Kis-consulting.com Review

Based on checking the website kis-consulting.com, it appears to be a legitimate consulting service focused on assisting homeowners in Florida with defective stucco issues.

The website outlines a clear process, offers a free inspection, and aims to connect homeowners with professionals to recover damages from builders.

The presence of client testimonials, a professional layout, and readily available contact information contributes to its perceived credibility.

However, a deeper dive into the specifics of their “no out of pocket cost” claim and the details of their professional network would be beneficial for a complete assessment.

Here’s an overall review summary:

0.0 0.0 out of 5 stars (based on 0 reviews) Excellent0% Very good0% Average0% Poor0% Terrible0% There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one. Your review Your overall rating Select a Rating5 Stars4 Stars3 Stars2 Stars1 Star Title of your review Your review Your name Your email This review is based on my own experience and is my genuine opinion. ​ Submit Review

Amazon.com: Check Amazon for Kis-consulting.com Review Latest Discussions & Reviews:

• Service Offered: Stucco defect inspection and consultation, connecting homeowners with legal and repair professionals.
• Target Audience: Homeowners in Florida with homes less than 7 years old showing signs of stucco damage.
• Key Value Proposition: Free exterior home inspection, assistance in recovering repair costs from home builders, “no out of pocket cost” for repairs.
• Credibility Indicators: Client testimonials, Google rating 4.6/5 based on 31 reviews, physical address though not explicitly on the homepage, implied by Florida focus, clear contact information phone, email.
• Missing Information for a strict review: Lack of clear team profiles/bios, less emphasis on the legal aspects of their “no out of pocket cost” model, and the specifics of their professional network.
• Overall Recommendation: Appears to be a potentially helpful service for its niche, but users should conduct due diligence regarding the “no out of pocket cost” claim and thoroughly understand any agreements before proceeding.

KIS Consulting, LLC presents itself as a specialized service addressing a very specific and significant problem in Florida homes: defective stucco.

The state’s building codes are strict, and shortcuts in stucco application can lead to serious structural issues like cracking, water intrusion, mold, and eventual deterioration, leading to costly repairs.

KIS Consulting steps in by offering what sounds like a comprehensive solution.

Their process starts with a free, no-obligation exterior home inspection, which is a strong draw for homeowners.

If damage is identified, they claim to “immediately pair” clients with a network of professionals to assist in recovering damages from the home builder to cover necessary repairs.

This “no out of pocket cost” promise is particularly attractive, but it also warrants careful scrutiny to understand its mechanisms and any underlying conditions.

The website showcases several positive testimonials, indicating satisfied customers, and a Google rating of 4.6 out of 5 based on 31 reviews further bolsters their public image.

While the website conveys professionalism and a clear service offering, a more transparent breakdown of the legal and financial arrangements involved would empower potential clients to make more informed decisions.

Here are some ethical and beneficial alternatives for home maintenance and improvement, focusing on general consulting, ethical finance for repairs, and reliable property assessment:

• HomeAdvisor
  • Key Features: Connects homeowners with local, pre-screened home improvement professionals for various projects, including repairs, renovations, and maintenance. Provides instant booking, project cost guides, and customer reviews.
  • Average Price: Varies by project and professional. the platform itself is free for homeowners to use for finding pros.
  • Pros: Extensive network of professionals, user reviews and ratings, pre-screening process, convenient for finding multiple quotes.
  • Cons: Quality of pros can vary, some users report persistent contact from pros, no direct project oversight by HomeAdvisor.
• Angi formerly Angie’s List
  • Key Features: Similar to HomeAdvisor, Angi connects homeowners with local service providers for home repairs, improvements, and maintenance. Offers reviews, ratings, and project management tools.
  • Average Price: Varies by project. free for basic search and contact.
  • Pros: Large database of pros, strong emphasis on customer reviews, dispute resolution services, often offers special deals.
  • Cons: Some services might be behind a paywall, quality can be inconsistent, occasional issues with finding specific niche contractors.
• Thumbtack
  • Key Features: Platform for finding local professionals for a wide range of services, including home improvement, events, and lessons. Users post project details and receive custom quotes from interested pros.
  • Average Price: Varies by project and professional. free for users to request quotes.
  • Pros: Highly customizable job requests, competitive bidding from pros, easy to compare quotes, wide variety of services.
  • Cons: Can receive many quotes, quality of pros varies, less vetting than some other platforms.
• TaskRabbit
  • Key Features: Connects users with local “Taskers” for small jobs and errands, including minor home repairs, assembly, cleaning, and moving help. Focuses on quick, on-demand services.
  • Average Price: Hourly rates set by Taskers. varies by service and location.
  • Pros: Fast and convenient for small tasks, transparent hourly rates, background-checked Taskers, in-app communication.
  • Cons: More suited for smaller jobs than large-scale repairs, availability can vary, some tasks may require specific expertise not always found.
• Green Home Consultation Services
  • Key Features: These services focus on advising homeowners on energy efficiency, sustainable building materials, and eco-friendly home improvements, helping reduce utility costs and environmental impact.
  • Average Price: Varies widely, often project-based or hourly for consultation.
  • Pros: Long-term cost savings, environmental benefits, improved indoor air quality, potential for rebates and incentives.
  • Cons: Initial investment can be higher, finding specialized local consultants can be challenging, results may take time.
• Home Inspection Services
  • Key Features: Independent professionals who conduct thorough visual examinations of a property’s condition, identifying potential issues before purchase or for general maintenance planning.
  • Average Price: $300 – $600 for a standard residential inspection.
  • Pros: Provides objective assessment of property condition, identifies potential costly repairs early, essential for real estate transactions, helps in maintenance planning.
  • Cons: Does not guarantee against all future defects, non-invasive, quality depends on the inspector’s experience.
• Property Management Software
  • Key Features: Tools for homeowners to manage their property’s maintenance schedule, track expenses, store important documents, and communicate with contractors.
  • Average Price: Free to $50/month for advanced features.
  • Pros: Centralized organization for home maintenance, budgeting tools, easy record-keeping for taxes or resale, can set reminders for routine tasks.
  • Cons: Requires consistent input, learning curve for some software, may be overkill for very simple home needs.

