes.
• Transparency: Reputable news sources clearly state their ownership, funding, and editorial guidelines.
• Diversity of Sources: While not always possible within a single article, a good news organization will often cite multiple sources and perspectives over time.

Top Ethical News Alternatives:

1. Associated Press AP: As a non-profit news cooperative, the AP is widely considered one of the most reliable and unbiased sources of factual news. They provide the raw material for countless other news outlets globally. Their reporting is typically lean, fact-focused, and avoids sensationalism.
2. Reuters: Similar to AP, Reuters is a global news agency known for its speed, accuracy, and neutrality, particularly in financial and breaking news. They are often the first to report major events, with a strong emphasis on verifiable facts.
3. BBC News: The British Broadcasting Corporation’s news division is a publicly funded organization with a long-standing reputation for comprehensive international coverage and efforts towards impartiality. While it faces occasional political scrutiny, its global reach and detailed reporting are undeniable.
4. National Public Radio NPR: For those in the US, NPR offers in-depth audio journalism and thoughtful analysis, often providing a more nuanced take on complex issues than many commercial outlets. Their focus on long-form interviews and investigative pieces makes them a valuable resource.
5. The Guardian: A UK-based newspaper with a strong global presence, The Guardian is known for its investigative journalism and progressive stance on social and environmental issues. While it has a distinct editorial lean, its reporting is often well-researched and impactful.
6. Al Jazeera: Providing a non-Western perspective on global events, Al Jazeera English offers extensive coverage, particularly from the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. It can be a valuable source for understanding international affairs from a different angle.
7. Christian Science Monitor: This non-profit news organization is highly respected for its balanced, insightful, and often solutions-oriented approach to journalism. It tends to focus on broader trends and the underlying causes of events, making it a good source for deeper understanding rather than just breaking headlines.

These alternatives generally emphasize traditional journalistic ethics, providing a more predictable and often more in-depth experience for readers prioritizing verified, impartial information.

How to Work with Blastingnews.com for Contributors

Blastingnews.com actively recruits individuals interested in contributing news content, offering various roles within its ecosystem.

For anyone looking to share their expertise or journalistic skills, understanding the pathways to involvement is key.

Becoming a “Blaster” Content Contributor

The primary entry point for creators is becoming a “Blaster.” This role is open to a wide range of individuals: “Any professional journalist, freelancer, matter expert or qualified person.” Blasters can propose content in various formats: “written, audio or video format.” The key to successful submission lies in adhering to their sourcing requirements: “Every news article needs at least two documented sources either primary or secondary to be considered for publication.” This stipulation emphasizes their commitment to verifiable information. Blesstest.com Review

After submission, content undergoes a multi-stage review process, first by a “Reviewer” and then by their “internal newsroom in London.” To express interest in becoming a Blaster, the website directs potential contributors to “contact us.”

Becoming a “Reviewer” Content Vetting

For seasoned professionals, particularly journalists, the “Reviewer” role is crucial to Blastingnews.com’s quality control.

“It is required to be a professional journalist” to become a Reviewer.

These individuals are responsible for the initial screening and verification of submitted content before it reaches the editorial staff.

This role underscores the platform’s layered approach to ensuring factual accuracy. Shakerchaise.com Review

Interested professional journalists can also “contact us” for this position.

Opportunities for “Investigative Reporting”

Blastingnews.com also extends an invitation for “investigative reporting.” This suggests a commitment to in-depth journalism beyond simple news aggregation.

While the specific requirements for investigative reporting are not detailed on the homepage, the call for it indicates a desire for original, impactful content.

Those interested in pursuing investigative work are encouraged to “contact us.”

Roles for “Influencers” and “Field Experts”

Beyond core content creation and review, Blastingnews.com offers opportunities for “Social Blasters” and “Channel Managers.” Datapluss.com Review

• Social Blasters: These are “distributed digital micro-influencers” who promote Blastingnews.com’s top news articles. This role taps into the power of social media for content dissemination. Interested individuals are directed to check out “BlastingX” and then “contact us.”
• Channel Managers: These “teams of experts” are responsible for managing and curating the thematic “Channels.” This role requires expertise in specific fields to ensure the quality and relevance of content within a particular niche. Those interested in becoming a Channel Manager can “contact us.”

The diverse range of roles indicates Blastingnews.com’s comprehensive strategy for content creation, curation, and promotion, leveraging a broad spectrum of talent.

Blastingnews.com Pricing: Understanding the Contributor Compensation Model

Blastingnews.com’s “pricing” model isn’t about subscription fees for readers, but rather about how it compensates its contributors. The platform operates on a unique, performance-based system designed to reward content that genuinely engages readers.

The Meritocratic Compensation System

The core of Blastingnews.com’s financial incentive for its “Blasters” content contributors is a “meritocratic compensation system.” This means that payouts are directly tied to the impact and reach of an individual’s published work. The website explicitly states: “the higher number of engaged readers that each news article receives, the higher compensation for the contributor.” This model distinguishes it from traditional freelance journalism, which often pays per word or per article, regardless of its post-publication performance.

How Engagement is Measured

While the homepage text doesn’t provide granular detail on how “engaged readers” are precisely measured, industry standards typically involve metrics like:

• Page Views: The total number of times an article is viewed.
• Time on Page: How long readers spend on an article, indicating deeper engagement than a quick click-through.
• Shares and Comments: Social media shares and on-site comments often indicate that the content resonated enough for readers to interact with it.
• Returning Readers: Whether users come back to read more content from the same author or topic.

It’s likely Blastingnews.com uses a combination of these and potentially other proprietary metrics to calculate the engagement score that determines a contributor’s payout. Smdtc.org Review

Transparency in Payouts

Blastingnews.com makes a bold claim regarding its total payouts: “Following this method, we have paid more than 12 million euros to our contributors so far.” This figure, if accurate, suggests a significant investment in its freelance network and indicates that successful contributors can indeed earn substantial income from the platform. However, it’s worth noting that this is a cumulative figure over an unspecified period, and individual earnings would vary wildly based on consistent performance and article virality.

Implications for Contributors

For potential contributors, this model presents both opportunities and challenges:

• Opportunity for High Earners: Talented writers who can consistently produce highly engaging content may find Blastingnews.com a lucrative platform.
• Variability in Income: Income is not guaranteed or fixed per article. A piece that doesn’t gain traction will yield little to no compensation, which introduces financial uncertainty for contributors.
• Incentive for Virality: The model can inadvertently incentivize content that is designed to go viral or generate clicks, rather than purely objective or deeply investigative pieces that might not have immediate mass appeal. This can create tension between journalistic integrity and the need to earn.
• Focus on Promotion: Contributors may need to actively promote their articles to maximize “engaged readers,” effectively becoming their own marketers within the platform.

Overall, Blastingnews.com’s pricing model is a key differentiator in the news industry, attempting to align contributor compensation with readership impact.

Blastingnews.com vs. Traditional News Outlets: A Comparative Analysis

When evaluating Blastingnews.com, it’s useful to compare its model against traditional news outlets.

This comparison highlights its innovative aspects as well as potential trade-offs in the pursuit of a decentralized, global news platform. Lucyandsam.com Review

Content Generation Model

• Blastingnews.com: Relies heavily on a vast network of 2,000 freelance “Blasters” from diverse backgrounds. Content is submitted, then reviewed by “Reviewers” professional journalists and an internal editorial team. This decentralized model aims for “every voice counts” and a “multiplicity of angles.”
• Traditional News Outlets e.g., New York Times, BBC, Reuters: Primarily employ a staff of salaried journalists, reporters, and editors. Content is largely generated in-house, with strict editorial hierarchies and style guides. Freelancers are used, but typically for specific assignments, and their work is integrated into a consistent editorial voice.