Find detailed reviews on Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org, for software products you can also check Producthunt.

IMPORTANT: We have not personally tested this company’s services. This review is based solely on information provided by the company on their website. For independent, verified user experiences, please refer to trusted sources such as Trustpilot, Reddit, and BBB.org.

Kis-consulting.com Review & First Look

Based on an initial review of kis-consulting.com, the website presents itself as a highly specialized service addressing defective stucco issues for homeowners in Florida.

The interface is clean, professional, and relatively easy to navigate, conveying a sense of legitimacy and focus.

The homepage immediately highlights the core problem—defective stucco in Florida—and positions KIS Consulting as the solution.

The design emphasizes clarity and directness.

Key calls to action like “Learn More,” “Get Started,” and “Contact Us” are prominently displayed, guiding visitors through the intended user journey. Ecuhealth.org Review

The color scheme is professional, leaning towards blues and grays, which often communicate trust and reliability in a business context.

From a first look, the site appears to be a dedicated resource for homeowners facing stucco problems, streamlining the process of identifying damage and connecting with professionals for a resolution.

The presence of client testimonials is a strong indicator of a service that has engaged with and satisfied past customers, adding a layer of social proof.

Understanding the Stucco Problem in Florida

Florida’s unique climate and building practices have unfortunately contributed to a significant problem with defective stucco installations.

The high humidity, frequent rainfall, and intense UV exposure can exacerbate issues stemming from improper application, leading to widespread damage. This isn’t just a cosmetic flaw. Bargainsdirect.net.au Review

It’s a structural integrity issue that can severely impact a home’s value and safety.

Common Stucco Defects

Defective stucco typically manifests in several ways, each with its own set of risks.

• Cracking: Hairline cracks are common, but larger, spiderweb, or stair-step cracks often indicate underlying structural movement or improper curing.
• Water Intrusion: This is perhaps the most insidious problem. When stucco is not properly sealed or has cracks, water can seep behind the facade, leading to hidden damage.
• Mold/Wood Rot: Water intrusion creates a damp environment conducive to mold growth and wood rot, severely compromising structural integrity and indoor air quality. According to the Florida Department of Health, mold exposure can cause various health issues, from respiratory problems to skin irritation.
• Complete Deterioration: In severe cases, the stucco can detach from the wall, crumble, or experience widespread efflorescence white, powdery deposits, indicating significant moisture problems.

Impact on Homeowners

The financial and emotional toll on homeowners dealing with defective stucco can be immense.

• Costly Repairs: Repairing stucco, especially when mold or rot is involved, can be extraordinarily expensive, often running into tens of thousands of dollars.
• Decreased Property Value: A home with known stucco issues or a history of water damage will undoubtedly suffer a reduction in market value. Potential buyers are often wary of such properties due to the high repair costs and long-term maintenance concerns.
• Health Concerns: Persistent mold growth due to water intrusion poses serious health risks to residents, particularly those with allergies or respiratory conditions.
• Legal Battles: Homeowners often find themselves in disputes with builders who deny responsibility, leading to complex and lengthy legal processes. Many cases involve a statute of limitations, like Florida’s typically 4-year statute of limitations for latent defects, which means homeowners must act quickly once damage is discovered.

KIS Consulting’s Process: A Deeper Look

KIS Consulting outlines a three-step process designed to guide homeowners through the resolution of stucco failure issues.

This structured approach aims to simplify what can often be a complex and overwhelming problem for property owners. Legitcash-docs.org Review

Step 1: The FREE Exterior Home Inspection

The initial step highlighted by KIS Consulting is a “FREE, no obligation exterior home inspection.” This is a critical entry point for homeowners who might suspect stucco damage but are unsure of the extent or cause.

• Purpose: The primary goal of this inspection is to identify damage related to defective stucco installation. This involves visual assessment of cracks, stains, efflorescence, and other common indicators of stucco failure.
• Expertise: KIS Consulting states their “consultants specialize in identifying damage related to defective stucco installation.” This implies a focused expertise in recognizing issues that might be missed by a general contractor or a less experienced inspector. While specific credentials of these consultants aren’t detailed on the homepage, the claim of specialization is important.
• Value Proposition: A free inspection significantly lowers the barrier for homeowners to seek professional advice, making it an attractive first step in what can otherwise be a daunting process. It allows homeowners to get a professional opinion without immediate financial commitment, a crucial factor when dealing with potentially expensive repairs.

Step 2: Connecting with Professionals

If the free inspection determines that a home has been affected by defective stucco, KIS Consulting states they will “immediately pair” the homeowner with a “network of professionals.”

• The Network: This network is crucial to KIS Consulting’s model. While the website doesn’t explicitly name the types of professionals e.g., lawyers, specialized contractors, forensic engineers, the context of “recovering damages from your home builder” strongly suggests legal counsel. The testimonials, particularly Mike O’Connor’s, explicitly mention being “contacted by the lawyers who would be handling my case.”
• Recovering Damages: The core promise here is to assist in “recovering damages from your home builder to cover any necessary repairs.” This implies a legal or negotiation process where the builder is held accountable for the defective installation. The phrase “no out of pocket cost to you” suggests that the costs of repair and potentially legal fees are covered through this recovery process, rather than being borne directly by the homeowner. This model is often associated with contingency fee arrangements common in civil litigation, where legal professionals take a percentage of the recovered funds.
• Facilitation Role: KIS Consulting positions itself as a facilitator, simplifying the complex task of finding appropriate legal and repair professionals for homeowners who might otherwise struggle to navigate this specialized field. They act as a bridge between the homeowner’s problem and the solution providers.

Step 3: Resolution and Repair

The ultimate goal of KIS Consulting’s process is a full repair and repaint of the home’s exterior.

• Project Management: While the homepage doesn’t detail KIS Consulting’s direct involvement in managing the repair project, the testimonials suggest a coordinated effort. Mike O’Connor’s review, for instance, details the entire process from testing, scheduling replacement, foreman examination, and actual removal and replacement of stucco, culminating in the house being painted. This implies a degree of oversight or coordination from KIS Consulting or the network they connect clients with.
• No Out of Pocket Cost: This is the most significant benefit highlighted. It suggests that homeowners do not have to pay for the inspection, the legal process, or the repairs themselves. Instead, the costs are recovered from the home builder. This kind of arrangement can be extremely appealing to homeowners who might not have the immediate funds for expensive repairs or who are hesitant to pursue legal action due to financial concerns. However, it’s essential for potential clients to understand the exact terms of this “no out of pocket” model, including any percentage fees if the case is successful, and what happens if the case is not successful.

Overall, KIS Consulting’s process aims to offer a seamless, financially accessible pathway for homeowners to address significant stucco defects, leveraging a network of specialized professionals to achieve a full resolution.

KIS Consulting’s Strengths & Considerations

When evaluating KIS Consulting, several strengths emerge from their website, particularly their clear focus and stated results. Make-d33t.beauty Review

However, like any service, there are aspects that warrant closer consideration by potential clients.

Strengths of KIS Consulting

• Niche Specialization: KIS Consulting focuses exclusively on defective stucco issues in Florida. This specialization suggests a deep understanding of the problem, the local building codes, and the specific legal and repair solutions required in the region. This targeted approach can be a significant advantage over general contractors or legal firms.
• “No Out of Pocket Cost” Model: This is a major draw for homeowners. The promise that repairs and potentially legal fees will be covered by funds recovered from the home builder, meaning no upfront costs for the homeowner, is a compelling financial relief. For many, the financial burden of repairs or legal action is a major deterrent, and this model removes that barrier.
• Established Track Record: The claim of having “assisted over 20,000+ homeowners in the state of Florida over the past decade” is a significant statistic. If accurate, it demonstrates extensive experience and a proven ability to deliver results on a large scale. This kind of volume suggests a well-oiled process and considerable expertise.
• Positive Client Testimonials: The website features numerous positive reviews from satisfied clients, with several explicitly mentioning successful repairs and professional service. These testimonials, backed by a 4.6-star Google rating based on 31 reviews, provide strong social proof and build trust. Reviews like Mike O’Connor’s, which details the entire process, add significant credibility.
• Free, No-Obligation Inspection: Offering a free initial inspection reduces the risk for homeowners, allowing them to assess their situation and understand potential solutions without any financial commitment upfront.

Considerations for Potential Clients

While KIS Consulting presents a strong case, certain aspects warrant careful consideration and further inquiry from prospective clients:

• Transparency of “No Out of Pocket Cost”: While highly attractive, the exact terms of the “no out of pocket cost” model should be thoroughly understood. Is it a contingency fee arrangement with legal partners? What percentage of recovered damages, if any, goes to KIS Consulting or their network? Are there any scenarios where the homeowner might incur costs, such as if the case is unsuccessful or if there are administrative fees? A transparent explanation of the financial agreement is crucial to avoid future surprises.
• Specifics of the “Network of Professionals”: The website mentions connecting clients with a “network of professionals” but doesn’t specify who these professionals are e.g., specific law firms, licensed contractors, forensic engineers. Knowing the credentials, licenses, and reputations of the firms or individuals they partner with would provide greater assurance to homeowners. While they state they are “here to help connect you with a team of professionals,” more detail would be beneficial.
• Geographic Limitation: Their service appears to be strictly limited to the state of Florida. While this is understandable for a niche service, it means homeowners outside of Florida will need to seek alternatives.
• Duration of the Process: While testimonials suggest efficiency “approximately 2 weeks” for Mike O’Connor’s case, the overall timeline from initial inspection to full repair and legal resolution can vary significantly depending on the complexity of the case, builder cooperation, and legal proceedings. Understanding typical timelines and potential delays is important for managing expectations. Paul Kolcun’s testimonial mentions delays due to “covid,” indicating external factors can impact the timeline.
• Lack of Detailed Team Information: The homepage does not provide profiles or bios of the KIS Consulting team or its leadership. While not always critical, transparency about the people behind the service can further build trust and demonstrate expertise.