Editorial Control and Bias

• Blastingnews.com: States its mission is to “offer independent and accurate journalism” and “without taking sides.” It aims to present “the story from every angle, even if we don’t agree with all of them, so that you can build informed opinions.” While internal review exists, the diverse freelance base inherently means a less unified editorial stance.
• Traditional News Outlets: Often have a clear editorial line, even if striving for impartiality. For instance, The Guardian is known for its left-leaning perspective, while The Wall Street Journal is generally seen as conservative. Their internal editorial staff maintains a consistent voice and direction across all published content. While striving for objectivity, inherent biases can exist based on ownership, funding, or journalistic philosophy.

Monetization for Content Creators

• Blastingnews.com: Utilizes a “meritocratic compensation system” where “the higher number of engaged readers that each news article receives, the higher compensation for the contributor.” This performance-based model means earning potential is directly tied to an article’s virality and popularity.
• Traditional News Outlets: Typically pay journalists and staff writers salaries or fixed rates per article/assignment. While performance might influence bonuses or career progression, direct compensation is not usually tied to individual article engagement metrics. This provides more financial stability for journalists but may not always incentivize mass appeal.

Credibility and Trust Mechanisms

• Blastingnews.com: Highlights external validations like the NewsGuard Green Shield, adherence to The Trust Project standards though not a member, and collaborations with the EU, Google, and academic institutions to fight misinformation. This proactive approach to trust is a significant selling point.
• Traditional News Outlets: Build credibility through decades or centuries of established journalistic practice, reputation, awards e.g., Pulitzer Prizes, and clear editorial policies. They rely on their brand name and long-standing public trust. Many are also members of professional journalistic organizations and adhere to industry ethical codes.

Audience Engagement

• Blastingnews.com: Emphasizes “Channels” for topic-specific communities and encourages discussion among “like-minded people.” The focus on “engaged readers” for compensation also suggests a strong push for interactive content.
• Traditional News Outlets: While they increasingly encourage comments and shares, their primary focus remains on disseminating information to a broad audience. Engagement is often measured differently, perhaps more in terms of subscriber numbers or overall reach.

In summary, Blastingnews.com offers an intriguing alternative model that prioritizes a broad range of voices and direct engagement, potentially disrupting traditional news gatekeepers.

However, this comes with the inherent challenges of managing quality at scale and ensuring consistent editorial vision across a decentralized network.

Traditional outlets, while perhaps slower to adapt, often provide a more controlled and consistent journalistic product backed by established reputations.

Transparency and Editorial Lines at Blastingnews.com

A critical aspect of any news platform’s credibility lies in its transparency and clearly defined editorial guidelines.

Blastingnews.com dedicates a specific section on its homepage to these principles, outlining how it aims to uphold journalistic integrity. Buschartersvip.com Review

Key Information in the Transparency Area

Blastingnews.com states that users can find “key information about us in the transparency area.” This includes a comprehensive list of policies and guidelines that are crucial for understanding the platform’s operational ethics:

• Editorial Processes: This would detail the steps involved from content submission to publication, including the roles of Blasters, Reviewers, and the internal newsroom. Understanding this process is vital for assessing how quality and accuracy are maintained.
• Contributors Diversity Policy: This policy would outline their commitment to diversity in their pool of “2,000 freelancers,” aiming to ensure a wide range of voices and perspectives are represented, regardless of “race, class, age, gender and geography.”
• Ethics Policy: This fundamental policy governs the conduct expected of all contributors and staff, addressing issues like impartiality, conflicts of interest, and responsible reporting.
• Corrections Policy: A clear policy on how errors are acknowledged and corrected is a hallmark of responsible journalism. This section would detail the procedure for requesting corrections and how they are implemented.
• Verification/Fact Checking Standards: Given the volume of content and the freelance model, the specifics of their fact-checking process are paramount. This policy would explain the methodologies used to verify claims and sources.
• Unnamed Sources Policy: This policy addresses the use of anonymous sources, which can be critical for investigative journalism but also require strict guidelines to maintain credibility and prevent abuse.
• Actionable Feedback Policy: This policy would outline how Blastingnews.com handles feedback from readers and contributors, ensuring a mechanism for addressing concerns and improving the platform.