By carefully considering these points, homeowners can make a more informed decision about engaging with KIS Consulting.

How KIS Consulting Navigates Legal & Repair Processes

KIS Consulting’s model appears to bridge the gap between identifying property damage and securing the necessary legal and physical repairs.

Their value proposition centers on simplifying what can often be a protracted and intimidating process for homeowners. Antiagression.com Review

The Legal Recovery Mechanism

The core of KIS Consulting’s “no out of pocket cost” promise likely lies in its engagement with legal professionals specializing in construction defect litigation. This often involves:

• Builder Negotiations: The first step is typically an attempt to negotiate with the home builder. This usually involves presenting evidence of the stucco defects, including inspection reports and photographic evidence, to demand that the builder rectifies the issues or provides financial compensation. Builders may have warranty obligations or be liable under specific construction defect laws.
• Contingency Fee Agreements: For homeowners, the “no out of pocket cost” usually means the associated legal fees for lawyers handling the case are paid on a contingency basis. This means the lawyers only get paid if they successfully recover damages, and their fee is a percentage of the settlement or judgment. This arrangement is common in personal injury or construction defect lawsuits, as it allows individuals to pursue claims without upfront legal costs. For example, law firms often take 33% to 40% of the recovered amount.
• Litigation if necessary: If negotiations fail, the case may proceed to litigation, which can involve filing a lawsuit, discovery exchanging information, mediation, and potentially a trial. KIS Consulting’s role here would be to ensure the homeowner is connected with legal counsel capable of navigating these complexities. The average duration of a construction defect lawsuit can range from 6 months to several years, depending on complexity, jurisdiction, and court backlogs.

The Repair Coordination Aspect

Once legal resolution or a settlement is achieved, the focus shifts to the physical repair of the home’s stucco.

• Specialized Contractors: KIS Consulting emphasizes connecting homeowners with professionals. This likely includes licensed and specialized stucco repair contractors who understand the intricacies of Florida Building Code requirements and proper stucco application techniques. Such contractors are critical for ensuring that the repairs are not only cosmetic but also structurally sound and compliant, preventing future issues.
• Quality Control: While the website doesn’t explicitly detail KIS Consulting’s direct oversight of repairs, testimonials suggest a coordinated effort. Mike O’Connor’s review mentions the house being “examined by the foreman prior to start of the replacement process,” and the entire house being painted with “superior paint.” This implies some level of quality assurance or project management by the affiliated repair teams.
• Full Scope of Work: The stated goal of “full repair and repaint” indicates a comprehensive approach, addressing not just localized damage but ensuring the entire exterior is brought up to standard. This often involves remediation of water damage, mold removal, structural reinforcement if needed, re-application of stucco, and a complete exterior paint job.

Understanding Kis-consulting.com Reviews & Complaints

When evaluating any service, examining user reviews and potential complaints is crucial.

Kis-consulting.com features a section of testimonials on its homepage and mentions a Google rating, providing insights into customer experiences.

Analysis of Positive Reviews

The testimonials presented on kis-consulting.com are overwhelmingly positive. Here are some common themes: Healthista.com Review

• Professionalism: Many reviewers, such as Gregory Hopper and Myrda Desir, praise the “very professional people to work with” and describe their experience as “true professionals.” Katherine Telford highlights that “They sent experienced people out and quickly fixed our home. They were professional and did an excellent job.”
• Effective Communication: Myrda Desir noted being “kept me informed throughout the process,” and Hal Foster mentioned them being “Very communicative.” This suggests that clients appreciate being in the loop during what can be a stressful time.
• Successful Outcomes: Several reviews explicitly state positive results, such as “amazing job with the stucco repairs” J G, “our house looks amazing!!” Katherine Telford, and “My house looks awesome” Hal Foster. Mike O’Connor’s detailed review underscores a complete and satisfactory resolution, including legal negotiations and quality repair work within a reasonable timeframe.
• Ease of Process: Mike O’Connor describes the “process was very easy,” highlighting KIS Consulting’s ability to simplify complex issues for homeowners. Paul Kolcun also emphasizes the clarity and lack of pressure during the initial consultation.

The Google rating of 4.6 out of 5, based on 31 reviews, further substantiates the positive sentiment, indicating a generally high level of customer satisfaction.