The presence of such a detailed list of policies indicates a commitment to transparency, which is a positive sign for any news organization.

Beyond Policy: External Validations

In addition to its internal policies, Blastingnews.com leverages external validations to reinforce its commitment to ethical journalism.

• NewsGuard Green Shield: They prominently feature having been awarded the “Green Shield by fulfilling all nine criteria of transparency and credibility” by NewsGuard, a widely recognized authority in rating news site trustworthiness. NewsGuard uses journalistic principles to combat disinformation.
• “The Trust Project”: Blastingnews.com claims adherence to “The Trust Project – News with Integrity” quality standards, which are promoted by the University of Santa Clara. While they clarify they are “not a member of the programme, but has requested to be part of it,” their stated alignment with these principles demonstrates an intent to meet high journalistic benchmarks. The Trust Project establishes principles for accurate and transparent journalism.

The combination of internal detailed policies and external collaborations provides a robust framework for Blastingnews.com’s claims of transparency and commitment to accurate, ethical journalism.

Staff & Corporate Structure of Blastingnews.com

Understanding the people behind a news organization and its financial backing is crucial for assessing its independence and editorial direction. Ibexx.com Review

Blastingnews.com provides insights into both its human resources and its corporate structure on its homepage.

Diverse Staff and Global Presence

Blastingnews.com highlights its commitment to diversity within its workforce, stating that it “relies on 2,000 contributors, with no limitation of race, class, age, gender and geography.” This emphasizes their open-door policy for talent acquisition. Beyond the freelance contributors, the platform also “seeks diverse voices in its management staff.” This indicates an effort to ensure that the leadership reflects a broad range of backgrounds and perspectives.

The company has a clear international footprint, employing “professionals from more than 7 different nationalities in our offices in London headquarters, Milan, New York and Rome.” This global presence in key cities underscores its ambition to be a truly international news player. The mention of its headquarters in London further solidifies its operational base.

Independent and Privately Funded

Regarding its corporate structure and funding, Blastingnews.com explicitly states its independence: “We are an independent, private company funded by a number of private shareholders and family offices.” This is a significant piece of information as it implies that the company is not beholden to large corporate conglomerates, government entities, or single influential investors that might seek to sway editorial content. The funding from “private shareholders and family offices” suggests a more distributed ownership model, which can contribute to editorial independence.

Separation of Business and Editorial Decisions

A key tenet of journalistic integrity is the separation of commercial interests from editorial content. Blastingnews.com addresses this directly by stating: “As a result, business decisions, but not editorial decisions, take shareholder value in mind.” This is a crucial distinction. It means that while the company’s financial operations are geared towards profitability for its shareholders, the content creation and news reporting processes are supposedly insulated from these commercial pressures. This structural safeguard is designed to ensure that journalistic accuracy and independence are prioritized over financial gains in news coverage. Freestraighttalk.net Review

Further information on the staff and corporate structure is provided through links to “More about our staff” and “More about our corporate structure“, allowing for a deeper dive into these aspects for interested parties.

The transparency around its funding model and the clear demarcation between business and editorial decisions are positive indicators for Blastingnews.com’s commitment to journalistic integrity.

FAQ

What is Blastingnews.com?

Blastingnews.com is a global online news publisher that aims to provide independent and accurate journalism by presenting news from multiple angles.

It relies on a network of freelance contributors “Blasters” and a multi-layered review process to produce and verify its content.

Is Blastingnews.com a trustworthy news source?

Based on its homepage claims, Blastingnews.com strives for trustworthiness by being recognized with NewsGuard’s Green Shield and adhering to The Trust Project’s standards, along with partnerships with the EU and Google for fighting fake news. Asian-bookies.net Review

However, the sheer volume of content from a large freelance network means readers should always apply critical thinking, as with any online source.