Addressing Potential Complaints or Concerns

While the provided testimonials are positive, a comprehensive review also considers the potential for negative feedback or common complaints associated with such services. Since no negative reviews or specific complaints are detailed on the website, we can infer potential areas where complaints might arise, based on the nature of construction defect services:

• Longer-Than-Expected Timelines: While Mike O’Connor’s experience was relatively quick, legal and construction processes can be subject to delays e.g., builder resistance, court backlogs, weather, material availability. Paul Kolcun’s review briefly mentions “delays due to covid,” which suggests that external factors can indeed prolong the process beyond initial expectations. Complaints could arise if these delays are not managed with clear communication.
• Scope of “No Out of Pocket Cost”: Misunderstandings about the financial arrangement, especially regarding potential unforeseen costs or the percentage taken from settlements, could lead to dissatisfaction. If clients are not fully informed about every aspect of the contingency fee or if certain niche costs are not covered, it could lead to complaints.
• Quality of Partner Network: While reviews praise the “experienced people,” if KIS Consulting partners with a sub-par legal firm or contractor, the ultimate outcome could be compromised, leading to client complaints about the quality of the work or legal representation.
• Limited Eligibility: The “home is less than 7 years old” criterion means many homeowners with older properties, even if they have stucco issues, would be ineligible. This could be a source of frustration for those seeking help.
• Communication Gaps: Even with generally good communication, individual instances of missed calls, delayed responses, or unclear explanations could lead to client frustration, especially in a high-stakes situation like home repair.

For a prospective client, actively searching for independent reviews beyond the website e.g., on Better Business Bureau, other review platforms, legal forums for “kis consulting reviews complaints” would provide a more balanced perspective.

However, based solely on the website’s presentation, the company has cultivated a strong positive reputation.

Kis-consulting.com Alternatives

For homeowners dealing with stucco issues or general home repair needs, several alternatives exist, ranging from direct contractor engagement to broader home service platforms. Sleepright.eu Review

While KIS Consulting specializes in a particular niche with a specific financial model, these alternatives offer different approaches to getting repairs done.

Direct Engagement with Stucco Repair Contractors

• Approach: Homeowners directly research, contact, and hire specialized stucco repair companies.
• Pros:
  • Direct Control: You have full control over contractor selection, material choices, and project scope.
  • Potentially Lower Cost if no legal action needed: If the issue is minor and doesn’t warrant legal action against the builder, directly hiring a contractor might be more straightforward and cost-effective than a service involving legal recovery.
  • Local Expertise: Many local contractors have deep knowledge of specific regional building challenges and solutions.
• Cons:
  • Significant Upfront Effort: Requires extensive research, vetting, getting multiple bids, and managing the project yourself.
  • Financial Burden: You bear all upfront costs for inspection, repairs, and any potential legal fees if you decide to pursue the builder independently.
  • No Legal Support: You’re on your own if the builder denies responsibility or if the repair process uncovers further issues requiring legal action.
• Recommendation: Good for homeowners who are confident in their ability to manage a construction project, have the financial resources for upfront costs, or whose stucco issues are clearly not the builder’s fault or are beyond the builder’s warranty period.

Home Service Platforms

Platforms like HomeAdvisor and Angi formerly Angie’s List act as intermediaries to connect homeowners with various local service professionals, including those specializing in stucco.

• Approach: Submit your project details, and the platform matches you with pre-screened contractors who provide quotes.
  • Convenience: Simplifies the process of finding contractors by providing a curated list.
  • Reviews & Ratings: Access to homeowner reviews and ratings helps in vetting potential contractors.
  • Multiple Quotes: Easily compare bids from several companies.
  • Quality Variability: While pre-screened, the quality of individual contractors can still vary.
  • Lead Generation Fees: Contractors pay lead generation fees, which might indirectly influence pricing or enthusiasm for smaller jobs.
  • No Legal Assistance: These platforms are for connecting with repair services, not for legal action against builders.
• Recommendation: Useful for finding general home repair services and contractors, but not specifically designed for complex construction defect claims involving builder liability.

Construction Defect Attorneys

Engaging directly with a law firm specializing in construction defects is an option, especially if you strongly suspect builder negligence and prefer to handle the repair process separately.

• Approach: Consult with an attorney to assess your legal options against the builder, typically on a contingency fee basis.
  • Strong Legal Representation: Direct access to legal expertise to pursue damages effectively.
  • Full Recovery Focus: The attorney’s primary goal is to maximize your financial recovery from the builder.
  • Less Financial Risk contingency: Similar to KIS Consulting’s model, many construction defect lawyers work on contingency, meaning no upfront legal fees.
  • Separation of Legal & Repair: You would still need to find and manage the repair contractors yourself after any settlement.
  • Potentially Longer Process: Legal battles can be protracted, delaying the actual repairs.
  • Focus on Legal: The law firm’s priority is the legal case, not necessarily the physical repair logistics.
• Recommendation: Best for homeowners whose primary concern is holding the builder accountable and are comfortable managing the repair project independently or after securing a settlement.

Independent Home Inspectors & Forensic Engineers

Hiring an independent home inspector or, for more complex issues, a forensic engineer, can provide an unbiased assessment of stucco damage. Adomeez.com Review

• Approach: Pay a professional to conduct a detailed, unbiased inspection and provide a report on the cause and extent of stucco defects.
  • Unbiased Assessment: Provides an objective, expert opinion on the damage, which can be crucial evidence in any dispute.
  • Detailed Reports: Forensic engineers can pinpoint the exact cause of failure e.g., specific building code violations, material defects.
  • Empowerment: Arms the homeowner with concrete evidence to negotiate with builders or engage legal counsel.
  • Upfront Cost: These services require payment upfront.
  • No Repair or Legal Solution: They only provide analysis. you still need to find solutions for repair and legal action.
• Recommendation: An excellent first step for any homeowner suspecting stucco issues, providing the necessary documentation to pursue builder responsibility or plan repairs.

Understanding Kis-consulting.com Pricing

The most appealing aspect of Kis-consulting.com’s service, as prominently stated on their homepage, is the promise of “no out of pocket cost to you!” This unique financial model is designed to alleviate the significant financial burden often associated with extensive home repairs, particularly those requiring legal intervention to recover damages from builders.

The “No Out of Pocket Cost” Model Explained

While the website doesn’t explicitly detail the financial arrangements e.g., contingency fees, percentages, the nature of the service strongly suggests a model where KIS Consulting and its network of professionals likely including lawyers and repair contractors are compensated only if a successful recovery is made from the home builder.

This is typical of contingency fee agreements in legal proceedings.

Here’s a breakdown of how such a model typically operates:

• Free Initial Services: The “FREE, no obligation exterior home inspection” is a key component. This means homeowners don’t pay anything to get their stucco damage assessed.
• Contingency-Based Legal Fees: If a lawsuit or negotiation is pursued against the home builder, the legal team often works on a contingency fee. This means their payment is a percentage of the final settlement or judgment. Common contingency fees for construction defect lawsuits can range from 33% to 40% of the recovered amount. This structure ensures that the homeowner doesn’t pay legal fees upfront, reducing financial risk.
• Repair Costs Covered by Recovery: The “no out of pocket cost” for repairs implies that the funds recovered from the builder are used to pay for the actual stucco repair and repaint services. KIS Consulting likely facilitates this by connecting clients with contractors who are paid from the settlement.
• KIS Consulting’s Compensation: While not stated, KIS Consulting likely derives its revenue either through:
  • Referral fees: From the law firms or contractors they refer clients to.
  • A percentage of the recovery: Similar to the legal team, perhaps KIS Consulting also takes a small percentage of the total recovery as their service fee for managing the process and coordinating the network.
  • Fixed fees: Paid by the network partners for the leads and managed process.

Benefits of This Pricing Model

• Accessibility: This model makes expensive repairs and complex legal processes accessible to homeowners who might not have tens of thousands of dollars readily available for repairs or legal retainers.
• Risk Mitigation: Homeowners face minimal financial risk. If no recovery is made from the builder e.g., the case is lost, or the builder is not liable, the homeowner is generally not responsible for the costs of the inspection, legal work, or attempted repairs though specific terms should be clarified.
• Incentivized Results: The service providers KIS Consulting, lawyers, contractors are incentivized to achieve a successful recovery because their own compensation depends on it.

What to Clarify with KIS Consulting

Before engaging, potential clients should ask specific questions to fully understand the financial implications: Thestarinfrisco.com Review

• What percentage of the recovery, if any, is taken by KIS Consulting and the legal team? Combined or separate percentages
• Are all potential costs covered, including expert witness fees, court filing fees, and administrative charges, or are some of these exceptions?
• What happens if the case is unsuccessful? Are there any scenarios where the homeowner would owe money?
• How are the repair costs specifically handled from the recovered funds?

Understanding these details is crucial for homeowners to make an informed decision and ensure alignment with their financial expectations.

This model is generally beneficial for homeowners as it shifts the financial burden and risk away from them, but clarity on the specific terms is always recommended.

Kis-consulting.com vs. General Contractors

When facing defective stucco, homeowners often weigh their options between specialized services like KIS Consulting and traditional general contractors.

While both aim to address the issue, their approaches, financial models, and scope of services differ significantly.

Kis-consulting.com: Specialized and Problem-Focused

• Focus: KIS Consulting is laser-focused on identifying defective stucco, particularly in Florida, and facilitating the recovery of damages from builders. Their service is built around the premise of holding the original installer accountable.
• Process: Their model includes a free inspection, connection to a network of professionals likely including legal experts and specialized repair contractors, and the promise of “no out of pocket cost” for the homeowner, as costs are recovered from the builder.
• Legal Aspect: A key differentiator is their implied integration of legal assistance to pursue builders for negligence or warranty breaches. This is a complex area that most general contractors do not handle.
• Benefit: Ideal for homeowners who suspect builder fault, want to pursue compensation, and prefer a guided, potentially “no-cost” pathway through a complex legal and repair process. It reduces the burden of finding separate legal and repair teams.
• Consideration: Limited to the specific issue of builder-related defective stucco and relies on a successful recovery from the builder.

General Contractors: Broad and Project-Focused

• Focus: General contractors GCs offer a broad range of construction and repair services. They manage various projects, from renovations and additions to specific repairs like stucco.
• Process:
  1. Consultation/Estimate: You contact a GC, explain the issue, and they provide an estimate for the repair work.
  2. Contract & Payment: If you agree, you sign a contract and typically pay upfront deposits and progress payments as work proceeds.
  3. Repair Execution: The GC oversees the repair work, which may involve hiring subcontractors for specialized tasks like stucco application.
• Legal Aspect: GCs are typically not involved in legal disputes with builders. If you hire a GC to fix stucco that was defectively installed by the original builder, you would still be responsible for pursuing legal action against the builder separately, often incurring significant upfront legal fees.
• Benefit: Good for homeowners who:
  • Have general stucco wear and tear or damage not attributable to initial defective installation.
  • Are past the statute of limitations for builder liability.
  • Prefer direct control over the repair process and are willing to pay for services upfront.
  • Need a contractor for a wider range of home improvements beyond just stucco repair.
• Consideration: Requires upfront payment for services, places the burden of project management on the homeowner, and does not include legal recovery from builders.