How does Blastingnews.com make money?

Blastingnews.com’s primary revenue streams likely come from advertising, given its large readership base and reliance on a performance-based compensation model for contributors.

It is a private company funded by private shareholders and family offices.

Can anyone write for Blastingnews.com?

Yes, Blastingnews.com states that “any professional journalist, freelancer, matter expert or qualified person” can become a “Blaster” and contribute news articles, videos, or audio content, provided they adhere to the requirement of at least two documented sources.

How are contributors paid on Blastingnews.com?

Contributors are paid through a “meritocratic compensation system” where their earnings are directly tied to the “number of engaged readers” their news articles receive. Firstendurance.com Review

The more engagement an article generates, the higher the compensation.

What is the “Green Shield” awarded to Blastingnews.com?

The “Green Shield” is an award from NewsGuard, an organization that rates the trustworthiness of news sites.

Blastingnews.com states it was awarded the Green Shield for fulfilling NewsGuard’s nine criteria of transparency and credibility.

Does Blastingnews.com adhere to The Trust Project standards?

Yes, Blastingnews.com states it adheres to “The Trust Project – News with Integrity” quality standards, although it clarifies that it is not yet a formal member of the program but has requested to be part of it.

What are “Channels” on Blastingnews.com?

“Channels” on Blastingnews.com are thematic communities where users can follow specific topics of interest, receive live updates, and engage in discussions with like-minded people. Fcpeffects.com Review

They are curated by experts and blend original content with aggregated feeds.

Where are Blastingnews.com’s offices located?

Blastingnews.com has offices in London headquarters, Milan, New York, and Rome, reflecting its global operational presence.

Does Blastingnews.com use fact-checkers?

Yes, Blastingnews.com states that every piece of content submitted by contributors is screened “firstly by a Reviewer, then by our internal newsroom in London” for curation and fact-checking.

What languages does Blastingnews.com publish in?

Blastingnews.com states it relies on freelancers writing in 5 different languages and operates in 8 countries, indicating a multi-lingual publishing approach.

What is the “Eunomia project” Blastingnews.com is involved with?

Blastingnews.com is a key partner of the Eunomia project, funded by the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, which aims to determine the level of trustworthiness of news to combat fake news.

Has Blastingnews.com received funding from Google?

What is Blastingnews.com’s mission and values?

Blastingnews.com’s mission is to offer independent and accurate journalism by telling news from multiple angles “without taking sides,” aiming to help readers build informed opinions by presenting every perspective.

How does Blastingnews.com ensure contributor quality?

Blastingnews.com ensures contributor quality through a mandatory requirement of at least two documented sources for every article, followed by a rigorous curation and fact-checking process involving Reviewers and their internal newsroom.

What is the “Contributors Diversity Policy”?

The Contributors Diversity Policy outlines Blastingnews.com’s commitment to having a diverse pool of contributors from various backgrounds, without limitations of race, class, age, gender, or geography.

Does Blastingnews.com publish exclusive stories?

Yes, Blastingnews.com claims to “Discover Blasting News exclusive stories” that readers “can’t find anywhere else,” implying original reporting and unique insights, sometimes with video and audio sources.

Can I become an investigative reporter for Blastingnews.com?

Yes, Blastingnews.com invites individuals interested in investigative reporting to contact them, indicating opportunities for in-depth journalistic work beyond standard news contributions.

How does Blastingnews.com separate business and editorial decisions?

Blastingnews.com states that while “business decisions… take shareholder value in mind,” “editorial decisions” do not, implying a structural separation to maintain journalistic independence from commercial pressures.

What kind of data does Blastingnews.com collect from users?

Blastingnews.com collects information about user devices, such as IP addresses and device characteristics, and shares this with 1545 partners for web data analysis, advertising, and social media purposes, as indicated by its cookie policy.