Key Differences at a Glance:

Feature	Kis-consulting.com	General Contractor GC
Problem Focus	Defective stucco from original builder	Any stucco damage or general home repair
Financial Model	“No out of pocket cost” contingency-based	Upfront payments, deposits, progress payments
Legal Integration	Includes legal assistance to pursue builders	No legal assistance. homeowner must handle separately
Network vs. Direct Hire	Connects to a network of professionals	Directly hires/manages subcontractors
Eligibility	Often tied to age of home e.g., < 7 years	No specific age limits, depends on project scope
Homeowner Effort	Guided process, less personal management	Requires more homeowner management and vetting

In essence, if you suspect your stucco issues stem from faulty original installation and your home is relatively new, KIS Consulting offers a specialized, potentially financially risk-free pathway to resolution by taking on the builder. Thehustle.co Review

If your stucco needs repair due to age, wear, or other reasons, or if you prefer a direct contractual relationship and are willing to pay upfront, a general contractor is the traditional route.

How to Proceed if You Have Defective Stucco

Discovering defective stucco on your home can be overwhelming, but taking a systematic approach can lead to effective resolution.

Here’s a guide on how to proceed, regardless of whether you choose a service like KIS Consulting or opt for alternatives.

Step 1: Document the Damage Thoroughly

Before contacting any professional, meticulous documentation is your strongest asset.

• Photographs and Videos: Take clear, timestamped photos and videos of all visible damage. Include close-ups of cracks, water stains, mold, deterioration, and wide shots that show the overall context of the affected areas. Capture any related interior damage e.g., ceiling stains, warped baseboards.
• Timeline: Note when you first noticed the damage and any progression over time. This helps establish a timeline, which can be crucial for warranty claims or legal statutes of limitations.
• Maintenance Records: Gather any records of previous inspections, repairs, or maintenance related to your stucco.
• Original Building Documents: Locate your home’s original construction documents, including blueprints, specifications, and warranty information from the builder. These documents can be vital in proving builder liability or identifying specific building code violations.

Step 2: Understand Your Home’s Warranty & Statute of Limitations

This is a critical, often overlooked step. Renovease.com Review

• Builder’s Warranty: Check your purchase agreement and builder’s warranty documents. Many builders offer a structural warranty often 10 years and shorter warranties for components like stucco often 1-2 years for cosmetic issues, but structural defects might fall under a longer term.
• State Statutes of Limitations/Repose: Every state has laws dictating the timeframe within which you can sue a builder for construction defects. In Florida, for example, the statute of limitations for latent construction defects is typically 4 years from the time the defect is discovered or should have been discovered, and a 10-year statute of repose from the date of completion of the building or improvement. This means you must act within these timeframes. Consulting a legal professional early is advised to understand these deadlines for your specific case.

Step 3: Seek Professional Assessment

• Independent Home Inspector/Forensic Engineer: For an unbiased opinion, hire a certified home inspector or a forensic engineer specializing in building envelopes or stucco. They can pinpoint the cause of the defects e.g., improper installation, flashing errors, material issues and provide a detailed report. This report serves as crucial evidence.
• KIS Consulting or Similar Service: If your home meets their criteria e.g., less than 7 years old in Florida and you’re interested in their “no out of pocket” model, contact them for their free inspection. They will assess the damage and explain their process for potentially recovering costs from the builder.
• Multiple Contractor Bids: If you are paying for the repairs yourself, get at least three detailed bids from reputable stucco repair contractors. Ensure they are licensed, insured, and have specific experience with stucco remediation, especially in Florida’s climate. Verify their references and check their online reviews.

Step 4: Explore Resolution Pathways

Depending on your assessment and legal standing, you have several options:

• Builder Notification: If your home is still under warranty or within the statute of limitations, formally notify your builder in writing, providing all your documentation. Most warranties require this “notice to cure” as a first step.
• Mediation/Arbitration: Your builder’s warranty may require mediation or arbitration before litigation. These alternative dispute resolution methods can sometimes provide a faster, less adversarial path to resolution.
• Legal Action: If the builder is unresponsive or denies responsibility, consult with a construction defect attorney. They can advise on the strength of your case, negotiate on your behalf, and initiate a lawsuit if necessary. This is where services like KIS Consulting can be beneficial, as they often connect you directly with such legal professionals.
• Direct Repair Out-of-Pocket: If legal action isn’t feasible, desirable, or the damage is not due to builder negligence, proceed with hiring a qualified contractor to perform the repairs. Ensure they provide a clear scope of work, warranty on their repairs, and are well-versed in Florida Building Code requirements for stucco.

Step 5: Oversee Repairs & Document Progress

If repairs commence, whether through a service or directly:

• Clear Contract: Ensure you have a detailed contract outlining the scope of work, materials, timeline, payment schedule, and warranty for the repairs.
• Regular Inspections: Monitor the progress of the work. If possible, arrange for an independent inspector to review the work at critical stages e.g., after tear-off but before new stucco application to ensure proper installation.
• Keep Records: Maintain all communication, invoices, permits, and repair warranties. This documentation is important for future home sales or if new issues arise.

By following these steps, homeowners can navigate the complex process of addressing defective stucco with greater confidence and increase their chances of a successful resolution.

FAQ

Is Kis-consulting.com a legitimate company?

Yes, based on the information provided on their website, Kis-consulting.com appears to be a legitimate consulting company that specializes in assisting homeowners with defective stucco issues in Florida.

They showcase client testimonials and provide clear contact information. Jocalyn.com Review

What services does Kis-consulting.com offer?

Kis-consulting.com offers free, no-obligation exterior home inspections to identify stucco damage, and if defects are found, they connect homeowners with a network of professionals likely including legal and repair experts to help recover damages from the home builder, aiming for “no out of pocket cost” for the homeowner for repairs.

How does the “no out of pocket cost” work with Kis-consulting.com?

The “no out of pocket cost” model implies that KIS Consulting and its partner professionals are compensated through a percentage of the damages successfully recovered from the home builder.

This means homeowners typically don’t pay upfront fees for the inspection, legal services, or repairs, as these costs are covered by the settlement or judgment.

Does Kis-consulting.com charge for its initial inspection?

No, Kis-consulting.com explicitly states they offer a “FREE, no obligation exterior home inspection” for potential clients.

What kind of stucco issues does Kis-consulting.com address?

Kis-consulting.com focuses on stucco issues resulting from defective installation, which can lead to severe cracks, water intrusion, mold/wood rot, and complete deterioration of the stucco. Lilregie.com Review

What areas does Kis-consulting.com serve?

Based on their website content, Kis-consulting.com primarily serves homeowners in the state of Florida.

How many homeowners has Kis-consulting.com assisted?

Kis-consulting.com claims to have “assisted over 20,000+ homeowners in the state of Florida over the past decade.”

What is the typical timeframe for the Kis-consulting.com process?

While specific timelines can vary, one testimonial on their site mentions a process that took “approximately 2 weeks” from initial examination to full repair and painting, although legal negotiations might extend this.

Other testimonials mention potential delays due to external factors like “covid.”

Does Kis-consulting.com handle the actual stucco repairs?

Kis-consulting.com connects homeowners with a “network of professionals” who handle the repairs. Locordp.com Review

They act as a facilitator and coordinator rather than performing the physical repairs themselves.

Will Kis-consulting.com help me sue my home builder?

While Kis-consulting.com doesn’t explicitly state they sue builders directly, their service involves connecting homeowners with a network of professionals “that can assist in recovering damages from your home builder,” which often implies legal action or negotiation facilitated by lawyers.

What if my home is older than 7 years?

Kis-consulting.com states, “Contact us today if your home is less than 7 years old and is beginning to show signs of stucco damage.” This implies a potential age limit for eligibility, likely due to statutes of limitations for construction defects.

What is the Google rating for Kis-consulting.com?

According to their website, Kis-consulting.com has a Google rating of 4.6 out of 5, based on 31 reviews.

Are the testimonials on Kis-consulting.com real?

The testimonials on Kis-consulting.com’s homepage appear to be genuine, featuring full names and dates, and some provide detailed accounts of their experiences. Voicescloud.com Review

What are the alternatives to Kis-consulting.com?

Alternatives include directly hiring a stucco repair contractor, engaging a construction defect attorney, using home service platforms like HomeAdvisor or Angi, or hiring an independent home inspector or forensic engineer for an unbiased assessment.

What should I ask Kis-consulting.com before proceeding?

You should ask for a clear explanation of the “no out of pocket cost” terms, including any percentage of recovered damages, what specific costs are covered, and what happens if a recovery is not made.

Also, inquire about the credentials and affiliations of their “network of professionals.”

Can defective stucco cause health issues?

Yes, defective stucco can lead to water intrusion and subsequent mold growth and wood rot, which can cause various health issues, particularly respiratory problems, allergies, and skin irritation due to mold exposure.

Is defective stucco a common problem in Florida?

Yes, according to Kis-consulting.com, “DEFECTIVE STUCCO IS A MAJOR ISSUE IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA” due to builders engaged in shortcuts during the application process that violate the Florida Building Code and the state’s climate.

How long do I have to file a claim against a builder for stucco defects in Florida?

In Florida, the statute of limitations for latent construction defects is generally 4 years from discovery, and a statute of repose is 10 years from the date of completion of the building.

It’s crucial to consult a legal professional for specific advice on your situation.

Does Kis-consulting.com provide a warranty on repairs?

While Kis-consulting.com facilitates the repairs through its network, the specific warranty on the repair work itself would typically come from the contractor who performs the repair.

It’s advisable to clarify this with them or the chosen repair professional.

What are the risks of not addressing stucco damage?

Ignoring stucco damage can lead to severe consequences, including increased water intrusion, widespread mold and wood rot, structural compromise, significant decrease in property value, and potentially escalating repair costs over time.